Multiple interpretations of the rokeach value survey

Keith Gibbins, Iain Walker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is suggested that the popularity of the Rokeach Value Survey is undeserved and that the apparent independence of each value being measured is a consequence of the fact that the survey measures each value quite badly. For each of the 18 terminal values on the Rokeach Value Survey, various interpretations were suggested to 71 subjects, who indicated which interpretations represented their thoughts when they were completing the survey. There were a variety of interpretations. When a factor analysis of the correlations among all the interpretations of each value was carried out, all but one value had more than one significant factor (dimension of meaning), and two major factors accounted for 41% of the variance of all the interpretations. These results indicate that the Rokeach Value Survey is not a good measure of the relative desirability of different values, and they support the view that people's evaluations of the world may be based on more fundamental values.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)797-805
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Social Psychology
Volume133
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Statistical Factor Analysis
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

@article{4cef2a444b484f989030951c8121c772,
title = "Multiple interpretations of the rokeach value survey",
abstract = "It is suggested that the popularity of the Rokeach Value Survey is undeserved and that the apparent independence of each value being measured is a consequence of the fact that the survey measures each value quite badly. For each of the 18 terminal values on the Rokeach Value Survey, various interpretations were suggested to 71 subjects, who indicated which interpretations represented their thoughts when they were completing the survey. There were a variety of interpretations. When a factor analysis of the correlations among all the interpretations of each value was carried out, all but one value had more than one significant factor (dimension of meaning), and two major factors accounted for 41{\%} of the variance of all the interpretations. These results indicate that the Rokeach Value Survey is not a good measure of the relative desirability of different values, and they support the view that people's evaluations of the world may be based on more fundamental values.",
author = "Keith Gibbins and Iain Walker",
year = "1993",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00224545.1993.9713941",
language = "English",
volume = "133",
pages = "797--805",
journal = "Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-4545",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

Multiple interpretations of the rokeach value survey. / Gibbins, Keith; Walker, Iain.

In: Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 133, No. 6, 01.01.1993, p. 797-805.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multiple interpretations of the rokeach value survey

AU - Gibbins, Keith

AU - Walker, Iain

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

N2 - It is suggested that the popularity of the Rokeach Value Survey is undeserved and that the apparent independence of each value being measured is a consequence of the fact that the survey measures each value quite badly. For each of the 18 terminal values on the Rokeach Value Survey, various interpretations were suggested to 71 subjects, who indicated which interpretations represented their thoughts when they were completing the survey. There were a variety of interpretations. When a factor analysis of the correlations among all the interpretations of each value was carried out, all but one value had more than one significant factor (dimension of meaning), and two major factors accounted for 41% of the variance of all the interpretations. These results indicate that the Rokeach Value Survey is not a good measure of the relative desirability of different values, and they support the view that people's evaluations of the world may be based on more fundamental values.

AB - It is suggested that the popularity of the Rokeach Value Survey is undeserved and that the apparent independence of each value being measured is a consequence of the fact that the survey measures each value quite badly. For each of the 18 terminal values on the Rokeach Value Survey, various interpretations were suggested to 71 subjects, who indicated which interpretations represented their thoughts when they were completing the survey. There were a variety of interpretations. When a factor analysis of the correlations among all the interpretations of each value was carried out, all but one value had more than one significant factor (dimension of meaning), and two major factors accounted for 41% of the variance of all the interpretations. These results indicate that the Rokeach Value Survey is not a good measure of the relative desirability of different values, and they support the view that people's evaluations of the world may be based on more fundamental values.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21344489974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00224545.1993.9713941

DO - 10.1080/00224545.1993.9713941

M3 - Article

VL - 133

SP - 797

EP - 805

JO - Journal of Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0022-4545

IS - 6

ER -