Mobility in the urban labor market

A panel data analysis for Mexico

Xiaodong Gong, Arthur van Soest, Elizabeth Villagomez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, we develop a dynamic discrete choice model that can explain the dynamics of sector choice in urban Mexico. We study the mobility patterns among three states, formal sector employment, informal sector work, and not working, and analyze how these patterns vary across groups with different characteristics and family resources. We use data from Mexico's quarterly Urban Employment Survey. We focus on eight panel waves drawn in 1999-2000 but also compare these with estimates for panels covering 1992-93 and 1994-95. The period 1992-93 was a time of steady economic growth; the 1994-95 period is characterized by the economic downturn after the peso crisis. After some years of recovery, the 1999-2000 period is again characterized by economic growth. It seems interesting to compare the results for these three time periods, particularly since the nature of the difference between the formal and informal sector may have changed because of institutional reforms and the growth of foreign-owned in-bond manufacturing industries. The model estimates are used to predict the probabilities of changing from one state to another for benchmark individuals with given observed and unobserved characteristics. These predicted probabilities are used to test the null hypothesis that the transition patterns between sectors are in line with the symmetric view of formal and informal sector jobs. To be precise, we show that the null hypothesis that formal and informal sector jobs have the same entry and access rates implies restrictions on the state probabilities and the transition rates for both sectors. On the basis of our model estimates, we test restrictions for the benchmark workers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-36
Number of pages36
JournalEconomic Development and Cultural Change
Volume53
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

informal sector
panel data
labor market
data analysis
Mexico
economic growth
institutional reform
manufacturing industry
manufacturing
worker
reform
Panel data analysis
Urban labor markets
Formal and informal sectors
industry
resource
economics
resources
Economic growth
Benchmark

Cite this

Gong, Xiaodong ; van Soest, Arthur ; Villagomez, Elizabeth. / Mobility in the urban labor market : A panel data analysis for Mexico. In: Economic Development and Cultural Change. 2004 ; Vol. 53, No. 1. pp. 1-36.
@article{75b29f524d29496f892c1374cc8648cc,
title = "Mobility in the urban labor market: A panel data analysis for Mexico",
abstract = "In this article, we develop a dynamic discrete choice model that can explain the dynamics of sector choice in urban Mexico. We study the mobility patterns among three states, formal sector employment, informal sector work, and not working, and analyze how these patterns vary across groups with different characteristics and family resources. We use data from Mexico's quarterly Urban Employment Survey. We focus on eight panel waves drawn in 1999-2000 but also compare these with estimates for panels covering 1992-93 and 1994-95. The period 1992-93 was a time of steady economic growth; the 1994-95 period is characterized by the economic downturn after the peso crisis. After some years of recovery, the 1999-2000 period is again characterized by economic growth. It seems interesting to compare the results for these three time periods, particularly since the nature of the difference between the formal and informal sector may have changed because of institutional reforms and the growth of foreign-owned in-bond manufacturing industries. The model estimates are used to predict the probabilities of changing from one state to another for benchmark individuals with given observed and unobserved characteristics. These predicted probabilities are used to test the null hypothesis that the transition patterns between sectors are in line with the symmetric view of formal and informal sector jobs. To be precise, we show that the null hypothesis that formal and informal sector jobs have the same entry and access rates implies restrictions on the state probabilities and the transition rates for both sectors. On the basis of our model estimates, we test restrictions for the benchmark workers.",
author = "Xiaodong Gong and {van Soest}, Arthur and Elizabeth Villagomez",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1086/423251",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "1--36",
journal = "Economic Development and Cultural Change",
issn = "0013-0079",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "1",

}

Mobility in the urban labor market : A panel data analysis for Mexico. / Gong, Xiaodong; van Soest, Arthur; Villagomez, Elizabeth.

In: Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 53, No. 1, 10.2004, p. 1-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mobility in the urban labor market

T2 - A panel data analysis for Mexico

AU - Gong, Xiaodong

AU - van Soest, Arthur

AU - Villagomez, Elizabeth

PY - 2004/10

Y1 - 2004/10

N2 - In this article, we develop a dynamic discrete choice model that can explain the dynamics of sector choice in urban Mexico. We study the mobility patterns among three states, formal sector employment, informal sector work, and not working, and analyze how these patterns vary across groups with different characteristics and family resources. We use data from Mexico's quarterly Urban Employment Survey. We focus on eight panel waves drawn in 1999-2000 but also compare these with estimates for panels covering 1992-93 and 1994-95. The period 1992-93 was a time of steady economic growth; the 1994-95 period is characterized by the economic downturn after the peso crisis. After some years of recovery, the 1999-2000 period is again characterized by economic growth. It seems interesting to compare the results for these three time periods, particularly since the nature of the difference between the formal and informal sector may have changed because of institutional reforms and the growth of foreign-owned in-bond manufacturing industries. The model estimates are used to predict the probabilities of changing from one state to another for benchmark individuals with given observed and unobserved characteristics. These predicted probabilities are used to test the null hypothesis that the transition patterns between sectors are in line with the symmetric view of formal and informal sector jobs. To be precise, we show that the null hypothesis that formal and informal sector jobs have the same entry and access rates implies restrictions on the state probabilities and the transition rates for both sectors. On the basis of our model estimates, we test restrictions for the benchmark workers.

AB - In this article, we develop a dynamic discrete choice model that can explain the dynamics of sector choice in urban Mexico. We study the mobility patterns among three states, formal sector employment, informal sector work, and not working, and analyze how these patterns vary across groups with different characteristics and family resources. We use data from Mexico's quarterly Urban Employment Survey. We focus on eight panel waves drawn in 1999-2000 but also compare these with estimates for panels covering 1992-93 and 1994-95. The period 1992-93 was a time of steady economic growth; the 1994-95 period is characterized by the economic downturn after the peso crisis. After some years of recovery, the 1999-2000 period is again characterized by economic growth. It seems interesting to compare the results for these three time periods, particularly since the nature of the difference between the formal and informal sector may have changed because of institutional reforms and the growth of foreign-owned in-bond manufacturing industries. The model estimates are used to predict the probabilities of changing from one state to another for benchmark individuals with given observed and unobserved characteristics. These predicted probabilities are used to test the null hypothesis that the transition patterns between sectors are in line with the symmetric view of formal and informal sector jobs. To be precise, we show that the null hypothesis that formal and informal sector jobs have the same entry and access rates implies restrictions on the state probabilities and the transition rates for both sectors. On the basis of our model estimates, we test restrictions for the benchmark workers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=12344330483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/423251

DO - 10.1086/423251

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 1

EP - 36

JO - Economic Development and Cultural Change

JF - Economic Development and Cultural Change

SN - 0013-0079

IS - 1

ER -