Abstract
Under the recently adopted Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, 196 Parties committed to reporting the status of genetic diversity for all species. To facilitate reporting, three genetic diversity indicators were developed, two of which focus on processes contributing to genetic diversity conservation: maintaining genetically distinct populations and ensuring populations are large enough to maintain genetic diversity. The major advantage of these indicators is that they can be estimated with or without DNA-based data. However, demonstrating their feasibility requires addressing the methodological challenges of using data gathered from diverse sources, across diverse taxonomic groups, and for countries of varying socio-economic status and biodiversity levels. Here, we assess the genetic indicators for 919 taxa, representing 5271 populations across nine countries, including megadiverse countries and developing economies. Eighty-three percent of the taxa assessed had data available to calculate at least one indicator. Our results show that although the majority of species maintain most populations, 58% of species have populations too small to maintain genetic diversity. Moreover, genetic indicator values suggest that IUCN Red List status and other initiatives fail to assess genetic status, highlighting the critical importance of genetic indicators.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e14461 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-19 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Ecology Letters |
Volume | 27 |
Issue number | 7 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2024 |
Externally published | Yes |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
In: Ecology Letters, Vol. 27, No. 7, e14461, 07.2024, p. 1-19.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Multinational evaluation of genetic diversity indicators for the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework
AU - Mastretta-Yanes, Alicia
AU - da Silva, Jessica M.
AU - Grueber, Catherine E.
AU - Castillo-Reina, Luis
AU - Köppä, Viktoria
AU - Forester, Brenna R.
AU - Funk, W. Chris
AU - Heuertz, Myriam
AU - Ishihama, Fumiko
AU - Jordan, Rebecca
AU - Mergeay, Joachim
AU - Paz-Vinas, Ivan
AU - Rincon-Parra, Victor Julio
AU - Rodriguez-Morales, Maria Alejandra
AU - Arredondo-Amezcua, Libertad
AU - Brahy, Gaëlle
AU - DeSaix, Matt
AU - Durkee, Lily
AU - Hamilton, Ashley
AU - Hunter, Margaret E.
AU - Koontz, Austin
AU - Lang, Iris
AU - Latorre-Cárdenas, María Camila
AU - Latty, Tanya
AU - Llanes-Quevedo, Alexander
AU - MacDonald, Anna J.
AU - Mahoney, Meg
AU - Miller, Caitlin
AU - Ornelas, Juan Francisco
AU - Ramírez-Barahona, Santiago
AU - Robertson, Erica
AU - Russo, Isa Rita M.
AU - Santiago, Metztli Arcila
AU - Shaw, Robyn E.
AU - Shea, Glenn M.
AU - Sjögren-Gulve, Per
AU - Spence, Emma Suzuki
AU - Stack, Taylor
AU - Suárez, Sofía
AU - Takenaka, Akio
AU - Thurfjell, Henrik
AU - Turbek, Sheela
AU - van der Merwe, Marlien
AU - Visser, Fleur
AU - Wegier, Ana
AU - Wood, Georgina
AU - Zarza, Eugenia
AU - Laikre, Linda
AU - Hoban, Sean
N1 - Funding Information: We dedicate this paper to Michael W. Bruford's invaluable contributions to biodiversity conservation. IP-V. was supported by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Powell Center for Synthesis and Analysis. CEG was supported by a University of Sydney Robinson Fellowship. LL, VK and HT were supported by the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, LL and VK were also supported by Swedish Research Council's VR and Formas grants (2019-05502 and FR-2020/0008) to LL. JFO was supported by grants (61710, 155686, A1-S-26134) from the Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnolog\u00EDas (CONAHCyT). MH was supported by a grant from Investissement d'Avenir grants of the ANR (CEBA:ANR-10-LABX-25-01). We are extremely thankful to the following colleagues, students and local experts who helped conduct the assessments or provided information: Adolfo Gerardo Navarro Siguenza, Alejandra Barrios Flores, Alex Baranowski, Amy Fordham, Ana Isabel Hern\u00E1ndez Carreta, Ana Rebeca Flores Ramos, Anders Angerbj\u00F6rn, Andrew Turner, Ang\u00E9lica Elizabeth Mart\u00EDnez Bauer, Annamaria Savarino-Drago, Anri van Wyk, Arno Thomaes, Arrie Klopper, Bettina Ekdahl, Brandon Weigand, Carl-Gustav Thulin, Deon de Jager, Diana Rivera-Rodr\u00EDguez, Dirk Maes, Ehsan Khedive, Emmanuel Texon S\u00E1nchez, Ernst Baard, Favian Flores Medina, Geert De Knijf, Guillermo Ibarra N\u00FA\u00F1ez, Heather Wood, Ian Little, Ian Rushworth, Jacob H\u00F6glund, Jeroen Speybroeck, Johan Abenius, Johan Ekl\u00F6f, Johanna Kammonen, Jos\u00E9 Carlos Moreno Ju\u00E1rez, Jos\u00E9 de Jes\u00FAs S\u00E1nchez, Karin Nor\u00E9n, Keiichi Fukaya, Krystal Tolley, Marika Stenberg, Masivuye Bulube, Megan Pierson, Melissa Rios, Naoki Tani, Orlando Jael Espinosa Ch\u00E1vez, Paulette Bloomer, Per Nystr\u00F6m, Rob Tolcher, Robert Ekblom, Rossana Amaro, Rowan Masterson, Roxana Abigail Flores Romero, Sam Provoost, Samantha Mynhardt, Sandi Willlows-Munro, Sebastian Sundberg, Socorro Gonz\u00E1lez Elizondo, Sof\u00EDa Villarreal Ponce, Stefan Palm, Nils Ryman, Vania Jim\u00E9nez Lobato, Victor Leohr and Grupo de Monitoreo Biol\u00F3gico Milpa Alta. We are thankful to Francisca Acevedo and Irene Ramos, whose contributions to SiAgroBD-CONABIO inspired the participatory approach of this work. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Funding Information: We dedicate this paper to Michael W. Bruford's invaluable contributions to biodiversity conservation. IP\u2010V. was supported by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Powell Center for Synthesis and Analysis. CEG was supported by a University of Sydney Robinson Fellowship. LL, VK and HT were supported by the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, LL and VK were also supported by Swedish Research Council's VR and Formas grants (2019\u201005502 and FR\u20102020/0008) to LL. JFO was supported by grants (61710, 155686, A1\u2010S\u201026134) from the Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnolog\u00EDas (CONAHCyT). MH was supported by a grant from Investissement d'Avenir grants of the ANR (CEBA:ANR\u201010\u2010LABX\u201025\u201001). We are extremely thankful to the following colleagues, students and local experts who helped conduct the assessments or provided information: Adolfo Gerardo Navarro Siguenza, Alejandra Barrios Flores, Alex Baranowski, Amy Fordham, Ana Isabel Hern\u00E1ndez Carreta, Ana Rebeca Flores Ramos, Anders Angerbj\u00F6rn, Andrew Turner, Ang\u00E9lica Elizabeth Mart\u00EDnez Bauer, Annamaria Savarino\u2010Drago, Anri van Wyk, Arno Thomaes, Arrie Klopper, Bettina Ekdahl, Brandon Weigand, Carl\u2010Gustav Thulin, Deon de Jager, Diana Rivera\u2010Rodr\u00EDguez, Dirk Maes, Ehsan Khedive, Emmanuel Texon S\u00E1nchez, Ernst Baard, Favian Flores Medina, Geert De Knijf, Guillermo Ibarra N\u00FA\u00F1ez, Heather Wood, Ian Little, Ian Rushworth, Jacob H\u00F6glund, Jeroen Speybroeck, Johan Abenius, Johan Ekl\u00F6f, Johanna Kammonen, Jos\u00E9 Carlos Moreno Ju\u00E1rez, Jos\u00E9 de Jes\u00FAs S\u00E1nchez, Karin Nor\u00E9n, Keiichi Fukaya, Krystal Tolley, Marika Stenberg, Masivuye Bulube, Megan Pierson, Melissa Rios, Naoki Tani, Orlando Jael Espinosa Ch\u00E1vez, Paulette Bloomer, Per Nystr\u00F6m, Rob Tolcher, Robert Ekblom, Rossana Amaro, Rowan Masterson, Roxana Abigail Flores Romero, Sam Provoost, Samantha Mynhardt, Sandi Willlows\u2010Munro, Sebastian Sundberg, Socorro Gonz\u00E1lez Elizondo, Sof\u00EDa Villarreal Ponce, Stefan Palm, Nils Ryman, Vania Jim\u00E9nez Lobato, Victor Leohr and Grupo de Monitoreo Biol\u00F3gico Milpa Alta. We are thankful to Francisca Acevedo and Irene Ramos, whose contributions to SiAgroBD\u2010CONABIO inspired the participatory approach of this work. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Ecology Letters published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - Under the recently adopted Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, 196 Parties committed to reporting the status of genetic diversity for all species. To facilitate reporting, three genetic diversity indicators were developed, two of which focus on processes contributing to genetic diversity conservation: maintaining genetically distinct populations and ensuring populations are large enough to maintain genetic diversity. The major advantage of these indicators is that they can be estimated with or without DNA-based data. However, demonstrating their feasibility requires addressing the methodological challenges of using data gathered from diverse sources, across diverse taxonomic groups, and for countries of varying socio-economic status and biodiversity levels. Here, we assess the genetic indicators for 919 taxa, representing 5271 populations across nine countries, including megadiverse countries and developing economies. Eighty-three percent of the taxa assessed had data available to calculate at least one indicator. Our results show that although the majority of species maintain most populations, 58% of species have populations too small to maintain genetic diversity. Moreover, genetic indicator values suggest that IUCN Red List status and other initiatives fail to assess genetic status, highlighting the critical importance of genetic indicators.
AB - Under the recently adopted Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, 196 Parties committed to reporting the status of genetic diversity for all species. To facilitate reporting, three genetic diversity indicators were developed, two of which focus on processes contributing to genetic diversity conservation: maintaining genetically distinct populations and ensuring populations are large enough to maintain genetic diversity. The major advantage of these indicators is that they can be estimated with or without DNA-based data. However, demonstrating their feasibility requires addressing the methodological challenges of using data gathered from diverse sources, across diverse taxonomic groups, and for countries of varying socio-economic status and biodiversity levels. Here, we assess the genetic indicators for 919 taxa, representing 5271 populations across nine countries, including megadiverse countries and developing economies. Eighty-three percent of the taxa assessed had data available to calculate at least one indicator. Our results show that although the majority of species maintain most populations, 58% of species have populations too small to maintain genetic diversity. Moreover, genetic indicator values suggest that IUCN Red List status and other initiatives fail to assess genetic status, highlighting the critical importance of genetic indicators.
KW - biodiversity indicators
KW - Convention on Biological Diversity
KW - COP15
KW - effective population size
KW - populations maintained
KW - Red List
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85197316438&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ele.14461
DO - 10.1111/ele.14461
M3 - Article
C2 - 38953253
AN - SCOPUS:85197316438
SN - 1461-023X
VL - 27
SP - 1
EP - 19
JO - Ecology Letters
JF - Ecology Letters
IS - 7
M1 - e14461
ER -