Modeling dynamics of native and invasive species to guide prioritization of management actions

Cheryl A. Lohr, Jim Hone, Michael Bode, Christopher R. Dickman, Amelia Wenger, Robert L. Pressey

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    3 Citations (Scopus)
    3 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Action to achieve biodiversity conservation is usually expensive, and resources are limited relative to conservation goals. Prioritizing management investment therefore is essential if important goals are to be achieved. New software, the “Islands DSS,” has been developed to prioritize the mix of management actions that will optimally mitigate biodiversity loss. Here, we present novel temporally dynamic models of species population growth, interaction, and management efficacy that have been incorporated into the software. We have analyzed the sensitivity of these models to uncertainty in four parameters: maximum rate of population growth (rmax), coefficient of species interaction (αij), quantity of food resources required to maintain species equilibrium (Ji), and the coefficient of management efficacy (θi). We focused on the projected abundance of species by simulating interactions among one to four species, both invasive and native, on a hypothetical arid-tropical island that is 1000 ha in size and consists of five evenly distributed habitat types. Sensitivity analysis revealed significant variation in species abundance due to uncertainty in rmax (coefficient = 51.34; P < 0.001) and αij (Ni = −16.48; P = 0.43; Nj = −2.332; P = 2.00−16), a significant but potentially stabilizing effect of modeling multiple species simultaneously (coefficient = −65.80; P = 2.00−16), and mirroring by species response trajectories of threat mitigation trajectories. There are several benefits of using temporally dynamic models of species responses to threat mitigation in systematic conservation planning including increased accuracy in estimates of the cost of management; locally relevant understanding of lag-times between threat establishment and unacceptable impacts on valued species; understanding of threat abundance and required intensity of control for biodiversity features to persist; site- and species-specific understanding of time to eradication and threat recovery when management is interrupted; and an improved understanding of the opportunity cost, in terms of threat levels and responses of native species, for islands not selected for management. Our models and associated software are based on decades of ecological research, potentially useful in a wide range of situations, including islands, the mainland, and marine regions, and we suggest that they provide managers with novel and powerful tools to efficiently prioritize conservation actions via the new systematic conservation planning software, “Islands DSS.”
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalEcosphere
    Volume8
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2017

    Cite this

    Lohr, Cheryl A. ; Hone, Jim ; Bode, Michael ; Dickman, Christopher R. ; Wenger, Amelia ; Pressey, Robert L. / Modeling dynamics of native and invasive species to guide prioritization of management actions. In: Ecosphere. 2017 ; Vol. 8, No. 5.
    @article{6282e5bf270b403f95048c651ac2ffc5,
    title = "Modeling dynamics of native and invasive species to guide prioritization of management actions",
    abstract = "Action to achieve biodiversity conservation is usually expensive, and resources are limited relative to conservation goals. Prioritizing management investment therefore is essential if important goals are to be achieved. New software, the “Islands DSS,” has been developed to prioritize the mix of management actions that will optimally mitigate biodiversity loss. Here, we present novel temporally dynamic models of species population growth, interaction, and management efficacy that have been incorporated into the software. We have analyzed the sensitivity of these models to uncertainty in four parameters: maximum rate of population growth (rmax), coefficient of species interaction (αij), quantity of food resources required to maintain species equilibrium (Ji), and the coefficient of management efficacy (θi). We focused on the projected abundance of species by simulating interactions among one to four species, both invasive and native, on a hypothetical arid-tropical island that is 1000 ha in size and consists of five evenly distributed habitat types. Sensitivity analysis revealed significant variation in species abundance due to uncertainty in rmax (coefficient = 51.34; P < 0.001) and αij (Ni = −16.48; P = 0.43; Nj = −2.332; P = 2.00−16), a significant but potentially stabilizing effect of modeling multiple species simultaneously (coefficient = −65.80; P = 2.00−16), and mirroring by species response trajectories of threat mitigation trajectories. There are several benefits of using temporally dynamic models of species responses to threat mitigation in systematic conservation planning including increased accuracy in estimates of the cost of management; locally relevant understanding of lag-times between threat establishment and unacceptable impacts on valued species; understanding of threat abundance and required intensity of control for biodiversity features to persist; site- and species-specific understanding of time to eradication and threat recovery when management is interrupted; and an improved understanding of the opportunity cost, in terms of threat levels and responses of native species, for islands not selected for management. Our models and associated software are based on decades of ecological research, potentially useful in a wide range of situations, including islands, the mainland, and marine regions, and we suggest that they provide managers with novel and powerful tools to efficiently prioritize conservation actions via the new systematic conservation planning software, “Islands DSS.”",
    keywords = "conservation planning, invasive species, sensitivity analysis, species response trajectory, threat mitigation",
    author = "Lohr, {Cheryl A.} and Jim Hone and Michael Bode and Dickman, {Christopher R.} and Amelia Wenger and Pressey, {Robert L.}",
    year = "2017",
    month = "5",
    doi = "10.1002/ecs2.1822",
    language = "English",
    volume = "8",
    journal = "Ecosphere",
    issn = "2150-8925",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "5",

    }

    Modeling dynamics of native and invasive species to guide prioritization of management actions. / Lohr, Cheryl A.; Hone, Jim; Bode, Michael; Dickman, Christopher R.; Wenger, Amelia; Pressey, Robert L.

    In: Ecosphere, Vol. 8, No. 5, 05.2017.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Modeling dynamics of native and invasive species to guide prioritization of management actions

    AU - Lohr, Cheryl A.

    AU - Hone, Jim

    AU - Bode, Michael

    AU - Dickman, Christopher R.

    AU - Wenger, Amelia

    AU - Pressey, Robert L.

    PY - 2017/5

    Y1 - 2017/5

    N2 - Action to achieve biodiversity conservation is usually expensive, and resources are limited relative to conservation goals. Prioritizing management investment therefore is essential if important goals are to be achieved. New software, the “Islands DSS,” has been developed to prioritize the mix of management actions that will optimally mitigate biodiversity loss. Here, we present novel temporally dynamic models of species population growth, interaction, and management efficacy that have been incorporated into the software. We have analyzed the sensitivity of these models to uncertainty in four parameters: maximum rate of population growth (rmax), coefficient of species interaction (αij), quantity of food resources required to maintain species equilibrium (Ji), and the coefficient of management efficacy (θi). We focused on the projected abundance of species by simulating interactions among one to four species, both invasive and native, on a hypothetical arid-tropical island that is 1000 ha in size and consists of five evenly distributed habitat types. Sensitivity analysis revealed significant variation in species abundance due to uncertainty in rmax (coefficient = 51.34; P < 0.001) and αij (Ni = −16.48; P = 0.43; Nj = −2.332; P = 2.00−16), a significant but potentially stabilizing effect of modeling multiple species simultaneously (coefficient = −65.80; P = 2.00−16), and mirroring by species response trajectories of threat mitigation trajectories. There are several benefits of using temporally dynamic models of species responses to threat mitigation in systematic conservation planning including increased accuracy in estimates of the cost of management; locally relevant understanding of lag-times between threat establishment and unacceptable impacts on valued species; understanding of threat abundance and required intensity of control for biodiversity features to persist; site- and species-specific understanding of time to eradication and threat recovery when management is interrupted; and an improved understanding of the opportunity cost, in terms of threat levels and responses of native species, for islands not selected for management. Our models and associated software are based on decades of ecological research, potentially useful in a wide range of situations, including islands, the mainland, and marine regions, and we suggest that they provide managers with novel and powerful tools to efficiently prioritize conservation actions via the new systematic conservation planning software, “Islands DSS.”

    AB - Action to achieve biodiversity conservation is usually expensive, and resources are limited relative to conservation goals. Prioritizing management investment therefore is essential if important goals are to be achieved. New software, the “Islands DSS,” has been developed to prioritize the mix of management actions that will optimally mitigate biodiversity loss. Here, we present novel temporally dynamic models of species population growth, interaction, and management efficacy that have been incorporated into the software. We have analyzed the sensitivity of these models to uncertainty in four parameters: maximum rate of population growth (rmax), coefficient of species interaction (αij), quantity of food resources required to maintain species equilibrium (Ji), and the coefficient of management efficacy (θi). We focused on the projected abundance of species by simulating interactions among one to four species, both invasive and native, on a hypothetical arid-tropical island that is 1000 ha in size and consists of five evenly distributed habitat types. Sensitivity analysis revealed significant variation in species abundance due to uncertainty in rmax (coefficient = 51.34; P < 0.001) and αij (Ni = −16.48; P = 0.43; Nj = −2.332; P = 2.00−16), a significant but potentially stabilizing effect of modeling multiple species simultaneously (coefficient = −65.80; P = 2.00−16), and mirroring by species response trajectories of threat mitigation trajectories. There are several benefits of using temporally dynamic models of species responses to threat mitigation in systematic conservation planning including increased accuracy in estimates of the cost of management; locally relevant understanding of lag-times between threat establishment and unacceptable impacts on valued species; understanding of threat abundance and required intensity of control for biodiversity features to persist; site- and species-specific understanding of time to eradication and threat recovery when management is interrupted; and an improved understanding of the opportunity cost, in terms of threat levels and responses of native species, for islands not selected for management. Our models and associated software are based on decades of ecological research, potentially useful in a wide range of situations, including islands, the mainland, and marine regions, and we suggest that they provide managers with novel and powerful tools to efficiently prioritize conservation actions via the new systematic conservation planning software, “Islands DSS.”

    KW - conservation planning

    KW - invasive species

    KW - sensitivity analysis

    KW - species response trajectory

    KW - threat mitigation

    U2 - 10.1002/ecs2.1822

    DO - 10.1002/ecs2.1822

    M3 - Article

    VL - 8

    JO - Ecosphere

    JF - Ecosphere

    SN - 2150-8925

    IS - 5

    ER -