Moving Beyond Traditional Cash Measures of Economic Well-Being: Including Indirect Benefits and Indirect Taxes

Ann Harding, Neil Warren, Rachel Lloyd

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

    Abstract

    Most studies of economic well-being now use equivalent disposable income as their measure of resources, ignoring the benefits of publicly provided goods and services and the impact of all sources of taxation apart from income tax and social security contributions. This study of the UK and Australia includes health, education and housing indirect benefits and a range of indirect taxes, and suggests that in both countries indirect benefits are not as progressive in their incidence as direct benefits, but are nonetheless unambiguously pro-poor. The study also indicates that the usual exclusion of indirect taxes from income analyses results in an unduly optimistic view of the extent of income redistribution achieved by welfare states
    Original languageEnglish
    Place of PublicationCanberra
    PublisherUniversity of Canberra
    Pages1-42
    Number of pages42
    Volume61
    Publication statusPublished - 2006

    Fingerprint

    Indirect taxes
    Economic well-being
    Cash
    Income
    Income tax
    Health education
    Resources
    Income redistribution
    Social security contributions
    Exclusion
    Taxation
    Welfare state

    Cite this

    Harding, A., Warren, N., & Lloyd, R. (2006). Moving Beyond Traditional Cash Measures of Economic Well-Being: Including Indirect Benefits and Indirect Taxes. (pp. 1-42). Canberra: University of Canberra.
    Harding, Ann ; Warren, Neil ; Lloyd, Rachel. / Moving Beyond Traditional Cash Measures of Economic Well-Being: Including Indirect Benefits and Indirect Taxes. Canberra : University of Canberra, 2006. pp. 1-42
    @techreport{17d498b8f3d84f14890ec4c230156cb0,
    title = "Moving Beyond Traditional Cash Measures of Economic Well-Being: Including Indirect Benefits and Indirect Taxes",
    abstract = "Most studies of economic well-being now use equivalent disposable income as their measure of resources, ignoring the benefits of publicly provided goods and services and the impact of all sources of taxation apart from income tax and social security contributions. This study of the UK and Australia includes health, education and housing indirect benefits and a range of indirect taxes, and suggests that in both countries indirect benefits are not as progressive in their incidence as direct benefits, but are nonetheless unambiguously pro-poor. The study also indicates that the usual exclusion of indirect taxes from income analyses results in an unduly optimistic view of the extent of income redistribution achieved by welfare states",
    author = "Ann Harding and Neil Warren and Rachel Lloyd",
    year = "2006",
    language = "English",
    volume = "61",
    pages = "1--42",
    publisher = "University of Canberra",
    type = "WorkingPaper",
    institution = "University of Canberra",

    }

    Harding, A, Warren, N & Lloyd, R 2006 'Moving Beyond Traditional Cash Measures of Economic Well-Being: Including Indirect Benefits and Indirect Taxes' University of Canberra, Canberra, pp. 1-42.

    Moving Beyond Traditional Cash Measures of Economic Well-Being: Including Indirect Benefits and Indirect Taxes. / Harding, Ann; Warren, Neil; Lloyd, Rachel.

    Canberra : University of Canberra, 2006. p. 1-42.

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

    TY - UNPB

    T1 - Moving Beyond Traditional Cash Measures of Economic Well-Being: Including Indirect Benefits and Indirect Taxes

    AU - Harding, Ann

    AU - Warren, Neil

    AU - Lloyd, Rachel

    PY - 2006

    Y1 - 2006

    N2 - Most studies of economic well-being now use equivalent disposable income as their measure of resources, ignoring the benefits of publicly provided goods and services and the impact of all sources of taxation apart from income tax and social security contributions. This study of the UK and Australia includes health, education and housing indirect benefits and a range of indirect taxes, and suggests that in both countries indirect benefits are not as progressive in their incidence as direct benefits, but are nonetheless unambiguously pro-poor. The study also indicates that the usual exclusion of indirect taxes from income analyses results in an unduly optimistic view of the extent of income redistribution achieved by welfare states

    AB - Most studies of economic well-being now use equivalent disposable income as their measure of resources, ignoring the benefits of publicly provided goods and services and the impact of all sources of taxation apart from income tax and social security contributions. This study of the UK and Australia includes health, education and housing indirect benefits and a range of indirect taxes, and suggests that in both countries indirect benefits are not as progressive in their incidence as direct benefits, but are nonetheless unambiguously pro-poor. The study also indicates that the usual exclusion of indirect taxes from income analyses results in an unduly optimistic view of the extent of income redistribution achieved by welfare states

    M3 - Discussion paper

    VL - 61

    SP - 1

    EP - 42

    BT - Moving Beyond Traditional Cash Measures of Economic Well-Being: Including Indirect Benefits and Indirect Taxes

    PB - University of Canberra

    CY - Canberra

    ER -

    Harding A, Warren N, Lloyd R. Moving Beyond Traditional Cash Measures of Economic Well-Being: Including Indirect Benefits and Indirect Taxes. Canberra: University of Canberra. 2006, p. 1-42.