Neighbourhood socioeconomic and transport disadvantage: The potential to reduce social inequities in health through transport

Jerome N. Rachele, Vincent Learnihan, Hannah M. Badland, Suzanne Mavoa, Gavin Turrell, Billie Giles-Corti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Globally, concerns about population growth, urbanisation, traffic congestion, climate change and rising chronic disease are prompting policy-makers and governments to prioritise policies that support local walking and increase access to public transport. These are of particular relevance for those more likely to experience transport disadvantage, such as those in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas, where transport disadvantage tends to be higher. The aim of this study was to examine associations between neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and transport-related spatial measures, identified through a review of transport-related policies. It included 2460 neighbourhoods in Brisbane, Australia as defined by the 2011 Australian national census boundaries. Neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage was measured using a census-derived composite index. Policy-relevant spatial measures included: street connectivity, cul-de-sac length, street block length, traffic volume, public transport stops and public transport frequency. Data were analysed using binary and multinomial logistic regression. More disadvantaged neighbourhoods had significantly greater odds of being highly connected, and with cul-de-sac and street block lengths, and public transport stop access and frequencies at levels recommended by Australian urban and transport policies, although they also had higher traffic volumes. Compared with more advantaged neighbourhoods, there was no evidence that disadvantaged neighbourhoods in Brisbane experience transport disadvantage. Although these neighbourhoods have higher levels of traffic, they are more likely to comprise urban and transport design features and levels of public transport access recommended by Australian urban and transport policies. The distribution of transport-related infrastructure in Brisbane has potential to reduce health inequities; and could potentially be enhanced further by reducing exposure to traffic.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)256-263
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Transport and Health
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2017

Fingerprint

Health
public transport
health
Vulnerable Populations
Traffic congestion
Climate change
traffic volume
Censuses
Logistics
census
traffic
Composite materials
Urbanization
Climate Change
Population Growth
traffic congestion
Administrative Personnel
population growth
Walking
urbanization

Cite this

Rachele, Jerome N. ; Learnihan, Vincent ; Badland, Hannah M. ; Mavoa, Suzanne ; Turrell, Gavin ; Giles-Corti, Billie. / Neighbourhood socioeconomic and transport disadvantage: The potential to reduce social inequities in health through transport. In: Journal of Transport and Health. 2017 ; Vol. 7. pp. 256-263.
@article{1b2e79579c0d4f3fb2abbd1a7591a6a4,
title = "Neighbourhood socioeconomic and transport disadvantage: The potential to reduce social inequities in health through transport",
abstract = "Globally, concerns about population growth, urbanisation, traffic congestion, climate change and rising chronic disease are prompting policy-makers and governments to prioritise policies that support local walking and increase access to public transport. These are of particular relevance for those more likely to experience transport disadvantage, such as those in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas, where transport disadvantage tends to be higher. The aim of this study was to examine associations between neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and transport-related spatial measures, identified through a review of transport-related policies. It included 2460 neighbourhoods in Brisbane, Australia as defined by the 2011 Australian national census boundaries. Neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage was measured using a census-derived composite index. Policy-relevant spatial measures included: street connectivity, cul-de-sac length, street block length, traffic volume, public transport stops and public transport frequency. Data were analysed using binary and multinomial logistic regression. More disadvantaged neighbourhoods had significantly greater odds of being highly connected, and with cul-de-sac and street block lengths, and public transport stop access and frequencies at levels recommended by Australian urban and transport policies, although they also had higher traffic volumes. Compared with more advantaged neighbourhoods, there was no evidence that disadvantaged neighbourhoods in Brisbane experience transport disadvantage. Although these neighbourhoods have higher levels of traffic, they are more likely to comprise urban and transport design features and levels of public transport access recommended by Australian urban and transport policies. The distribution of transport-related infrastructure in Brisbane has potential to reduce health inequities; and could potentially be enhanced further by reducing exposure to traffic.",
keywords = "Neighbourhood disadvantage, Review, Socioeconomic background, Transport disadvantage, Urban planning, policy",
author = "Rachele, {Jerome N.} and Vincent Learnihan and Badland, {Hannah M.} and Suzanne Mavoa and Gavin Turrell and Billie Giles-Corti",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.jth.2017.09.002",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "256--263",
journal = "Journal of Transport and Health",
issn = "2214-1405",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Neighbourhood socioeconomic and transport disadvantage: The potential to reduce social inequities in health through transport. / Rachele, Jerome N.; Learnihan, Vincent; Badland, Hannah M.; Mavoa, Suzanne; Turrell, Gavin; Giles-Corti, Billie.

In: Journal of Transport and Health, Vol. 7, 12.2017, p. 256-263.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neighbourhood socioeconomic and transport disadvantage: The potential to reduce social inequities in health through transport

AU - Rachele, Jerome N.

AU - Learnihan, Vincent

AU - Badland, Hannah M.

AU - Mavoa, Suzanne

AU - Turrell, Gavin

AU - Giles-Corti, Billie

PY - 2017/12

Y1 - 2017/12

N2 - Globally, concerns about population growth, urbanisation, traffic congestion, climate change and rising chronic disease are prompting policy-makers and governments to prioritise policies that support local walking and increase access to public transport. These are of particular relevance for those more likely to experience transport disadvantage, such as those in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas, where transport disadvantage tends to be higher. The aim of this study was to examine associations between neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and transport-related spatial measures, identified through a review of transport-related policies. It included 2460 neighbourhoods in Brisbane, Australia as defined by the 2011 Australian national census boundaries. Neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage was measured using a census-derived composite index. Policy-relevant spatial measures included: street connectivity, cul-de-sac length, street block length, traffic volume, public transport stops and public transport frequency. Data were analysed using binary and multinomial logistic regression. More disadvantaged neighbourhoods had significantly greater odds of being highly connected, and with cul-de-sac and street block lengths, and public transport stop access and frequencies at levels recommended by Australian urban and transport policies, although they also had higher traffic volumes. Compared with more advantaged neighbourhoods, there was no evidence that disadvantaged neighbourhoods in Brisbane experience transport disadvantage. Although these neighbourhoods have higher levels of traffic, they are more likely to comprise urban and transport design features and levels of public transport access recommended by Australian urban and transport policies. The distribution of transport-related infrastructure in Brisbane has potential to reduce health inequities; and could potentially be enhanced further by reducing exposure to traffic.

AB - Globally, concerns about population growth, urbanisation, traffic congestion, climate change and rising chronic disease are prompting policy-makers and governments to prioritise policies that support local walking and increase access to public transport. These are of particular relevance for those more likely to experience transport disadvantage, such as those in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas, where transport disadvantage tends to be higher. The aim of this study was to examine associations between neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and transport-related spatial measures, identified through a review of transport-related policies. It included 2460 neighbourhoods in Brisbane, Australia as defined by the 2011 Australian national census boundaries. Neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage was measured using a census-derived composite index. Policy-relevant spatial measures included: street connectivity, cul-de-sac length, street block length, traffic volume, public transport stops and public transport frequency. Data were analysed using binary and multinomial logistic regression. More disadvantaged neighbourhoods had significantly greater odds of being highly connected, and with cul-de-sac and street block lengths, and public transport stop access and frequencies at levels recommended by Australian urban and transport policies, although they also had higher traffic volumes. Compared with more advantaged neighbourhoods, there was no evidence that disadvantaged neighbourhoods in Brisbane experience transport disadvantage. Although these neighbourhoods have higher levels of traffic, they are more likely to comprise urban and transport design features and levels of public transport access recommended by Australian urban and transport policies. The distribution of transport-related infrastructure in Brisbane has potential to reduce health inequities; and could potentially be enhanced further by reducing exposure to traffic.

KW - Neighbourhood disadvantage

KW - Review

KW - Socioeconomic background

KW - Transport disadvantage

KW - Urban planning

KW - policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030252042&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jth.2017.09.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jth.2017.09.002

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 256

EP - 263

JO - Journal of Transport and Health

JF - Journal of Transport and Health

SN - 2214-1405

ER -