On the concept of climate debt: its moral and political value

Jonathan Pickering, Christian Barry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A range of developing countries and international advocacy organizations have argued that wealthy countries, as a result of their greater historical contribution to human-induced climate change, owe a ‘climate debt’ to poor countries. Critics of this argument have claimed that it is incoherent or morally objectionable. In this essay we clarify the concept of climate debt and assess its value for conceptualizing responsibilities associated with global climate change and for guiding international climate negotiations. We conclude that the idea of a climate debt can be coherently formulated, and that while some understandings of the idea of climate debt could lead to morally objectionable conclusions, other accounts would not. However, we argue that climate debt nevertheless provides an unhelpful frame for advancing global justice through international climate negotiations – the only existing means of resolving political conflict over the collective action problems posed by human-induced climate change – due to its retrospective and potentially adversarial emphasis, and to problems of measurement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)667-685
Number of pages19
JournalCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
Volume15
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

indebtedness
climate
Values
climate change
political conflict
International Organizations
Climate
Debt
Political Values
Moral Values
collective behavior
critic
justice
developing country
responsibility
Climate Change

Cite this

@article{6942f504447f4b7cb527f1affaf58ae3,
title = "On the concept of climate debt: its moral and political value",
abstract = "A range of developing countries and international advocacy organizations have argued that wealthy countries, as a result of their greater historical contribution to human-induced climate change, owe a ‘climate debt’ to poor countries. Critics of this argument have claimed that it is incoherent or morally objectionable. In this essay we clarify the concept of climate debt and assess its value for conceptualizing responsibilities associated with global climate change and for guiding international climate negotiations. We conclude that the idea of a climate debt can be coherently formulated, and that while some understandings of the idea of climate debt could lead to morally objectionable conclusions, other accounts would not. However, we argue that climate debt nevertheless provides an unhelpful frame for advancing global justice through international climate negotiations – the only existing means of resolving political conflict over the collective action problems posed by human-induced climate change – due to its retrospective and potentially adversarial emphasis, and to problems of measurement.",
keywords = "climate debt, climate, global justice, international climate, negotiations",
author = "Jonathan Pickering and Christian Barry",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1080/13698230.2012.727311",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "667--685",
journal = "Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (CRISPP)",
issn = "1369-8230",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "5",

}

On the concept of climate debt: its moral and political value. / Pickering, Jonathan; Barry, Christian.

In: Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Vol. 15, No. 5, 2012, p. 667-685.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the concept of climate debt: its moral and political value

AU - Pickering, Jonathan

AU - Barry, Christian

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - A range of developing countries and international advocacy organizations have argued that wealthy countries, as a result of their greater historical contribution to human-induced climate change, owe a ‘climate debt’ to poor countries. Critics of this argument have claimed that it is incoherent or morally objectionable. In this essay we clarify the concept of climate debt and assess its value for conceptualizing responsibilities associated with global climate change and for guiding international climate negotiations. We conclude that the idea of a climate debt can be coherently formulated, and that while some understandings of the idea of climate debt could lead to morally objectionable conclusions, other accounts would not. However, we argue that climate debt nevertheless provides an unhelpful frame for advancing global justice through international climate negotiations – the only existing means of resolving political conflict over the collective action problems posed by human-induced climate change – due to its retrospective and potentially adversarial emphasis, and to problems of measurement.

AB - A range of developing countries and international advocacy organizations have argued that wealthy countries, as a result of their greater historical contribution to human-induced climate change, owe a ‘climate debt’ to poor countries. Critics of this argument have claimed that it is incoherent or morally objectionable. In this essay we clarify the concept of climate debt and assess its value for conceptualizing responsibilities associated with global climate change and for guiding international climate negotiations. We conclude that the idea of a climate debt can be coherently formulated, and that while some understandings of the idea of climate debt could lead to morally objectionable conclusions, other accounts would not. However, we argue that climate debt nevertheless provides an unhelpful frame for advancing global justice through international climate negotiations – the only existing means of resolving political conflict over the collective action problems posed by human-induced climate change – due to its retrospective and potentially adversarial emphasis, and to problems of measurement.

KW - climate debt

KW - climate

KW - global justice

KW - international climate

KW - negotiations

U2 - 10.1080/13698230.2012.727311

DO - 10.1080/13698230.2012.727311

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 667

EP - 685

JO - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (CRISPP)

JF - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (CRISPP)

SN - 1369-8230

IS - 5

ER -