Multidisciplinary team care arrangements in the management of patients with chronic disease in Australian general practice

Mark F. Harris, Upali W. Jayasinghe, Jane Taggart, Bettina Christl, Judy Proudfoot, Patrick CROOKES, Justin Beilby, Gawaine Powell Davies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To explore factors associated with the frequency of multidisciplinary Team Care Arrangements (TCAs) and the impact of TCAs on patient-assessed quality of care in Australian general practice. Design and setting: Data were collected as part of a cluster randomised controlled trial conducted in 60 general practices in New South Wales, the Australian Capital Territory and Victoria between July 2006 and June 2008. Multilevel logistic regression analysis evaluated factors associated with the frequency of TCAs recorded in the 12 months after baseline, and multilevel multivariable analysis examined the association between TCAs and patient-assessed quality of chronic illness care, adjusted for patient and practice characteristics. Main outcome measures: Frequency of TCAs; Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) scores. Results: Of 1752 patients with clinical audit data available at 12-month follow-up, 398 (22.7%) had a TCA put in place since baseline. Women, patients with two or more chronic conditions, and patients from metropolitan areas had an increased probability of having a TCA. There was an association between TCAs and practices with solo general practitioners and those with greater levels of teamwork involving non-GP staff for the control group but not the intervention group. Patients who had a TCA self-assessed their quality of care (measured by PACIC scores) to be higher than those who did not. Conclusions: Findings were consistent with the purpose of TCAs - to provide multidisciplinary care for patients with longer-term complex conditions. Significant barriers to TCA use remain, especially in rural areas and for men, and these may be more challenging to overcome in larger practices.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)236-239
Number of pages4
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Volume194
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

General Practice
Chronic Disease
Quality of Health Care
Patient Care
Australian Capital Territory
Clinical Audit
Multilevel Analysis
Patient Care Team
New South Wales
Victoria
Private Practice
Self Care
General Practitioners
Randomized Controlled Trials
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Control Groups

Cite this

Harris, M. F., Jayasinghe, U. W., Taggart, J., Christl, B., Proudfoot, J., CROOKES, P., ... Powell Davies, G. (2011). Multidisciplinary team care arrangements in the management of patients with chronic disease in Australian general practice. Medical Journal of Australia, 194(5), 236-239.
Harris, Mark F. ; Jayasinghe, Upali W. ; Taggart, Jane ; Christl, Bettina ; Proudfoot, Judy ; CROOKES, Patrick ; Beilby, Justin ; Powell Davies, Gawaine. / Multidisciplinary team care arrangements in the management of patients with chronic disease in Australian general practice. In: Medical Journal of Australia. 2011 ; Vol. 194, No. 5. pp. 236-239.
@article{b7b261ee1c564c6a8e1358f9814a7beb,
title = "Multidisciplinary team care arrangements in the management of patients with chronic disease in Australian general practice",
abstract = "Objective: To explore factors associated with the frequency of multidisciplinary Team Care Arrangements (TCAs) and the impact of TCAs on patient-assessed quality of care in Australian general practice. Design and setting: Data were collected as part of a cluster randomised controlled trial conducted in 60 general practices in New South Wales, the Australian Capital Territory and Victoria between July 2006 and June 2008. Multilevel logistic regression analysis evaluated factors associated with the frequency of TCAs recorded in the 12 months after baseline, and multilevel multivariable analysis examined the association between TCAs and patient-assessed quality of chronic illness care, adjusted for patient and practice characteristics. Main outcome measures: Frequency of TCAs; Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) scores. Results: Of 1752 patients with clinical audit data available at 12-month follow-up, 398 (22.7{\%}) had a TCA put in place since baseline. Women, patients with two or more chronic conditions, and patients from metropolitan areas had an increased probability of having a TCA. There was an association between TCAs and practices with solo general practitioners and those with greater levels of teamwork involving non-GP staff for the control group but not the intervention group. Patients who had a TCA self-assessed their quality of care (measured by PACIC scores) to be higher than those who did not. Conclusions: Findings were consistent with the purpose of TCAs - to provide multidisciplinary care for patients with longer-term complex conditions. Significant barriers to TCA use remain, especially in rural areas and for men, and these may be more challenging to overcome in larger practices.",
author = "Harris, {Mark F.} and Jayasinghe, {Upali W.} and Jane Taggart and Bettina Christl and Judy Proudfoot and Patrick CROOKES and Justin Beilby and {Powell Davies}, Gawaine",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
volume = "194",
pages = "236--239",
journal = "Medical Journal of Australia",
issn = "0025-729X",
publisher = "Australasian Medical Publishing Co. Ltd",
number = "5",

}

Harris, MF, Jayasinghe, UW, Taggart, J, Christl, B, Proudfoot, J, CROOKES, P, Beilby, J & Powell Davies, G 2011, 'Multidisciplinary team care arrangements in the management of patients with chronic disease in Australian general practice', Medical Journal of Australia, vol. 194, no. 5, pp. 236-239.

Multidisciplinary team care arrangements in the management of patients with chronic disease in Australian general practice. / Harris, Mark F.; Jayasinghe, Upali W.; Taggart, Jane; Christl, Bettina; Proudfoot, Judy; CROOKES, Patrick; Beilby, Justin; Powell Davies, Gawaine.

In: Medical Journal of Australia, Vol. 194, No. 5, 2011, p. 236-239.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multidisciplinary team care arrangements in the management of patients with chronic disease in Australian general practice

AU - Harris, Mark F.

AU - Jayasinghe, Upali W.

AU - Taggart, Jane

AU - Christl, Bettina

AU - Proudfoot, Judy

AU - CROOKES, Patrick

AU - Beilby, Justin

AU - Powell Davies, Gawaine

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Objective: To explore factors associated with the frequency of multidisciplinary Team Care Arrangements (TCAs) and the impact of TCAs on patient-assessed quality of care in Australian general practice. Design and setting: Data were collected as part of a cluster randomised controlled trial conducted in 60 general practices in New South Wales, the Australian Capital Territory and Victoria between July 2006 and June 2008. Multilevel logistic regression analysis evaluated factors associated with the frequency of TCAs recorded in the 12 months after baseline, and multilevel multivariable analysis examined the association between TCAs and patient-assessed quality of chronic illness care, adjusted for patient and practice characteristics. Main outcome measures: Frequency of TCAs; Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) scores. Results: Of 1752 patients with clinical audit data available at 12-month follow-up, 398 (22.7%) had a TCA put in place since baseline. Women, patients with two or more chronic conditions, and patients from metropolitan areas had an increased probability of having a TCA. There was an association between TCAs and practices with solo general practitioners and those with greater levels of teamwork involving non-GP staff for the control group but not the intervention group. Patients who had a TCA self-assessed their quality of care (measured by PACIC scores) to be higher than those who did not. Conclusions: Findings were consistent with the purpose of TCAs - to provide multidisciplinary care for patients with longer-term complex conditions. Significant barriers to TCA use remain, especially in rural areas and for men, and these may be more challenging to overcome in larger practices.

AB - Objective: To explore factors associated with the frequency of multidisciplinary Team Care Arrangements (TCAs) and the impact of TCAs on patient-assessed quality of care in Australian general practice. Design and setting: Data were collected as part of a cluster randomised controlled trial conducted in 60 general practices in New South Wales, the Australian Capital Territory and Victoria between July 2006 and June 2008. Multilevel logistic regression analysis evaluated factors associated with the frequency of TCAs recorded in the 12 months after baseline, and multilevel multivariable analysis examined the association between TCAs and patient-assessed quality of chronic illness care, adjusted for patient and practice characteristics. Main outcome measures: Frequency of TCAs; Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) scores. Results: Of 1752 patients with clinical audit data available at 12-month follow-up, 398 (22.7%) had a TCA put in place since baseline. Women, patients with two or more chronic conditions, and patients from metropolitan areas had an increased probability of having a TCA. There was an association between TCAs and practices with solo general practitioners and those with greater levels of teamwork involving non-GP staff for the control group but not the intervention group. Patients who had a TCA self-assessed their quality of care (measured by PACIC scores) to be higher than those who did not. Conclusions: Findings were consistent with the purpose of TCAs - to provide multidisciplinary care for patients with longer-term complex conditions. Significant barriers to TCA use remain, especially in rural areas and for men, and these may be more challenging to overcome in larger practices.

M3 - Article

VL - 194

SP - 236

EP - 239

JO - Medical Journal of Australia

JF - Medical Journal of Australia

SN - 0025-729X

IS - 5

ER -