More, longer, tougher… or is it finally time for a different approach to the post-sentence management of sex offenders in Australia?

Lorana BARTELS, Jamie Walvisch, Kelly Richards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The public desire to ‘do something’ about sex offenders has led juridictions around the world to introduce a range of post-sentence measures, such as sex offender registries, community notification and preventive detention. In Australia, the pace of legislative reform in this area has been particularly frenetic since 2016, with almost all jurisdictions enacting at least one substantive piece of legislation. This article analyses these recent reforms, arguing that while they have been extensive in number, they have not been extensive in nature: governments have simply sought to do more of the same, even though there is little evidence to suggest that this is likely to improve community safety.

By contrast, evaluations of some more innovative approaches that have been taken to managing sex offenders suggest that these approaches may be effective in assisting those offenders to reintegrate into communities and in reducing reoffending. The article discusses three of these approaches: Circles of Support and Accountability; Chaperone Programs; and Support and Awareness Groups. We suggest that, if governments are truly committed to the goal of enhancing community safety, approaches of this nature seem a better target for public investment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-57
Number of pages17
JournalAustralian Criminal Law Journal
Volume43
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

offender
management
community
preventive detention
reform
public investment
jurisdiction
legislation
responsibility
time
evaluation
evidence
Group

Cite this

@article{2ba3f2901c8b4f899d3eac2c5ceb035c,
title = "More, longer, tougher… or is it finally time for a different approach to the post-sentence management of sex offenders in Australia?",
abstract = "The public desire to ‘do something’ about sex offenders has led juridictions around the world to introduce a range of post-sentence measures, such as sex offender registries, community notification and preventive detention. In Australia, the pace of legislative reform in this area has been particularly frenetic since 2016, with almost all jurisdictions enacting at least one substantive piece of legislation. This article analyses these recent reforms, arguing that while they have been extensive in number, they have not been extensive in nature: governments have simply sought to do more of the same, even though there is little evidence to suggest that this is likely to improve community safety.By contrast, evaluations of some more innovative approaches that have been taken to managing sex offenders suggest that these approaches may be effective in assisting those offenders to reintegrate into communities and in reducing reoffending. The article discusses three of these approaches: Circles of Support and Accountability; Chaperone Programs; and Support and Awareness Groups. We suggest that, if governments are truly committed to the goal of enhancing community safety, approaches of this nature seem a better target for public investment.",
author = "Lorana BARTELS and Jamie Walvisch and Kelly Richards",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "41--57",
journal = "Australian Criminal Law Journal",
issn = "1321-6562",
number = "1",

}

More, longer, tougher… or is it finally time for a different approach to the post-sentence management of sex offenders in Australia? / BARTELS, Lorana; Walvisch, Jamie ; Richards, Kelly.

In: Australian Criminal Law Journal , Vol. 43, No. 1, 2019, p. 41-57.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - More, longer, tougher… or is it finally time for a different approach to the post-sentence management of sex offenders in Australia?

AU - BARTELS, Lorana

AU - Walvisch, Jamie

AU - Richards, Kelly

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The public desire to ‘do something’ about sex offenders has led juridictions around the world to introduce a range of post-sentence measures, such as sex offender registries, community notification and preventive detention. In Australia, the pace of legislative reform in this area has been particularly frenetic since 2016, with almost all jurisdictions enacting at least one substantive piece of legislation. This article analyses these recent reforms, arguing that while they have been extensive in number, they have not been extensive in nature: governments have simply sought to do more of the same, even though there is little evidence to suggest that this is likely to improve community safety.By contrast, evaluations of some more innovative approaches that have been taken to managing sex offenders suggest that these approaches may be effective in assisting those offenders to reintegrate into communities and in reducing reoffending. The article discusses three of these approaches: Circles of Support and Accountability; Chaperone Programs; and Support and Awareness Groups. We suggest that, if governments are truly committed to the goal of enhancing community safety, approaches of this nature seem a better target for public investment.

AB - The public desire to ‘do something’ about sex offenders has led juridictions around the world to introduce a range of post-sentence measures, such as sex offender registries, community notification and preventive detention. In Australia, the pace of legislative reform in this area has been particularly frenetic since 2016, with almost all jurisdictions enacting at least one substantive piece of legislation. This article analyses these recent reforms, arguing that while they have been extensive in number, they have not been extensive in nature: governments have simply sought to do more of the same, even though there is little evidence to suggest that this is likely to improve community safety.By contrast, evaluations of some more innovative approaches that have been taken to managing sex offenders suggest that these approaches may be effective in assisting those offenders to reintegrate into communities and in reducing reoffending. The article discusses three of these approaches: Circles of Support and Accountability; Chaperone Programs; and Support and Awareness Groups. We suggest that, if governments are truly committed to the goal of enhancing community safety, approaches of this nature seem a better target for public investment.

UR - https://eprints.qut.edu.au/126708/

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 41

EP - 57

JO - Australian Criminal Law Journal

JF - Australian Criminal Law Journal

SN - 1321-6562

IS - 1

ER -