On reflexivity and the conduct of the self in everyday life: Reflections on Bourdieu and Archer

Sadiya AKRAM, Anthony HOGAN

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    20 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article provides a critique of the concept of reflexivity in social theory today and argues against the tendency to define agency exclusively in terms of reflexivity. Margaret Archer, in particular, is highlighted as a key proponent of this thesis. Archer argues that late modernity is characterized by reflexivity but, in our view, this position neglects the impact of more enduring aspects of agency, such as the routinization of social life and the role of the taken-for-granted. These concepts were pivotal to Bourdieu and Giddens' theorization of everyday life and action and to Foucault's understanding of technologies of the self. We offer Bourdieu's habitus as a more nuanced approach to theorizing agency, and provide an alternative account of reflexivity. Whilst accepting that reflexivity is a core aspect of agency, we argue that it operates to a backdrop of the routinization of social life and operates from within and not outside of habitus. We highlight the role of the breach in reflexivity, suggesting that it opens up a critical window for agents to initiate change. The article suggests caution in over-ascribing reflexivity to agency, instead arguing that achieving reflexivity and change is a difficult and fraught process, which has emotional and moral consequences. The effect of this is that people often prefer the status quo, rather than to risk change and uncertainty.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)606-625
    Number of pages20
    JournalBritish Journal of Sociology
    Volume66
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2015

    Fingerprint

    reflexivity
    everyday life
    everyday action
    neglect
    modernity
    uncertainty

    Cite this

    @article{21e12bf43f2c4b728bb9e3c7c8c3f43b,
    title = "On reflexivity and the conduct of the self in everyday life: Reflections on Bourdieu and Archer",
    abstract = "This article provides a critique of the concept of reflexivity in social theory today and argues against the tendency to define agency exclusively in terms of reflexivity. Margaret Archer, in particular, is highlighted as a key proponent of this thesis. Archer argues that late modernity is characterized by reflexivity but, in our view, this position neglects the impact of more enduring aspects of agency, such as the routinization of social life and the role of the taken-for-granted. These concepts were pivotal to Bourdieu and Giddens' theorization of everyday life and action and to Foucault's understanding of technologies of the self. We offer Bourdieu's habitus as a more nuanced approach to theorizing agency, and provide an alternative account of reflexivity. Whilst accepting that reflexivity is a core aspect of agency, we argue that it operates to a backdrop of the routinization of social life and operates from within and not outside of habitus. We highlight the role of the breach in reflexivity, suggesting that it opens up a critical window for agents to initiate change. The article suggests caution in over-ascribing reflexivity to agency, instead arguing that achieving reflexivity and change is a difficult and fraught process, which has emotional and moral consequences. The effect of this is that people often prefer the status quo, rather than to risk change and uncertainty.",
    keywords = "Archer, Bourdieu, Breach, Everyday life, Habitus, Reflexivity, Routinization, breach, everyday life, habitus, routinization",
    author = "Sadiya AKRAM and Anthony HOGAN",
    year = "2015",
    month = "12",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1111/1468-4446.12150",
    language = "English",
    volume = "66",
    pages = "606--625",
    journal = "British Journal of Sociology",
    issn = "0007-1315",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "4",

    }

    On reflexivity and the conduct of the self in everyday life: Reflections on Bourdieu and Archer. / AKRAM, Sadiya; HOGAN, Anthony.

    In: British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 66, No. 4, 01.12.2015, p. 606-625.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - On reflexivity and the conduct of the self in everyday life: Reflections on Bourdieu and Archer

    AU - AKRAM, Sadiya

    AU - HOGAN, Anthony

    PY - 2015/12/1

    Y1 - 2015/12/1

    N2 - This article provides a critique of the concept of reflexivity in social theory today and argues against the tendency to define agency exclusively in terms of reflexivity. Margaret Archer, in particular, is highlighted as a key proponent of this thesis. Archer argues that late modernity is characterized by reflexivity but, in our view, this position neglects the impact of more enduring aspects of agency, such as the routinization of social life and the role of the taken-for-granted. These concepts were pivotal to Bourdieu and Giddens' theorization of everyday life and action and to Foucault's understanding of technologies of the self. We offer Bourdieu's habitus as a more nuanced approach to theorizing agency, and provide an alternative account of reflexivity. Whilst accepting that reflexivity is a core aspect of agency, we argue that it operates to a backdrop of the routinization of social life and operates from within and not outside of habitus. We highlight the role of the breach in reflexivity, suggesting that it opens up a critical window for agents to initiate change. The article suggests caution in over-ascribing reflexivity to agency, instead arguing that achieving reflexivity and change is a difficult and fraught process, which has emotional and moral consequences. The effect of this is that people often prefer the status quo, rather than to risk change and uncertainty.

    AB - This article provides a critique of the concept of reflexivity in social theory today and argues against the tendency to define agency exclusively in terms of reflexivity. Margaret Archer, in particular, is highlighted as a key proponent of this thesis. Archer argues that late modernity is characterized by reflexivity but, in our view, this position neglects the impact of more enduring aspects of agency, such as the routinization of social life and the role of the taken-for-granted. These concepts were pivotal to Bourdieu and Giddens' theorization of everyday life and action and to Foucault's understanding of technologies of the self. We offer Bourdieu's habitus as a more nuanced approach to theorizing agency, and provide an alternative account of reflexivity. Whilst accepting that reflexivity is a core aspect of agency, we argue that it operates to a backdrop of the routinization of social life and operates from within and not outside of habitus. We highlight the role of the breach in reflexivity, suggesting that it opens up a critical window for agents to initiate change. The article suggests caution in over-ascribing reflexivity to agency, instead arguing that achieving reflexivity and change is a difficult and fraught process, which has emotional and moral consequences. The effect of this is that people often prefer the status quo, rather than to risk change and uncertainty.

    KW - Archer

    KW - Bourdieu

    KW - Breach

    KW - Everyday life

    KW - Habitus

    KW - Reflexivity

    KW - Routinization

    KW - breach

    KW - everyday life

    KW - habitus

    KW - routinization

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954386325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/reflexivity-conduct-self-everyday-life-reflections-bourdieu-archer

    U2 - 10.1111/1468-4446.12150

    DO - 10.1111/1468-4446.12150

    M3 - Article

    VL - 66

    SP - 606

    EP - 625

    JO - British Journal of Sociology

    JF - British Journal of Sociology

    SN - 0007-1315

    IS - 4

    ER -