More on the Liang Bua finds and modern human cretins

Charles Oxnard, Peter Obendorf, Ben Kefford, John Dennison

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    9 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Brown (2012: LB1 and LB6 Homo floresiensis are not modern human (Homo sapiens) cretins, Journal of Human Evolution) makes errors of fact, omission and interpretation. Brown’s comments refer, among others, to (1) delayed growth and development indicated by unfused epiphyses, (2) postcranial limb proportions: limbs to trunk, between limbs, and within limbs, (3) postcranial bone torsions and angles, (4) postcranial robusticity, real and apparent, (5) skull features, and (6) cretinism on Flores. In each of these areas, much information about cretins is incorrect and much information (Oxnard et al., 2010) comparing the Liang Bua remains with cretins is ignored.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)407-412
    Number of pages6
    JournalHOMO
    Volume63
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

      Fingerprint

    Cite this