Moral economies of the welfare state

A qualitative comparative study

Peter Taylor-Gooby, Bjørn Hvinden, Steffen Mau, Benjamin Leruth, Mi Ah Schoyen, Adrienn Gyory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper uses innovative democratic forums carried out in Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom to examine people’s ideas about welfare-state priorities and future prospects. We use a moral economy framework in the context of regime differences and the move towards neo-liberalism across Europe. Broadly speaking, attitudes reflect regime differences, with distinctive emphasis on reciprocity and the value of work in Germany, inclusion and equality in Norway, and individual responsibility and the work-ethic in the UK. Neo-liberal market-centred ideas appear to have made little headway in regard to popular attitudes, except in the already liberal-leaning UK. There is also a striking assumption by UK participants that welfare is threatened externally by immigrants who take jobs from established workers and internally by the work-shy who undermine the work-ethic. A key role of the welfare state is repressive rather than enabling: to protect against threats to well-being rather than provide benefits for citizens. UK participants also anticipate major decline in state provision. In all three countries there is strong support for continuing and expanding social investment policies, but for different reasons: to enable contribution in Germany, to promote equality and mobility in Norway, and to facilitate self-responsibility in the UK.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)119-134
Number of pages16
JournalActa Sociologica (United Kingdom)
Volume62
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2019

Fingerprint

welfare state
Norway
economy
equality
moral philosophy
self-responsibility
regime
social investment
investment policy
reciprocity
neoliberalism
well-being
welfare
immigrant
inclusion
threat
citizen
worker
responsibility
market

Cite this

Taylor-Gooby, P., Hvinden, B., Mau, S., Leruth, B., Schoyen, M. A., & Gyory, A. (2019). Moral economies of the welfare state: A qualitative comparative study. Acta Sociologica (United Kingdom), 62(2), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699318774835
Taylor-Gooby, Peter ; Hvinden, Bjørn ; Mau, Steffen ; Leruth, Benjamin ; Schoyen, Mi Ah ; Gyory, Adrienn. / Moral economies of the welfare state : A qualitative comparative study. In: Acta Sociologica (United Kingdom). 2019 ; Vol. 62, No. 2. pp. 119-134.
@article{9f10aa6dc6534301b12c4ae001353c76,
title = "Moral economies of the welfare state: A qualitative comparative study",
abstract = "This paper uses innovative democratic forums carried out in Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom to examine people’s ideas about welfare-state priorities and future prospects. We use a moral economy framework in the context of regime differences and the move towards neo-liberalism across Europe. Broadly speaking, attitudes reflect regime differences, with distinctive emphasis on reciprocity and the value of work in Germany, inclusion and equality in Norway, and individual responsibility and the work-ethic in the UK. Neo-liberal market-centred ideas appear to have made little headway in regard to popular attitudes, except in the already liberal-leaning UK. There is also a striking assumption by UK participants that welfare is threatened externally by immigrants who take jobs from established workers and internally by the work-shy who undermine the work-ethic. A key role of the welfare state is repressive rather than enabling: to protect against threats to well-being rather than provide benefits for citizens. UK participants also anticipate major decline in state provision. In all three countries there is strong support for continuing and expanding social investment policies, but for different reasons: to enable contribution in Germany, to promote equality and mobility in Norway, and to facilitate self-responsibility in the UK.",
keywords = "Attitudes, democratic forum, Europe, immigration, inequality, moral economy, neo-liberalism, welfare state",
author = "Peter Taylor-Gooby and Bj{\o}rn Hvinden and Steffen Mau and Benjamin Leruth and Schoyen, {Mi Ah} and Adrienn Gyory",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0001699318774835",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "119--134",
journal = "Acta Sociologica",
issn = "0001-6993",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Taylor-Gooby, P, Hvinden, B, Mau, S, Leruth, B, Schoyen, MA & Gyory, A 2019, 'Moral economies of the welfare state: A qualitative comparative study', Acta Sociologica (United Kingdom), vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699318774835

Moral economies of the welfare state : A qualitative comparative study. / Taylor-Gooby, Peter; Hvinden, Bjørn; Mau, Steffen; Leruth, Benjamin; Schoyen, Mi Ah; Gyory, Adrienn.

In: Acta Sociologica (United Kingdom), Vol. 62, No. 2, 01.05.2019, p. 119-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Moral economies of the welfare state

T2 - A qualitative comparative study

AU - Taylor-Gooby, Peter

AU - Hvinden, Bjørn

AU - Mau, Steffen

AU - Leruth, Benjamin

AU - Schoyen, Mi Ah

AU - Gyory, Adrienn

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - This paper uses innovative democratic forums carried out in Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom to examine people’s ideas about welfare-state priorities and future prospects. We use a moral economy framework in the context of regime differences and the move towards neo-liberalism across Europe. Broadly speaking, attitudes reflect regime differences, with distinctive emphasis on reciprocity and the value of work in Germany, inclusion and equality in Norway, and individual responsibility and the work-ethic in the UK. Neo-liberal market-centred ideas appear to have made little headway in regard to popular attitudes, except in the already liberal-leaning UK. There is also a striking assumption by UK participants that welfare is threatened externally by immigrants who take jobs from established workers and internally by the work-shy who undermine the work-ethic. A key role of the welfare state is repressive rather than enabling: to protect against threats to well-being rather than provide benefits for citizens. UK participants also anticipate major decline in state provision. In all three countries there is strong support for continuing and expanding social investment policies, but for different reasons: to enable contribution in Germany, to promote equality and mobility in Norway, and to facilitate self-responsibility in the UK.

AB - This paper uses innovative democratic forums carried out in Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom to examine people’s ideas about welfare-state priorities and future prospects. We use a moral economy framework in the context of regime differences and the move towards neo-liberalism across Europe. Broadly speaking, attitudes reflect regime differences, with distinctive emphasis on reciprocity and the value of work in Germany, inclusion and equality in Norway, and individual responsibility and the work-ethic in the UK. Neo-liberal market-centred ideas appear to have made little headway in regard to popular attitudes, except in the already liberal-leaning UK. There is also a striking assumption by UK participants that welfare is threatened externally by immigrants who take jobs from established workers and internally by the work-shy who undermine the work-ethic. A key role of the welfare state is repressive rather than enabling: to protect against threats to well-being rather than provide benefits for citizens. UK participants also anticipate major decline in state provision. In all three countries there is strong support for continuing and expanding social investment policies, but for different reasons: to enable contribution in Germany, to promote equality and mobility in Norway, and to facilitate self-responsibility in the UK.

KW - Attitudes

KW - democratic forum

KW - Europe

KW - immigration

KW - inequality

KW - moral economy

KW - neo-liberalism

KW - welfare state

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048865852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/moral-economies-welfare-state-qualitative-comparative-study

U2 - 10.1177/0001699318774835

DO - 10.1177/0001699318774835

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 119

EP - 134

JO - Acta Sociologica

JF - Acta Sociologica

SN - 0001-6993

IS - 2

ER -

Taylor-Gooby P, Hvinden B, Mau S, Leruth B, Schoyen MA, Gyory A. Moral economies of the welfare state: A qualitative comparative study. Acta Sociologica (United Kingdom). 2019 May 1;62(2):119-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699318774835