Abstract
A sense of psychological connectedness with the natural world has important benefits for global health. In a time of environmental crisis, however, it may also be accompanied by mental health risks. We used national survey data collected after a severe Australian bushfire season (N = 3,875) to test a path model of the relationships between nature connectedness, worry about climate change, individual and collective climate action, and psychological distress (depression, anxiety, stress). We found that nature connectedness was positively associated with climate worry that, in turn, was positively associated with climate action and psychological distress. Whereas taking individual climate action was associated with reduced psychological distress, taking collective climate action had the opposite effect. Our findings provide new insights into potential processes underlying the association between nature connectedness and mental health in the climate change context and point to an urgent need to protect the well-being of people engaging in collective climate action
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 448-460 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Translational Issues in Psychological Science |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 12 May 2022 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Nature Connectedness in the Climate Change Context: Implications for Climate Action and Mental Health'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver