Nursing handovers

Do we really need them?

Amanda Sexton, Connie Chan, Malcolm Elliott, John Stuart, Rohan Jayasuriya, Patrick Crookes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

119 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: This study attempts to address the content of nursing handover when compared with formal documentation sources. Background: The nursing handover has attracted criticism in the literature in relation to its continuing role in modern nursing. Criticisms include those related to time expenditure, content, accuracy and the derogatory terms in which patients are sometimes being discussed. Methods: Twenty-three handovers, covering all shifts, from one general medical ward were audio-taped. Their content was analysed and classified according to where, within a ward's documentation systems, the information conveyed could be located. Findings: Results showed that almost 84.6% of information discussed could be located within existing ward documentation structures and 9.5% of information discussed was not relevant to ongoing patient care. Only 5.9% of handover content involved discussions related to ongoing care or ward management issues that could not be recorded in an existing documentation source. Limitations: The results of this study are representative of only one ward in one Australian Hospital. Specific documentation sources were also not checked to determine their content. Conclusion: Streamlining the nursing handover may improve the quality of the information presented and reduce the amount of time spent in handover.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)37-42
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Nursing Management
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Patient Handoff
Documentation
Patients' Rooms
Health Expenditures
Information Systems
Patient Care
Nursing

Cite this

Sexton, Amanda ; Chan, Connie ; Elliott, Malcolm ; Stuart, John ; Jayasuriya, Rohan ; Crookes, Patrick. / Nursing handovers : Do we really need them?. In: Journal of Nursing Management. 2004 ; Vol. 12, No. 1. pp. 37-42.
@article{bc46a3eee58c4f618468d81c059db241,
title = "Nursing handovers: Do we really need them?",
abstract = "Aim: This study attempts to address the content of nursing handover when compared with formal documentation sources. Background: The nursing handover has attracted criticism in the literature in relation to its continuing role in modern nursing. Criticisms include those related to time expenditure, content, accuracy and the derogatory terms in which patients are sometimes being discussed. Methods: Twenty-three handovers, covering all shifts, from one general medical ward were audio-taped. Their content was analysed and classified according to where, within a ward's documentation systems, the information conveyed could be located. Findings: Results showed that almost 84.6{\%} of information discussed could be located within existing ward documentation structures and 9.5{\%} of information discussed was not relevant to ongoing patient care. Only 5.9{\%} of handover content involved discussions related to ongoing care or ward management issues that could not be recorded in an existing documentation source. Limitations: The results of this study are representative of only one ward in one Australian Hospital. Specific documentation sources were also not checked to determine their content. Conclusion: Streamlining the nursing handover may improve the quality of the information presented and reduce the amount of time spent in handover.",
keywords = "Communication, Documentation, Handover, Nursing care plan, Patient medical record",
author = "Amanda Sexton and Connie Chan and Malcolm Elliott and John Stuart and Rohan Jayasuriya and Patrick Crookes",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2834.2004.00415.x",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "37--42",
journal = "Journal of Nursing Management",
issn = "0966-0429",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Sexton, A, Chan, C, Elliott, M, Stuart, J, Jayasuriya, R & Crookes, P 2004, 'Nursing handovers: Do we really need them?', Journal of Nursing Management, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2004.00415.x

Nursing handovers : Do we really need them? / Sexton, Amanda; Chan, Connie; Elliott, Malcolm; Stuart, John; Jayasuriya, Rohan; Crookes, Patrick.

In: Journal of Nursing Management, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.01.2004, p. 37-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nursing handovers

T2 - Do we really need them?

AU - Sexton, Amanda

AU - Chan, Connie

AU - Elliott, Malcolm

AU - Stuart, John

AU - Jayasuriya, Rohan

AU - Crookes, Patrick

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - Aim: This study attempts to address the content of nursing handover when compared with formal documentation sources. Background: The nursing handover has attracted criticism in the literature in relation to its continuing role in modern nursing. Criticisms include those related to time expenditure, content, accuracy and the derogatory terms in which patients are sometimes being discussed. Methods: Twenty-three handovers, covering all shifts, from one general medical ward were audio-taped. Their content was analysed and classified according to where, within a ward's documentation systems, the information conveyed could be located. Findings: Results showed that almost 84.6% of information discussed could be located within existing ward documentation structures and 9.5% of information discussed was not relevant to ongoing patient care. Only 5.9% of handover content involved discussions related to ongoing care or ward management issues that could not be recorded in an existing documentation source. Limitations: The results of this study are representative of only one ward in one Australian Hospital. Specific documentation sources were also not checked to determine their content. Conclusion: Streamlining the nursing handover may improve the quality of the information presented and reduce the amount of time spent in handover.

AB - Aim: This study attempts to address the content of nursing handover when compared with formal documentation sources. Background: The nursing handover has attracted criticism in the literature in relation to its continuing role in modern nursing. Criticisms include those related to time expenditure, content, accuracy and the derogatory terms in which patients are sometimes being discussed. Methods: Twenty-three handovers, covering all shifts, from one general medical ward were audio-taped. Their content was analysed and classified according to where, within a ward's documentation systems, the information conveyed could be located. Findings: Results showed that almost 84.6% of information discussed could be located within existing ward documentation structures and 9.5% of information discussed was not relevant to ongoing patient care. Only 5.9% of handover content involved discussions related to ongoing care or ward management issues that could not be recorded in an existing documentation source. Limitations: The results of this study are representative of only one ward in one Australian Hospital. Specific documentation sources were also not checked to determine their content. Conclusion: Streamlining the nursing handover may improve the quality of the information presented and reduce the amount of time spent in handover.

KW - Communication

KW - Documentation

KW - Handover

KW - Nursing care plan

KW - Patient medical record

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0842263623&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2004.00415.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2004.00415.x

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 37

EP - 42

JO - Journal of Nursing Management

JF - Journal of Nursing Management

SN - 0966-0429

IS - 1

ER -