Myths of the future and scenario archetypes

Fabio Boschetti, Jennifer Price, Iain WALKER

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We employ tools from the social cognition and cultural theory literatures to explore images, concerns, expectations, and attitudes towards the future among the general public. An online survey of 950 Australian citizens was conducted to identify five distinct views of the future. These myths of the future are ‘social crisis’, ‘eco-crisis’, ‘techno-optimism’, ‘power and economic inequality’, and ‘social transformation’. We discuss how these myths relate to the scenario archetypes as commonly employed in foresight literature. This analysis reveals how psychological and cognitive considerations may contribute to the literature and could be incorporated in the running of foresight exercises. Among the 5 myths, techno-optimism describes beliefs that science and technology are likely to create innovations that can improve our quality of life. It provides a firm anchor between scenario archetypes, myths of the future, and the STEEP (social, technological, economic, environmental, and political) framework, by holding a similar meaning in all three settings. Our analysis also elucidates how attitudes towards technological development are not value-free and are influenced by beliefs regarding how society and the environment should be managed, and to what extent technology itself can be a positive or negative force in this management
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)76-85
Number of pages10
JournalTechnological Forecasting and Social Change
Volume111
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Economics
Technology
Anchors
Cognition
Innovation
Quality of Life
Psychology
Optimism
Archetypes
Scenarios
Power (Psychology)
Surveys and Questionnaires
Foresight

Cite this

Boschetti, Fabio ; Price, Jennifer ; WALKER, Iain. / Myths of the future and scenario archetypes. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2016 ; Vol. 111. pp. 76-85.
@article{1f961dc25b274458a4739cb6652ef3d9,
title = "Myths of the future and scenario archetypes",
abstract = "We employ tools from the social cognition and cultural theory literatures to explore images, concerns, expectations, and attitudes towards the future among the general public. An online survey of 950 Australian citizens was conducted to identify five distinct views of the future. These myths of the future are ‘social crisis’, ‘eco-crisis’, ‘techno-optimism’, ‘power and economic inequality’, and ‘social transformation’. We discuss how these myths relate to the scenario archetypes as commonly employed in foresight literature. This analysis reveals how psychological and cognitive considerations may contribute to the literature and could be incorporated in the running of foresight exercises. Among the 5 myths, techno-optimism describes beliefs that science and technology are likely to create innovations that can improve our quality of life. It provides a firm anchor between scenario archetypes, myths of the future, and the STEEP (social, technological, economic, environmental, and political) framework, by holding a similar meaning in all three settings. Our analysis also elucidates how attitudes towards technological development are not value-free and are influenced by beliefs regarding how society and the environment should be managed, and to what extent technology itself can be a positive or negative force in this management",
author = "Fabio Boschetti and Jennifer Price and Iain WALKER",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.009",
language = "English",
volume = "111",
pages = "76--85",
journal = "Technological Forecasting",
issn = "0040-1625",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

Myths of the future and scenario archetypes. / Boschetti, Fabio; Price, Jennifer; WALKER, Iain.

In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 111, 2016, p. 76-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Myths of the future and scenario archetypes

AU - Boschetti, Fabio

AU - Price, Jennifer

AU - WALKER, Iain

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - We employ tools from the social cognition and cultural theory literatures to explore images, concerns, expectations, and attitudes towards the future among the general public. An online survey of 950 Australian citizens was conducted to identify five distinct views of the future. These myths of the future are ‘social crisis’, ‘eco-crisis’, ‘techno-optimism’, ‘power and economic inequality’, and ‘social transformation’. We discuss how these myths relate to the scenario archetypes as commonly employed in foresight literature. This analysis reveals how psychological and cognitive considerations may contribute to the literature and could be incorporated in the running of foresight exercises. Among the 5 myths, techno-optimism describes beliefs that science and technology are likely to create innovations that can improve our quality of life. It provides a firm anchor between scenario archetypes, myths of the future, and the STEEP (social, technological, economic, environmental, and political) framework, by holding a similar meaning in all three settings. Our analysis also elucidates how attitudes towards technological development are not value-free and are influenced by beliefs regarding how society and the environment should be managed, and to what extent technology itself can be a positive or negative force in this management

AB - We employ tools from the social cognition and cultural theory literatures to explore images, concerns, expectations, and attitudes towards the future among the general public. An online survey of 950 Australian citizens was conducted to identify five distinct views of the future. These myths of the future are ‘social crisis’, ‘eco-crisis’, ‘techno-optimism’, ‘power and economic inequality’, and ‘social transformation’. We discuss how these myths relate to the scenario archetypes as commonly employed in foresight literature. This analysis reveals how psychological and cognitive considerations may contribute to the literature and could be incorporated in the running of foresight exercises. Among the 5 myths, techno-optimism describes beliefs that science and technology are likely to create innovations that can improve our quality of life. It provides a firm anchor between scenario archetypes, myths of the future, and the STEEP (social, technological, economic, environmental, and political) framework, by holding a similar meaning in all three settings. Our analysis also elucidates how attitudes towards technological development are not value-free and are influenced by beliefs regarding how society and the environment should be managed, and to what extent technology itself can be a positive or negative force in this management

U2 - 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.009

DO - 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.009

M3 - Article

VL - 111

SP - 76

EP - 85

JO - Technological Forecasting

JF - Technological Forecasting

SN - 0040-1625

ER -