Methods of measuring nursing workload in Australia.

Christine Duffield, Michael Roche, Eamon Thomas Merrick

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Continuing and worsening nurse shortages nationally and internationally have reignited the debate in Australia about the methods of measuring nursing workload. As workload is one of the most significant factors in nursing retention, measuring nursing workload reliably is the critical initial step to understanding the relationship between workload, nursing retention and patient safety. In Australia, some states and territories have no measure of nursing workload and those states that have introduced measurement methods are inconsistent in their approach. This paper provides a critical review of the methods of measuring nursing workload with particular reference to Australia. It also explores the strengths and limitations of each approach in terms of its reliability and utility. This review highlights the implications of not understanding fully the impact of excessive workload on patient and nurse safety outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16-22
Number of pages7
JournalCollegian
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Workload
Nursing
Patient Safety
Nurses

Cite this

Duffield, Christine ; Roche, Michael ; Merrick, Eamon Thomas. / Methods of measuring nursing workload in Australia. In: Collegian. 2006 ; Vol. 13, No. 1. pp. 16-22.
@article{5acb2fdfbb484fb1bbce73e9c87ee785,
title = "Methods of measuring nursing workload in Australia.",
abstract = "Continuing and worsening nurse shortages nationally and internationally have reignited the debate in Australia about the methods of measuring nursing workload. As workload is one of the most significant factors in nursing retention, measuring nursing workload reliably is the critical initial step to understanding the relationship between workload, nursing retention and patient safety. In Australia, some states and territories have no measure of nursing workload and those states that have introduced measurement methods are inconsistent in their approach. This paper provides a critical review of the methods of measuring nursing workload with particular reference to Australia. It also explores the strengths and limitations of each approach in terms of its reliability and utility. This review highlights the implications of not understanding fully the impact of excessive workload on patient and nurse safety outcomes.",
author = "Christine Duffield and Michael Roche and Merrick, {Eamon Thomas}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1016/S1322-7696(08)60512-0",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "16--22",
journal = "Collegian",
issn = "1322-7696",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Duffield, C, Roche, M & Merrick, ET 2006, 'Methods of measuring nursing workload in Australia.', Collegian, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 16-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1322-7696(08)60512-0

Methods of measuring nursing workload in Australia. / Duffield, Christine; Roche, Michael; Merrick, Eamon Thomas.

In: Collegian, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2006, p. 16-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methods of measuring nursing workload in Australia.

AU - Duffield, Christine

AU - Roche, Michael

AU - Merrick, Eamon Thomas

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Continuing and worsening nurse shortages nationally and internationally have reignited the debate in Australia about the methods of measuring nursing workload. As workload is one of the most significant factors in nursing retention, measuring nursing workload reliably is the critical initial step to understanding the relationship between workload, nursing retention and patient safety. In Australia, some states and territories have no measure of nursing workload and those states that have introduced measurement methods are inconsistent in their approach. This paper provides a critical review of the methods of measuring nursing workload with particular reference to Australia. It also explores the strengths and limitations of each approach in terms of its reliability and utility. This review highlights the implications of not understanding fully the impact of excessive workload on patient and nurse safety outcomes.

AB - Continuing and worsening nurse shortages nationally and internationally have reignited the debate in Australia about the methods of measuring nursing workload. As workload is one of the most significant factors in nursing retention, measuring nursing workload reliably is the critical initial step to understanding the relationship between workload, nursing retention and patient safety. In Australia, some states and territories have no measure of nursing workload and those states that have introduced measurement methods are inconsistent in their approach. This paper provides a critical review of the methods of measuring nursing workload with particular reference to Australia. It also explores the strengths and limitations of each approach in terms of its reliability and utility. This review highlights the implications of not understanding fully the impact of excessive workload on patient and nurse safety outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646114293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1322-7696(08)60512-0

DO - 10.1016/S1322-7696(08)60512-0

M3 - Review article

VL - 13

SP - 16

EP - 22

JO - Collegian

JF - Collegian

SN - 1322-7696

IS - 1

ER -