Observations on an index of labour market flexibility

Phil Lewis, Greg Mahony

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The construction of an index of labour market flexibility offers the promise of encapsulating a range of complex factors into a single measure. The aim of this paper is to critically evaluate the construction of one such index and subject it to a preliminary empirical test by examining the rank order of just two countries, Singapore and Australia. Our empirical analysis of the evolution of the returns to skill in the two countries over a decade suggests that these rankings cannot be supported. We argue that it is only by subjecting the index to rigorous evaluation can the validity and utility of the index be assessed. The empirical results suggest that the methodology employed in the construction of this index is flawed and biased.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)299-307
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Review of Business Research Papers
Volume6
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Labour market flexibility
Singapore
Methodology
Evaluation
Empirical analysis
Empirical results
Empirical test
Factors
Ranking

Cite this

Lewis, Phil ; Mahony, Greg. / Observations on an index of labour market flexibility. In: International Review of Business Research Papers. 2010 ; Vol. 6, No. 2. pp. 299-307.
@article{ef5d094566954d19a77e9a5f7febc54d,
title = "Observations on an index of labour market flexibility",
abstract = "The construction of an index of labour market flexibility offers the promise of encapsulating a range of complex factors into a single measure. The aim of this paper is to critically evaluate the construction of one such index and subject it to a preliminary empirical test by examining the rank order of just two countries, Singapore and Australia. Our empirical analysis of the evolution of the returns to skill in the two countries over a decade suggests that these rankings cannot be supported. We argue that it is only by subjecting the index to rigorous evaluation can the validity and utility of the index be assessed. The empirical results suggest that the methodology employed in the construction of this index is flawed and biased.",
author = "Phil Lewis and Greg Mahony",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "299--307",
journal = "International Review of Business Research Papers",
issn = "1832-9543",
number = "2",

}

Observations on an index of labour market flexibility. / Lewis, Phil; Mahony, Greg.

In: International Review of Business Research Papers, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2010, p. 299-307.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Observations on an index of labour market flexibility

AU - Lewis, Phil

AU - Mahony, Greg

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The construction of an index of labour market flexibility offers the promise of encapsulating a range of complex factors into a single measure. The aim of this paper is to critically evaluate the construction of one such index and subject it to a preliminary empirical test by examining the rank order of just two countries, Singapore and Australia. Our empirical analysis of the evolution of the returns to skill in the two countries over a decade suggests that these rankings cannot be supported. We argue that it is only by subjecting the index to rigorous evaluation can the validity and utility of the index be assessed. The empirical results suggest that the methodology employed in the construction of this index is flawed and biased.

AB - The construction of an index of labour market flexibility offers the promise of encapsulating a range of complex factors into a single measure. The aim of this paper is to critically evaluate the construction of one such index and subject it to a preliminary empirical test by examining the rank order of just two countries, Singapore and Australia. Our empirical analysis of the evolution of the returns to skill in the two countries over a decade suggests that these rankings cannot be supported. We argue that it is only by subjecting the index to rigorous evaluation can the validity and utility of the index be assessed. The empirical results suggest that the methodology employed in the construction of this index is flawed and biased.

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 299

EP - 307

JO - International Review of Business Research Papers

JF - International Review of Business Research Papers

SN - 1832-9543

IS - 2

ER -