Muslims and the Mainstream in Australia: Polarisation or Engagement?

John Dryzek, Bora Kanra

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Most studies of relationships encompassing Muslim minorities and Western societies examine Muslim and non-Muslim orientations separately. Here we investigate the patterns of similarity and difference involving Muslims and non-Muslims in Australia in terms of how they conceptualise the situation of Muslims in a secular society. We deploy Q methodology to study selected Muslims and non-Muslims in the same terms. Our results reveal three substantial positions. The first, ‘Assertive Islamic Belonging’, is mostly (but not exclusively) found among our Muslim subjects. The second, ‘Exasperated Monoculturalism’, is mostly (again not exclusively) associated with non-Muslims. The third, ‘Reciprocal Engagement’, has considerable presence in both sorts of communities. These results shed new light on the content of polarisation stressed in previous studies. They can also be deployed in the interests of productive dialogue across undeniable difference. The ‘Reciprocal Engagement’ position can act as a kind of discursive bridge, and the content of the two more polarised positions shows neither is beyond the reach of dialogue. We explore implications for dialogue across difference in a democracy and show how our findings can inform a deliberative democratic approach to multiculturalism.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1236-1253
    Number of pages18
    JournalJournal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
    Volume40
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    polarization
    Muslim
    dialogue
    multicultural society
    Muslims
    Polarization
    minority
    democracy
    methodology
    society
    community

    Cite this

    @article{85bc881a59964f8d9069004a778f154f,
    title = "Muslims and the Mainstream in Australia: Polarisation or Engagement?",
    abstract = "Most studies of relationships encompassing Muslim minorities and Western societies examine Muslim and non-Muslim orientations separately. Here we investigate the patterns of similarity and difference involving Muslims and non-Muslims in Australia in terms of how they conceptualise the situation of Muslims in a secular society. We deploy Q methodology to study selected Muslims and non-Muslims in the same terms. Our results reveal three substantial positions. The first, ‘Assertive Islamic Belonging’, is mostly (but not exclusively) found among our Muslim subjects. The second, ‘Exasperated Monoculturalism’, is mostly (again not exclusively) associated with non-Muslims. The third, ‘Reciprocal Engagement’, has considerable presence in both sorts of communities. These results shed new light on the content of polarisation stressed in previous studies. They can also be deployed in the interests of productive dialogue across undeniable difference. The ‘Reciprocal Engagement’ position can act as a kind of discursive bridge, and the content of the two more polarised positions shows neither is beyond the reach of dialogue. We explore implications for dialogue across difference in a democracy and show how our findings can inform a deliberative democratic approach to multiculturalism.",
    keywords = "Muslims, Australia, Deliberation, Multiculturalism, Q Methodology",
    author = "John Dryzek and Bora Kanra",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1080/1369183X.2013.849568",
    language = "English",
    volume = "40",
    pages = "1236--1253",
    journal = "New Community",
    issn = "0047-9586",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "8",

    }

    Muslims and the Mainstream in Australia: Polarisation or Engagement? / Dryzek, John; Kanra, Bora.

    In: Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Vol. 40, No. 8, 2014, p. 1236-1253.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Muslims and the Mainstream in Australia: Polarisation or Engagement?

    AU - Dryzek, John

    AU - Kanra, Bora

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Most studies of relationships encompassing Muslim minorities and Western societies examine Muslim and non-Muslim orientations separately. Here we investigate the patterns of similarity and difference involving Muslims and non-Muslims in Australia in terms of how they conceptualise the situation of Muslims in a secular society. We deploy Q methodology to study selected Muslims and non-Muslims in the same terms. Our results reveal three substantial positions. The first, ‘Assertive Islamic Belonging’, is mostly (but not exclusively) found among our Muslim subjects. The second, ‘Exasperated Monoculturalism’, is mostly (again not exclusively) associated with non-Muslims. The third, ‘Reciprocal Engagement’, has considerable presence in both sorts of communities. These results shed new light on the content of polarisation stressed in previous studies. They can also be deployed in the interests of productive dialogue across undeniable difference. The ‘Reciprocal Engagement’ position can act as a kind of discursive bridge, and the content of the two more polarised positions shows neither is beyond the reach of dialogue. We explore implications for dialogue across difference in a democracy and show how our findings can inform a deliberative democratic approach to multiculturalism.

    AB - Most studies of relationships encompassing Muslim minorities and Western societies examine Muslim and non-Muslim orientations separately. Here we investigate the patterns of similarity and difference involving Muslims and non-Muslims in Australia in terms of how they conceptualise the situation of Muslims in a secular society. We deploy Q methodology to study selected Muslims and non-Muslims in the same terms. Our results reveal three substantial positions. The first, ‘Assertive Islamic Belonging’, is mostly (but not exclusively) found among our Muslim subjects. The second, ‘Exasperated Monoculturalism’, is mostly (again not exclusively) associated with non-Muslims. The third, ‘Reciprocal Engagement’, has considerable presence in both sorts of communities. These results shed new light on the content of polarisation stressed in previous studies. They can also be deployed in the interests of productive dialogue across undeniable difference. The ‘Reciprocal Engagement’ position can act as a kind of discursive bridge, and the content of the two more polarised positions shows neither is beyond the reach of dialogue. We explore implications for dialogue across difference in a democracy and show how our findings can inform a deliberative democratic approach to multiculturalism.

    KW - Muslims

    KW - Australia

    KW - Deliberation

    KW - Multiculturalism

    KW - Q Methodology

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901369024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/muslims-mainstream-australia-polarisation-engagement

    U2 - 10.1080/1369183X.2013.849568

    DO - 10.1080/1369183X.2013.849568

    M3 - Article

    VL - 40

    SP - 1236

    EP - 1253

    JO - New Community

    JF - New Community

    SN - 0047-9586

    IS - 8

    ER -