National Security versus Civil Liberties

Towards an Australian Bill of Rights

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

Abstract

Issues of border security were already at the forefront of the political agenda (Brennan 2003) when the events of September 11 and the Bali bombings shocked the Australian political landscape. Amidst this climate of fear, legislation was rushed1 through Parliament to combat the ‘terrorists’. The resulting terror laws, which include new state powers to detain citizens not accused of crimes and the reversal of the burden of proof on the state,2 have been dubbed “some of the most draconian ‘counter-terrorism’ measures in the western world” (Hocking 2004; also Evans 2003). Unfortunately, the frantic rush to pass legislation to protect the state may have evoked Sir Thomas More’s (Roper 1967:147) fear that in ‘cutting down’ the rule of law to ‘get after the devil’, citizens have ‘nowhere to hide’ from the abuse of state power.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAustralasian Political Studies Association Conference, University of Adelaide
Subtitle of host publicationAPSA 2004
Place of PublicationAustralia
PublisherRoutledge
Pages1-25
Number of pages25
Publication statusPublished - 29 Sep 2004
EventAustralasian Political Studies Association - Adelaide, Australia
Duration: 29 Sep 20041 Oct 2004

Publication series

NameAustralian Journal of Political Science
PublisherRoutledge
ISSN (Print)1036-1146

Conference

ConferenceAustralasian Political Studies Association
CountryAustralia
CityAdelaide
Period29/09/041/10/04

Fingerprint

national security
bill
terrorism
legislation
anxiety
citizen
political agenda
accused
Western world
constitutional state
parliament
abuse
offense
climate
Law
event

Cite this

De Percy, M. (2004). National Security versus Civil Liberties: Towards an Australian Bill of Rights. In Australasian Political Studies Association Conference, University of Adelaide: APSA 2004 (pp. 1-25). (Australian Journal of Political Science). Australia: Routledge.
De Percy, Michael. / National Security versus Civil Liberties : Towards an Australian Bill of Rights. Australasian Political Studies Association Conference, University of Adelaide: APSA 2004. Australia : Routledge, 2004. pp. 1-25 (Australian Journal of Political Science).
@inproceedings{5e52b8fe50674493a409ff6c1874c00c,
title = "National Security versus Civil Liberties: Towards an Australian Bill of Rights",
abstract = "Issues of border security were already at the forefront of the political agenda (Brennan 2003) when the events of September 11 and the Bali bombings shocked the Australian political landscape. Amidst this climate of fear, legislation was rushed1 through Parliament to combat the ‘terrorists’. The resulting terror laws, which include new state powers to detain citizens not accused of crimes and the reversal of the burden of proof on the state,2 have been dubbed “some of the most draconian ‘counter-terrorism’ measures in the western world” (Hocking 2004; also Evans 2003). Unfortunately, the frantic rush to pass legislation to protect the state may have evoked Sir Thomas More’s (Roper 1967:147) fear that in ‘cutting down’ the rule of law to ‘get after the devil’, citizens have ‘nowhere to hide’ from the abuse of state power.",
author = "{De Percy}, Michael",
year = "2004",
month = "9",
day = "29",
language = "English",
series = "Australian Journal of Political Science",
publisher = "Routledge",
pages = "1--25",
booktitle = "Australasian Political Studies Association Conference, University of Adelaide",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

De Percy, M 2004, National Security versus Civil Liberties: Towards an Australian Bill of Rights. in Australasian Political Studies Association Conference, University of Adelaide: APSA 2004. Australian Journal of Political Science, Routledge, Australia, pp. 1-25, Australasian Political Studies Association, Adelaide, Australia, 29/09/04.

National Security versus Civil Liberties : Towards an Australian Bill of Rights. / De Percy, Michael.

Australasian Political Studies Association Conference, University of Adelaide: APSA 2004. Australia : Routledge, 2004. p. 1-25 (Australian Journal of Political Science).

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - National Security versus Civil Liberties

T2 - Towards an Australian Bill of Rights

AU - De Percy, Michael

PY - 2004/9/29

Y1 - 2004/9/29

N2 - Issues of border security were already at the forefront of the political agenda (Brennan 2003) when the events of September 11 and the Bali bombings shocked the Australian political landscape. Amidst this climate of fear, legislation was rushed1 through Parliament to combat the ‘terrorists’. The resulting terror laws, which include new state powers to detain citizens not accused of crimes and the reversal of the burden of proof on the state,2 have been dubbed “some of the most draconian ‘counter-terrorism’ measures in the western world” (Hocking 2004; also Evans 2003). Unfortunately, the frantic rush to pass legislation to protect the state may have evoked Sir Thomas More’s (Roper 1967:147) fear that in ‘cutting down’ the rule of law to ‘get after the devil’, citizens have ‘nowhere to hide’ from the abuse of state power.

AB - Issues of border security were already at the forefront of the political agenda (Brennan 2003) when the events of September 11 and the Bali bombings shocked the Australian political landscape. Amidst this climate of fear, legislation was rushed1 through Parliament to combat the ‘terrorists’. The resulting terror laws, which include new state powers to detain citizens not accused of crimes and the reversal of the burden of proof on the state,2 have been dubbed “some of the most draconian ‘counter-terrorism’ measures in the western world” (Hocking 2004; also Evans 2003). Unfortunately, the frantic rush to pass legislation to protect the state may have evoked Sir Thomas More’s (Roper 1967:147) fear that in ‘cutting down’ the rule of law to ‘get after the devil’, citizens have ‘nowhere to hide’ from the abuse of state power.

M3 - Conference contribution

T3 - Australian Journal of Political Science

SP - 1

EP - 25

BT - Australasian Political Studies Association Conference, University of Adelaide

PB - Routledge

CY - Australia

ER -

De Percy M. National Security versus Civil Liberties: Towards an Australian Bill of Rights. In Australasian Political Studies Association Conference, University of Adelaide: APSA 2004. Australia: Routledge. 2004. p. 1-25. (Australian Journal of Political Science).