Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
University of Canberra Research Portal Home
Search content at University of Canberra Research Portal
Home
Profiles
Research output
Projects
Press/MediaIO
Activities
Research units
Prizes
Student theses
Impacts
Neighborhood Walkability and the Walking Behavior of Australian Adults
Neville Owen
, Ester Cerin
, Eva Leslie
, Lorinne duToit
, Neil Coffee
, Lawrence D. Frank
, Adrian E. Bauman
, Graeme Hugo
, Brian E. Saelens
, James F. Sallis
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
532
Link opens in a new tab
Citations (Scopus)
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Neighborhood Walkability and the Walking Behavior of Australian Adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Australian Adults
100%
Neighborhood Walkability
100%
Walking for Transport
100%
Walking Behavior
100%
Walkability
60%
Walking for Recreation
60%
Walkability Index
40%
Neighborhood Self-selection
40%
Australia
20%
Geographic Information System
20%
Socioeconomic Status
20%
Physical Activity
20%
Environmental Factors
20%
Physical Environment
20%
Policy Initiatives
20%
Australian Cities
20%
Physical Attributes
20%
Friendly Environment
20%
System Database
20%
Public Health Advocacy
20%
Residential Neighborhood
20%
Area-level Socioeconomic Status
20%
Walkable Neighborhood
20%
Environmental Initiatives
20%
Validated Survey
20%
Transport Walking
20%
Weekly Frequency
20%
Neighborhood Physical Environment
20%
Total Variation
20%
Social Sciences
Connectedness
100%
Natural Environment
100%
Self-Selection
100%
Australia
50%
Environmental Factor
50%
Physical Activity
50%
Advocacy
50%
Geographic Information System
50%
Database Systems
50%
Individual Level
50%
Medicine and Dentistry
Recreation
100%
Socioeconomic Status
66%
Physical Environment
66%
Public Health
33%
Environmental Factor
33%
Physical Activity
33%
Preference
33%
Nursing and Health Professions
Socioeconomic Status
100%
Geographic Information System
50%
Health Advocacy
50%
Physical Activity
50%
Public Health
50%
Psychology
Recreation
100%
Connectedness
66%
Physical Activity
33%
Public Health
33%
Study Design
33%
Individual Gender
33%