Now, the Commons

Mathieu O'NEIL, Johan Söderberg, Maurizio Teli, Stefano Zacchiroli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

As the Journal of Peer Production reaches its tenth issue, it is timely to reflect on what it set out to do, what it has achieved, and what it should do next. The Journal of Peer Production represents an attempt to emulate FOSS by circumventing the academic press system, where researchers do all the work – conceiving and disseminating calls for papers, producing and documenting research, selecting contributions, writing up research, etc – and are ‘paid’ in the form of 60-day free subscriptions to for-profit journals which their university libraries already subscribe to, at exorbitant rates. In contrast, consider the core principles of science first identified by Robert Merton in 1942: universalism, disinterestedness, organised scepticism, and communism (later changed to communalism). ‘The communism of the scientific ethos’, wrote Merton, ‘is incompatible with the definition of technology as “private property” in a capitalistic economy’ (275).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-3
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Peer Production
Issue number10
Publication statusPublished - May 2017

Fingerprint

communism
private property
universalism
subscription
profit
economy
university
science

Cite this

O'NEIL, M., Söderberg, J., Teli, M., & Zacchiroli, S. (2017). Now, the Commons. Journal of Peer Production, (10), 1-3.
O'NEIL, Mathieu ; Söderberg, Johan ; Teli, Maurizio ; Zacchiroli, Stefano. / Now, the Commons. In: Journal of Peer Production. 2017 ; No. 10. pp. 1-3.
@article{dfd6e7680afa4ffb85792c54f9000151,
title = "Now, the Commons",
abstract = "As the Journal of Peer Production reaches its tenth issue, it is timely to reflect on what it set out to do, what it has achieved, and what it should do next. The Journal of Peer Production represents an attempt to emulate FOSS by circumventing the academic press system, where researchers do all the work – conceiving and disseminating calls for papers, producing and documenting research, selecting contributions, writing up research, etc – and are ‘paid’ in the form of 60-day free subscriptions to for-profit journals which their university libraries already subscribe to, at exorbitant rates. In contrast, consider the core principles of science first identified by Robert Merton in 1942: universalism, disinterestedness, organised scepticism, and communism (later changed to communalism). ‘The communism of the scientific ethos’, wrote Merton, ‘is incompatible with the definition of technology as “private property” in a capitalistic economy’ (275).",
keywords = "commons-based peer production, digital commons",
author = "Mathieu O'NEIL and Johan S{\"o}derberg and Maurizio Teli and Stefano Zacchiroli",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
language = "English",
pages = "1--3",
journal = "Journal of Peer Production",
issn = "2213-5316",
number = "10",

}

O'NEIL, M, Söderberg, J, Teli, M & Zacchiroli, S 2017, 'Now, the Commons', Journal of Peer Production, no. 10, pp. 1-3.

Now, the Commons. / O'NEIL, Mathieu; Söderberg, Johan; Teli, Maurizio; Zacchiroli, Stefano.

In: Journal of Peer Production, No. 10, 05.2017, p. 1-3.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Now, the Commons

AU - O'NEIL, Mathieu

AU - Söderberg, Johan

AU - Teli, Maurizio

AU - Zacchiroli, Stefano

PY - 2017/5

Y1 - 2017/5

N2 - As the Journal of Peer Production reaches its tenth issue, it is timely to reflect on what it set out to do, what it has achieved, and what it should do next. The Journal of Peer Production represents an attempt to emulate FOSS by circumventing the academic press system, where researchers do all the work – conceiving and disseminating calls for papers, producing and documenting research, selecting contributions, writing up research, etc – and are ‘paid’ in the form of 60-day free subscriptions to for-profit journals which their university libraries already subscribe to, at exorbitant rates. In contrast, consider the core principles of science first identified by Robert Merton in 1942: universalism, disinterestedness, organised scepticism, and communism (later changed to communalism). ‘The communism of the scientific ethos’, wrote Merton, ‘is incompatible with the definition of technology as “private property” in a capitalistic economy’ (275).

AB - As the Journal of Peer Production reaches its tenth issue, it is timely to reflect on what it set out to do, what it has achieved, and what it should do next. The Journal of Peer Production represents an attempt to emulate FOSS by circumventing the academic press system, where researchers do all the work – conceiving and disseminating calls for papers, producing and documenting research, selecting contributions, writing up research, etc – and are ‘paid’ in the form of 60-day free subscriptions to for-profit journals which their university libraries already subscribe to, at exorbitant rates. In contrast, consider the core principles of science first identified by Robert Merton in 1942: universalism, disinterestedness, organised scepticism, and communism (later changed to communalism). ‘The communism of the scientific ethos’, wrote Merton, ‘is incompatible with the definition of technology as “private property” in a capitalistic economy’ (275).

KW - commons-based peer production

KW - digital commons

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 3

JO - Journal of Peer Production

JF - Journal of Peer Production

SN - 2213-5316

IS - 10

ER -

O'NEIL M, Söderberg J, Teli M, Zacchiroli S. Now, the Commons. Journal of Peer Production. 2017 May;(10):1-3.