Abstract
This article seeks to situate the current political polity of post-reformasi Indonesia by arguing against reform optimists and reform skeptics. It argues that necessity had given rise to widespread reforms within Indonesia. However, as a “politics-as-usual” atmosphere re-dominated the political landscape, the pace of reform was not as qualitatively comprehensive, its scope and variety decreased. Nonetheless, earlier necessity-driven reforms had set in place the bulwark of immutable change within Indonesia’s political landscape that makes recentralization, or rather a reversion to New Order authoritarianism quite impractical.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 9-26 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Revista UNISCI |
| Volume | 2019 |
| Issue number | 50 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 May 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Necessity as a Force for Change: Refuting Reform Optimists and Reform Skeptics of Contemporary Indonesia: Contradecir a los optimistas de la reforma y a los escépticos reformistas de la Indonesia contemporánea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver