TY - JOUR
T1 - Multimodal physiological sensing for the assessment of acute pain
AU - Fernendez-Rojas, Raul
AU - Hirachan, Niraj
AU - Brown, Nick
AU - Waddington, Gordon
AU - Murtagh, Luke
AU - Seymour, Ben
AU - Goecke, Roland
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
2023 Fernandez Rojas, Hirachan, Brown, Waddington, Murtagh, Seymour and Goecke.
PY - 2023/6/19
Y1 - 2023/6/19
N2 - Pain assessment is a challenging task encountered by clinicians. In clinical settings, patients’ self-report is considered the gold standard in pain assessment. However, patients who are unable to self-report pain are at a higher risk of undiagnosed pain. In the present study, we explore the use of multiple sensing technologies to monitor physiological changes that can be used as a proxy for objective measurement of acute pain. Electrodermal activity (EDA), photoplethysmography (PPG), and respiration (RESP) signals were collected from 22 participants under two pain intensities (low and high) and on two different anatomical locations (forearm and hand). Three machine learning models were implemented, including support vector machines (SVM), decision trees (DT), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) for the identification of pain. Various pain scenarios were investigated, identification of pain (no pain, pain), multiclass (no pain, low pain, high pain), and identification of pain location (forearm, hand). Reference classification results from individual sensors and from all sensors together were obtained. After feature selection, results showed that EDA was the most informative sensor in the three pain conditions, 93.2±8% in identification of pain, 68.9±10% in the multiclass problem, and 56.0±8% for the identification of pain location. These results identify EDA as the superior sensor in our experimental conditions. Future work is required to validate the obtained features to improve its feasibility in more realistic scenarios. Finally, this study proposes EDA as a candidate to design a tool that can assist clinicians in the assessment of acute pain of nonverbal patients.
AB - Pain assessment is a challenging task encountered by clinicians. In clinical settings, patients’ self-report is considered the gold standard in pain assessment. However, patients who are unable to self-report pain are at a higher risk of undiagnosed pain. In the present study, we explore the use of multiple sensing technologies to monitor physiological changes that can be used as a proxy for objective measurement of acute pain. Electrodermal activity (EDA), photoplethysmography (PPG), and respiration (RESP) signals were collected from 22 participants under two pain intensities (low and high) and on two different anatomical locations (forearm and hand). Three machine learning models were implemented, including support vector machines (SVM), decision trees (DT), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) for the identification of pain. Various pain scenarios were investigated, identification of pain (no pain, pain), multiclass (no pain, low pain, high pain), and identification of pain location (forearm, hand). Reference classification results from individual sensors and from all sensors together were obtained. After feature selection, results showed that EDA was the most informative sensor in the three pain conditions, 93.2±8% in identification of pain, 68.9±10% in the multiclass problem, and 56.0±8% for the identification of pain location. These results identify EDA as the superior sensor in our experimental conditions. Future work is required to validate the obtained features to improve its feasibility in more realistic scenarios. Finally, this study proposes EDA as a candidate to design a tool that can assist clinicians in the assessment of acute pain of nonverbal patients.
KW - Pain
KW - Data fusion
KW - Physiology
KW - Machine Learning
KW - non-verbal communication
KW - Electrodermal Activity
KW - data fusion
KW - EDA
KW - physiology
KW - machine learning
KW - non-verbal
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165237700&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fpain.2023.1150264
DO - 10.3389/fpain.2023.1150264
M3 - Article
SN - 2673-561X
VL - 4
SP - 1
EP - 11
JO - Frontiers in Pain Research
JF - Frontiers in Pain Research
IS - 2023
M1 - 1150264
ER -