Microsite conditions dominate habitat selection of the red mason bee

Jeroen Everaars, M Strohbach, Bernd Gruber, Carsten Dormann

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    13 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The red mason bee (Osmia bicornis L.) is a common wild bee in urban environments which contributes to early-season pollination. We know only little about how any species of wild bee in cities responds to resource distribution or landscape structure and the urban habitat(s) that they prefer. We employed a citizen science approach to investigate drivers behind the spatial distribution of this solitary bee in the urban region of Leipzig (Germany). Volunteers hung trap nests at different locations and collected information on eight local, microsite conditions (such as sun exposure, attachment position, local flower availability). We derived 14 landscape factors from a digital GIS biotope data map (e.g. distance to flower sites and urban matrix properties such as size and edge length of patches). Both occurrence and abundance of O. bicornis were then analyzed using a combination of machine learning and multiple (logistic) regression. The results indicate that the red mason bee is ubiquitous in urban area but clearly profits from nearby floral resources. Although we expected a balanced influence of landscape factors and microsite conditions, we found that hang location of the trap nest was most important, followed by sun exposure. Cities with many fine-scaled floral resources (such as private gardens but not parks) and an open housing structure with higher sun exposure between buildings provide a good environment for cavity-nesting bees such as O. bicornis. In places without suitable nesting opportunities, artificial nest can support the bees.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)15-23
    Number of pages9
    JournalLandscape and Urban Planning
    Volume103
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    habitat selection
    bee
    flower
    nest
    resource
    artificial nest
    urban region
    landscape structure
    biotope
    pollination
    garden
    logistics
    cavity
    urban area
    GIS
    spatial distribution
    matrix
    exposure
    city

    Cite this

    Everaars, Jeroen ; Strohbach, M ; Gruber, Bernd ; Dormann, Carsten. / Microsite conditions dominate habitat selection of the red mason bee. In: Landscape and Urban Planning. 2011 ; Vol. 103, No. 1. pp. 15-23.
    @article{baa2c58d55ce4d5f80f141bc2c3be8e4,
    title = "Microsite conditions dominate habitat selection of the red mason bee",
    abstract = "The red mason bee (Osmia bicornis L.) is a common wild bee in urban environments which contributes to early-season pollination. We know only little about how any species of wild bee in cities responds to resource distribution or landscape structure and the urban habitat(s) that they prefer. We employed a citizen science approach to investigate drivers behind the spatial distribution of this solitary bee in the urban region of Leipzig (Germany). Volunteers hung trap nests at different locations and collected information on eight local, microsite conditions (such as sun exposure, attachment position, local flower availability). We derived 14 landscape factors from a digital GIS biotope data map (e.g. distance to flower sites and urban matrix properties such as size and edge length of patches). Both occurrence and abundance of O. bicornis were then analyzed using a combination of machine learning and multiple (logistic) regression. The results indicate that the red mason bee is ubiquitous in urban area but clearly profits from nearby floral resources. Although we expected a balanced influence of landscape factors and microsite conditions, we found that hang location of the trap nest was most important, followed by sun exposure. Cities with many fine-scaled floral resources (such as private gardens but not parks) and an open housing structure with higher sun exposure between buildings provide a good environment for cavity-nesting bees such as O. bicornis. In places without suitable nesting opportunities, artificial nest can support the bees.",
    keywords = "Solitary bees, Trap nest, Urban landscape structure, Citizen science, Sun exposure, Spatial distribution",
    author = "Jeroen Everaars and M Strohbach and Bernd Gruber and Carsten Dormann",
    year = "2011",
    doi = "10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.05.008",
    language = "English",
    volume = "103",
    pages = "15--23",
    journal = "Landscape Planning",
    issn = "0169-2046",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "1",

    }

    Microsite conditions dominate habitat selection of the red mason bee. / Everaars, Jeroen; Strohbach, M; Gruber, Bernd; Dormann, Carsten.

    In: Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 103, No. 1, 2011, p. 15-23.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Microsite conditions dominate habitat selection of the red mason bee

    AU - Everaars, Jeroen

    AU - Strohbach, M

    AU - Gruber, Bernd

    AU - Dormann, Carsten

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - The red mason bee (Osmia bicornis L.) is a common wild bee in urban environments which contributes to early-season pollination. We know only little about how any species of wild bee in cities responds to resource distribution or landscape structure and the urban habitat(s) that they prefer. We employed a citizen science approach to investigate drivers behind the spatial distribution of this solitary bee in the urban region of Leipzig (Germany). Volunteers hung trap nests at different locations and collected information on eight local, microsite conditions (such as sun exposure, attachment position, local flower availability). We derived 14 landscape factors from a digital GIS biotope data map (e.g. distance to flower sites and urban matrix properties such as size and edge length of patches). Both occurrence and abundance of O. bicornis were then analyzed using a combination of machine learning and multiple (logistic) regression. The results indicate that the red mason bee is ubiquitous in urban area but clearly profits from nearby floral resources. Although we expected a balanced influence of landscape factors and microsite conditions, we found that hang location of the trap nest was most important, followed by sun exposure. Cities with many fine-scaled floral resources (such as private gardens but not parks) and an open housing structure with higher sun exposure between buildings provide a good environment for cavity-nesting bees such as O. bicornis. In places without suitable nesting opportunities, artificial nest can support the bees.

    AB - The red mason bee (Osmia bicornis L.) is a common wild bee in urban environments which contributes to early-season pollination. We know only little about how any species of wild bee in cities responds to resource distribution or landscape structure and the urban habitat(s) that they prefer. We employed a citizen science approach to investigate drivers behind the spatial distribution of this solitary bee in the urban region of Leipzig (Germany). Volunteers hung trap nests at different locations and collected information on eight local, microsite conditions (such as sun exposure, attachment position, local flower availability). We derived 14 landscape factors from a digital GIS biotope data map (e.g. distance to flower sites and urban matrix properties such as size and edge length of patches). Both occurrence and abundance of O. bicornis were then analyzed using a combination of machine learning and multiple (logistic) regression. The results indicate that the red mason bee is ubiquitous in urban area but clearly profits from nearby floral resources. Although we expected a balanced influence of landscape factors and microsite conditions, we found that hang location of the trap nest was most important, followed by sun exposure. Cities with many fine-scaled floral resources (such as private gardens but not parks) and an open housing structure with higher sun exposure between buildings provide a good environment for cavity-nesting bees such as O. bicornis. In places without suitable nesting opportunities, artificial nest can support the bees.

    KW - Solitary bees

    KW - Trap nest

    KW - Urban landscape structure

    KW - Citizen science

    KW - Sun exposure

    KW - Spatial distribution

    U2 - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.05.008

    DO - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.05.008

    M3 - Article

    VL - 103

    SP - 15

    EP - 23

    JO - Landscape Planning

    JF - Landscape Planning

    SN - 0169-2046

    IS - 1

    ER -