Metgasco Limited v Minister for Resources and Energy

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapterpeer-review


The Bentley Blockade came to a head in May 2014, when thousands of people gathered at the site to prevent Metgasco from delivering its drilling equipment. Metgasco appealed the suspension and submitted documentation to the government to support its argument that it had engaged in adequate consultation. Metgasco's consultation activities had been primarily confined to information provision and it had chosen not to engage with community members who were opposed to coal seam gas (CSG) drilling – instead characterising them as being misinformed about the nature of its operations. The Delegate's second decision to suspend Metgasco's Activity Approval was not separately invalid because, in asserting that a condition requiring 'effective consultation' had been breached, it took into account an irrelevant consideration, that being the results of the consultation, rather than focusing upon the attributes of the consultation itself. Metgasco sought judicial review of the Delegate's two decisions to suspend its Activity Approval before the Supreme Court of New South Wales.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLaw as if Earth Really Mattered
Subtitle of host publicationThe Wild Law Judgment Project
EditorsNicole Rogers, Maloney Michelle
Place of PublicationLondon & New York
PublisherTaylor & Francis
Number of pages13
ISBN (Electronic)9781317210580
ISBN (Print)9781138669086
Publication statusPublished - 21 Apr 2017
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Metgasco Limited v Minister for Resources and Energy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this