TY - JOUR
T1 - Multi-observer contouring of male pelvic anatomy
T2 - Highly variable agreement across conventional and emerging structures of interest
AU - Roach, Dale
AU - Holloway, Lois C.
AU - Jameson, Michael G.
AU - Dowling, Jason A.
AU - Kennedy, Angel
AU - Greer, Peter B.
AU - Krawiec, Michele
AU - Rai, Robba
AU - Denham, Jim
AU - De Leon, Jeremiah
AU - Lim, Karen
AU - Berry, Megan E.
AU - White, Rohen T.
AU - Bydder, Sean A.
AU - Tan, Hendrick T.
AU - Croker, Jeremy D.
AU - McGrath, Alycea
AU - Matthews, John
AU - Smeenk, Robert J.
AU - Ebert, Martin A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The project was funded by NHMRC project grant number 1077788.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists
PY - 2019/4
Y1 - 2019/4
N2 - Introduction: This study quantified inter-observer contouring variations for multiple male pelvic structures, many of which are of emerging relevance for prostate cancer radiotherapy progression and toxicity response studies. Methods: Five prostate cancer patient datasets (CT and T2-weighted MR) were distributed to 13 observers for contouring. CT structures contoured included the clinical target volume (CTV), seminal vesicles, rectum, colon, bowel bag, bladder and peri-rectal space (PRS). MR contours included CTV, trigone, membranous urethra, penile bulb, neurovascular bundle and multiple pelvic floor muscles. Contouring variations were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and multiple additional metrics. Results: Clinical target volume (CT and MR), bladder, rectum and PRS contours showed excellent inter-observer agreement (median ICC = 0.97; 0.99; 1.00; 0.95; 0.90, DSC = 0.83 ± 0.05; 0.88 ± 0.05; 0.93 ± 0.03; 0.81 ± 0.07; 0.80 ± 0.06, respectively). Seminal vesicle contours were more variable (ICC = 0.75, DSC = 0.73 ± 0.14), while colon and bowel bag contoured volumes were consistent (ICC = 0.97; 0.97), but displayed poor overlap (DSC = 0.58 ± 0.22; 0.67 ± 0.21). Smaller MR structures showed significant inter-observer variations, with poor overlap for trigone, membranous urethra, penile bulb, and left and right neurovascular bundles (DSC = 0.44 ± 0.22; 0.41 ± 0.21; 0.66 ± 0.21; 0.16 ± 0.17; 0.15 ± 0.15). Pelvic floor muscles recorded moderate to strong inter-observer agreement (ICC = 0.50–0.97), although large outlier variations were observed. Conclusions: Inter-observer contouring variation was significant for multiple pelvic structures contoured on MR.
AB - Introduction: This study quantified inter-observer contouring variations for multiple male pelvic structures, many of which are of emerging relevance for prostate cancer radiotherapy progression and toxicity response studies. Methods: Five prostate cancer patient datasets (CT and T2-weighted MR) were distributed to 13 observers for contouring. CT structures contoured included the clinical target volume (CTV), seminal vesicles, rectum, colon, bowel bag, bladder and peri-rectal space (PRS). MR contours included CTV, trigone, membranous urethra, penile bulb, neurovascular bundle and multiple pelvic floor muscles. Contouring variations were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and multiple additional metrics. Results: Clinical target volume (CT and MR), bladder, rectum and PRS contours showed excellent inter-observer agreement (median ICC = 0.97; 0.99; 1.00; 0.95; 0.90, DSC = 0.83 ± 0.05; 0.88 ± 0.05; 0.93 ± 0.03; 0.81 ± 0.07; 0.80 ± 0.06, respectively). Seminal vesicle contours were more variable (ICC = 0.75, DSC = 0.73 ± 0.14), while colon and bowel bag contoured volumes were consistent (ICC = 0.97; 0.97), but displayed poor overlap (DSC = 0.58 ± 0.22; 0.67 ± 0.21). Smaller MR structures showed significant inter-observer variations, with poor overlap for trigone, membranous urethra, penile bulb, and left and right neurovascular bundles (DSC = 0.44 ± 0.22; 0.41 ± 0.21; 0.66 ± 0.21; 0.16 ± 0.17; 0.15 ± 0.15). Pelvic floor muscles recorded moderate to strong inter-observer agreement (ICC = 0.50–0.97), although large outlier variations were observed. Conclusions: Inter-observer contouring variation was significant for multiple pelvic structures contoured on MR.
KW - contouring
KW - delineation
KW - inter/intra-observer variability
KW - prostate
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059553176&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1754-9485.12844
DO - 10.1111/1754-9485.12844
M3 - Article
C2 - 30609205
AN - SCOPUS:85059553176
SN - 1754-9477
VL - 63
SP - 264
EP - 271
JO - Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology
JF - Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology
IS - 2
ER -