Modelling of optimal training load patterns during the 11 weeks preceding major competition in elite swimmers

Philippe Hellard, Charlotte Scordia, Marta Avalos, Inigo Mujika, David B Pyne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Periodization of swim training in the final training phases prior to competition and its effect on performance have been poorly described. We modeled the relationships between the final 11 weeks of training and competition performance in 138 elite sprint, middle-distance, and long-distance swimmers over 20 competitive seasons. Total training load (TTL), strength training (ST), and low- to medium-intensity and high-intensity training variables were monitored. Training loads were scaled as a percentage of the maximal volume measured at each intensity level. Four training periods (meso-cycles) were defined: the taper (weeks 1 to 2 before competition), short-term (weeks 3 to 5), medium-term (weeks 6 to 8), and long-term (weeks 9 to 11). Mixed-effects models were used to analyze the association between training loads in each training meso-cycle and end-of-season major competition performance. For sprinters, a 10% increase between ∼20% and 70% of the TTL in medium- and long-term meso-cycles was associated with 0.07 s and 0.20 s faster performance in the 50 m and 100 m events, respectively (p < 0.01). For middle-distance swimmers, a higher TTL in short-, medium-, and long-term training yielded faster competition performance (e.g., a 10% increase in TTL was associated with improvements of 0.1–1.0 s in 200 m events and 0.3–1.6 s in 400 m freestyle, p < 0.01). For sprinters, a 60%–70% maximal ST load 6–8 weeks before competition induced the largest positive effects on performance (p < 0.01). An increase in TTL during the medium- and long-term preparation (6–11 weeks to competition) was associated with improved performance. Periodization plans should be adapted to the specialty of swimmers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1106-1117
Number of pages12
JournalApplied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism
Volume42
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Resistance Training

Cite this

Hellard, Philippe ; Scordia, Charlotte ; Avalos, Marta ; Mujika, Inigo ; Pyne, David B. / Modelling of optimal training load patterns during the 11 weeks preceding major competition in elite swimmers. In: Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism. 2017 ; Vol. 42, No. 10. pp. 1106-1117.
@article{17cbc4e5456d4c09b009d0edcfc318cf,
title = "Modelling of optimal training load patterns during the 11 weeks preceding major competition in elite swimmers",
abstract = "Periodization of swim training in the final training phases prior to competition and its effect on performance have been poorly described. We modeled the relationships between the final 11 weeks of training and competition performance in 138 elite sprint, middle-distance, and long-distance swimmers over 20 competitive seasons. Total training load (TTL), strength training (ST), and low- to medium-intensity and high-intensity training variables were monitored. Training loads were scaled as a percentage of the maximal volume measured at each intensity level. Four training periods (meso-cycles) were defined: the taper (weeks 1 to 2 before competition), short-term (weeks 3 to 5), medium-term (weeks 6 to 8), and long-term (weeks 9 to 11). Mixed-effects models were used to analyze the association between training loads in each training meso-cycle and end-of-season major competition performance. For sprinters, a 10{\%} increase between ∼20{\%} and 70{\%} of the TTL in medium- and long-term meso-cycles was associated with 0.07 s and 0.20 s faster performance in the 50 m and 100 m events, respectively (p < 0.01). For middle-distance swimmers, a higher TTL in short-, medium-, and long-term training yielded faster competition performance (e.g., a 10{\%} increase in TTL was associated with improvements of 0.1–1.0 s in 200 m events and 0.3–1.6 s in 400 m freestyle, p < 0.01). For sprinters, a 60{\%}–70{\%} maximal ST load 6–8 weeks before competition induced the largest positive effects on performance (p < 0.01). An increase in TTL during the medium- and long-term preparation (6–11 weeks to competition) was associated with improved performance. Periodization plans should be adapted to the specialty of swimmers.",
keywords = "Competition, Cubic splines, Mixed models, Periodization, Swimming",
author = "Philippe Hellard and Charlotte Scordia and Marta Avalos and Inigo Mujika and Pyne, {David B}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1139/apnm-2017-0180",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "1106--1117",
journal = "APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM",
issn = "1066-7814",
publisher = "National Research Council of Canada",
number = "10",

}

Modelling of optimal training load patterns during the 11 weeks preceding major competition in elite swimmers. / Hellard, Philippe; Scordia, Charlotte; Avalos, Marta; Mujika, Inigo; Pyne, David B.

In: Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism, Vol. 42, No. 10, 2017, p. 1106-1117.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modelling of optimal training load patterns during the 11 weeks preceding major competition in elite swimmers

AU - Hellard, Philippe

AU - Scordia, Charlotte

AU - Avalos, Marta

AU - Mujika, Inigo

AU - Pyne, David B

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Periodization of swim training in the final training phases prior to competition and its effect on performance have been poorly described. We modeled the relationships between the final 11 weeks of training and competition performance in 138 elite sprint, middle-distance, and long-distance swimmers over 20 competitive seasons. Total training load (TTL), strength training (ST), and low- to medium-intensity and high-intensity training variables were monitored. Training loads were scaled as a percentage of the maximal volume measured at each intensity level. Four training periods (meso-cycles) were defined: the taper (weeks 1 to 2 before competition), short-term (weeks 3 to 5), medium-term (weeks 6 to 8), and long-term (weeks 9 to 11). Mixed-effects models were used to analyze the association between training loads in each training meso-cycle and end-of-season major competition performance. For sprinters, a 10% increase between ∼20% and 70% of the TTL in medium- and long-term meso-cycles was associated with 0.07 s and 0.20 s faster performance in the 50 m and 100 m events, respectively (p < 0.01). For middle-distance swimmers, a higher TTL in short-, medium-, and long-term training yielded faster competition performance (e.g., a 10% increase in TTL was associated with improvements of 0.1–1.0 s in 200 m events and 0.3–1.6 s in 400 m freestyle, p < 0.01). For sprinters, a 60%–70% maximal ST load 6–8 weeks before competition induced the largest positive effects on performance (p < 0.01). An increase in TTL during the medium- and long-term preparation (6–11 weeks to competition) was associated with improved performance. Periodization plans should be adapted to the specialty of swimmers.

AB - Periodization of swim training in the final training phases prior to competition and its effect on performance have been poorly described. We modeled the relationships between the final 11 weeks of training and competition performance in 138 elite sprint, middle-distance, and long-distance swimmers over 20 competitive seasons. Total training load (TTL), strength training (ST), and low- to medium-intensity and high-intensity training variables were monitored. Training loads were scaled as a percentage of the maximal volume measured at each intensity level. Four training periods (meso-cycles) were defined: the taper (weeks 1 to 2 before competition), short-term (weeks 3 to 5), medium-term (weeks 6 to 8), and long-term (weeks 9 to 11). Mixed-effects models were used to analyze the association between training loads in each training meso-cycle and end-of-season major competition performance. For sprinters, a 10% increase between ∼20% and 70% of the TTL in medium- and long-term meso-cycles was associated with 0.07 s and 0.20 s faster performance in the 50 m and 100 m events, respectively (p < 0.01). For middle-distance swimmers, a higher TTL in short-, medium-, and long-term training yielded faster competition performance (e.g., a 10% increase in TTL was associated with improvements of 0.1–1.0 s in 200 m events and 0.3–1.6 s in 400 m freestyle, p < 0.01). For sprinters, a 60%–70% maximal ST load 6–8 weeks before competition induced the largest positive effects on performance (p < 0.01). An increase in TTL during the medium- and long-term preparation (6–11 weeks to competition) was associated with improved performance. Periodization plans should be adapted to the specialty of swimmers.

KW - Competition

KW - Cubic splines

KW - Mixed models

KW - Periodization

KW - Swimming

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030236189&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/modelling-optimal-training-load-patterns-during-11-weeks-preceding-major-competition-elite-swimmers

U2 - 10.1139/apnm-2017-0180

DO - 10.1139/apnm-2017-0180

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 1106

EP - 1117

JO - APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM

JF - APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM

SN - 1066-7814

IS - 10

ER -