Mothers who kill: The forensic use and judicial reception of evidence of postnatal depression and other psychiatric disorders in Australian filicide cases

Lorana BARTELS, Patricia EASTEAL

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article examines Australian legal responses to filicide in circumstances where mothers have killed their young children. We consider the potential legal defences that may be raised where postnatal depression ('PND') and other psychiatric disorders are present in cases of filicide: insanity/mental impairment, diminished responsibility/substantial impairment by abnormality of mind, and infanticide. We then examine 28 cases of filicide, including both cases where PND evidence was adduced, and cases where PND evidence was not adduced but other mental health issues were considered. We look at the forensic use of and judicial responses to PND and other evidence of mental illness: how do medical practitioners and judicial officers present impairment of the defendant's mental capacity? We also speculate on differences in sentencing outcomes and consider the policy and research implications of our findings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)297-341
Number of pages45
JournalMelbourne University Law Review
Volume37
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

evidence
mental illness
mental health
responsibility
present

Cite this

@article{623fa0ae50c54b75aca33ec14e27877e,
title = "Mothers who kill: The forensic use and judicial reception of evidence of postnatal depression and other psychiatric disorders in Australian filicide cases",
abstract = "This article examines Australian legal responses to filicide in circumstances where mothers have killed their young children. We consider the potential legal defences that may be raised where postnatal depression ('PND') and other psychiatric disorders are present in cases of filicide: insanity/mental impairment, diminished responsibility/substantial impairment by abnormality of mind, and infanticide. We then examine 28 cases of filicide, including both cases where PND evidence was adduced, and cases where PND evidence was not adduced but other mental health issues were considered. We look at the forensic use of and judicial responses to PND and other evidence of mental illness: how do medical practitioners and judicial officers present impairment of the defendant's mental capacity? We also speculate on differences in sentencing outcomes and consider the policy and research implications of our findings.",
keywords = "filicide and expert evidence, infanticide and expert evidence, post natal depression",
author = "Lorana BARTELS and Patricia EASTEAL",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "297--341",
journal = "Melbourne University Law Review",
issn = "0025-8938",
publisher = "Melbourne University Law Review",
number = "2",

}

Mothers who kill: The forensic use and judicial reception of evidence of postnatal depression and other psychiatric disorders in Australian filicide cases. / BARTELS, Lorana; EASTEAL, Patricia.

In: Melbourne University Law Review, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2013, p. 297-341.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mothers who kill: The forensic use and judicial reception of evidence of postnatal depression and other psychiatric disorders in Australian filicide cases

AU - BARTELS, Lorana

AU - EASTEAL, Patricia

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This article examines Australian legal responses to filicide in circumstances where mothers have killed their young children. We consider the potential legal defences that may be raised where postnatal depression ('PND') and other psychiatric disorders are present in cases of filicide: insanity/mental impairment, diminished responsibility/substantial impairment by abnormality of mind, and infanticide. We then examine 28 cases of filicide, including both cases where PND evidence was adduced, and cases where PND evidence was not adduced but other mental health issues were considered. We look at the forensic use of and judicial responses to PND and other evidence of mental illness: how do medical practitioners and judicial officers present impairment of the defendant's mental capacity? We also speculate on differences in sentencing outcomes and consider the policy and research implications of our findings.

AB - This article examines Australian legal responses to filicide in circumstances where mothers have killed their young children. We consider the potential legal defences that may be raised where postnatal depression ('PND') and other psychiatric disorders are present in cases of filicide: insanity/mental impairment, diminished responsibility/substantial impairment by abnormality of mind, and infanticide. We then examine 28 cases of filicide, including both cases where PND evidence was adduced, and cases where PND evidence was not adduced but other mental health issues were considered. We look at the forensic use of and judicial responses to PND and other evidence of mental illness: how do medical practitioners and judicial officers present impairment of the defendant's mental capacity? We also speculate on differences in sentencing outcomes and consider the policy and research implications of our findings.

KW - filicide and expert evidence

KW - infanticide and expert evidence

KW - post natal depression

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 297

EP - 341

JO - Melbourne University Law Review

JF - Melbourne University Law Review

SN - 0025-8938

IS - 2

ER -