Neighbourhood environmental attributes associated withwalking in south Australian adults: Differences between urban and rural areas

Narelle M. Berry, Neil T. Coffee, Rebecca Nolan, James Dollman, Takemi Sugiyama

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    14 Citations (Scopus)
    43 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Although the health benefits of walking are well established, participation is lower in rural areas compared to urban areas. Most studies on walkability and walking have been conducted in urban areas, thus little is known about the relevance of walkability to rural areas. A computer-assisted telephone survey of 2402 adults (aged ≥18 years) was conducted to determine walking behaviour and perceptions of neighbourhood walkability. Data were stratified by urban (n = 1738) and rural (n = 664). A greater proportion of respondents reported no walking in rural (25.8%) compared to urban areas (18.5%). Compared to urban areas, rural areas had lower walkability scores and urban residents reported higher frequency of walking. The association of perceived walkability with walking was significant only in urban areas. These results suggest that environmental factors associated with walking in urban areas may not be relevant in rural areas. Appropriate walkability measures specific to rural areas should be further researched.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number965
    Pages (from-to)1-8
    Number of pages8
    JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
    Volume14
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Neighbourhood environmental attributes associated withwalking in south Australian adults: Differences between urban and rural areas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this