Microsite conditions dominate habitat selection of the red mason bee

Jeroen Everaars, Michael W. Strohbach, Bernd Gruber, Carsten Dormann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The red mason bee (Osmia bicornis L.) is a common wild bee in urban environments which contributes to early-season pollination. We know only little about how any species of wild bee in cities responds to resource distribution or landscape structure and the urban habitat(s) that they prefer. We employed a citizen science approach to investigate drivers behind the spatial distribution of this solitary bee in the urban region of Leipzig (Germany). Volunteers hung trap nests at different locations and collected information on eight local, microsite conditions (such as sun exposure, attachment position, local flower availability). We derived 14 landscape factors from a digital GIS biotope data map (e.g. distance to flower sites and urban matrix properties such as size and edge length of patches). Both occurrence and abundance of O. bicornis were then analyzed using a combination of machine learning and multiple (logistic) regression. The results indicate that the red mason bee is ubiquitous in urban area but clearly profits from nearby floral resources. Although we expected a balanced influence of landscape factors and microsite conditions, we found that hang location of the trap nest was most important, followed by sun exposure. Cities with many fine-scaled floral resources (such as private gardens but not parks) and an open housing structure with higher sun exposure between buildings provide a good environment for cavity-nesting bees such as O. bicornis. In places without suitable nesting opportunities, artificial nest can support the bees.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)15-23
Number of pages9
JournalLandscape and Urban Planning
Volume103
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

habitat selection
bee
flower
nest
resource
artificial nest
urban region
landscape structure
biotope
pollination
garden
logistics
cavity
urban area
GIS
spatial distribution
matrix
exposure
city

Cite this

Everaars, Jeroen ; Strohbach, Michael W. ; Gruber, Bernd ; Dormann, Carsten. / Microsite conditions dominate habitat selection of the red mason bee. In: Landscape and Urban Planning. 2011 ; Vol. 103, No. 1. pp. 15-23.
@article{baa2c58d55ce4d5f80f141bc2c3be8e4,
title = "Microsite conditions dominate habitat selection of the red mason bee",
abstract = "The red mason bee (Osmia bicornis L.) is a common wild bee in urban environments which contributes to early-season pollination. We know only little about how any species of wild bee in cities responds to resource distribution or landscape structure and the urban habitat(s) that they prefer. We employed a citizen science approach to investigate drivers behind the spatial distribution of this solitary bee in the urban region of Leipzig (Germany). Volunteers hung trap nests at different locations and collected information on eight local, microsite conditions (such as sun exposure, attachment position, local flower availability). We derived 14 landscape factors from a digital GIS biotope data map (e.g. distance to flower sites and urban matrix properties such as size and edge length of patches). Both occurrence and abundance of O. bicornis were then analyzed using a combination of machine learning and multiple (logistic) regression. The results indicate that the red mason bee is ubiquitous in urban area but clearly profits from nearby floral resources. Although we expected a balanced influence of landscape factors and microsite conditions, we found that hang location of the trap nest was most important, followed by sun exposure. Cities with many fine-scaled floral resources (such as private gardens but not parks) and an open housing structure with higher sun exposure between buildings provide a good environment for cavity-nesting bees such as O. bicornis. In places without suitable nesting opportunities, artificial nest can support the bees.",
keywords = "Solitary bees, Trap nest, Urban landscape structure, Citizen science, Sun exposure, Spatial distribution",
author = "Jeroen Everaars and Strohbach, {Michael W.} and Bernd Gruber and Carsten Dormann",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.05.008",
language = "English",
volume = "103",
pages = "15--23",
journal = "Landscape Planning",
issn = "0169-2046",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Microsite conditions dominate habitat selection of the red mason bee. / Everaars, Jeroen; Strohbach, Michael W.; Gruber, Bernd; Dormann, Carsten.

In: Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 103, No. 1, 2011, p. 15-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Microsite conditions dominate habitat selection of the red mason bee

AU - Everaars, Jeroen

AU - Strohbach, Michael W.

AU - Gruber, Bernd

AU - Dormann, Carsten

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The red mason bee (Osmia bicornis L.) is a common wild bee in urban environments which contributes to early-season pollination. We know only little about how any species of wild bee in cities responds to resource distribution or landscape structure and the urban habitat(s) that they prefer. We employed a citizen science approach to investigate drivers behind the spatial distribution of this solitary bee in the urban region of Leipzig (Germany). Volunteers hung trap nests at different locations and collected information on eight local, microsite conditions (such as sun exposure, attachment position, local flower availability). We derived 14 landscape factors from a digital GIS biotope data map (e.g. distance to flower sites and urban matrix properties such as size and edge length of patches). Both occurrence and abundance of O. bicornis were then analyzed using a combination of machine learning and multiple (logistic) regression. The results indicate that the red mason bee is ubiquitous in urban area but clearly profits from nearby floral resources. Although we expected a balanced influence of landscape factors and microsite conditions, we found that hang location of the trap nest was most important, followed by sun exposure. Cities with many fine-scaled floral resources (such as private gardens but not parks) and an open housing structure with higher sun exposure between buildings provide a good environment for cavity-nesting bees such as O. bicornis. In places without suitable nesting opportunities, artificial nest can support the bees.

AB - The red mason bee (Osmia bicornis L.) is a common wild bee in urban environments which contributes to early-season pollination. We know only little about how any species of wild bee in cities responds to resource distribution or landscape structure and the urban habitat(s) that they prefer. We employed a citizen science approach to investigate drivers behind the spatial distribution of this solitary bee in the urban region of Leipzig (Germany). Volunteers hung trap nests at different locations and collected information on eight local, microsite conditions (such as sun exposure, attachment position, local flower availability). We derived 14 landscape factors from a digital GIS biotope data map (e.g. distance to flower sites and urban matrix properties such as size and edge length of patches). Both occurrence and abundance of O. bicornis were then analyzed using a combination of machine learning and multiple (logistic) regression. The results indicate that the red mason bee is ubiquitous in urban area but clearly profits from nearby floral resources. Although we expected a balanced influence of landscape factors and microsite conditions, we found that hang location of the trap nest was most important, followed by sun exposure. Cities with many fine-scaled floral resources (such as private gardens but not parks) and an open housing structure with higher sun exposure between buildings provide a good environment for cavity-nesting bees such as O. bicornis. In places without suitable nesting opportunities, artificial nest can support the bees.

KW - Solitary bees

KW - Trap nest

KW - Urban landscape structure

KW - Citizen science

KW - Sun exposure

KW - Spatial distribution

UR - http://10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.011

U2 - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.05.008

DO - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.05.008

M3 - Article

VL - 103

SP - 15

EP - 23

JO - Landscape Planning

JF - Landscape Planning

SN - 0169-2046

IS - 1

ER -