On the Use of Imagery for Climate Change Engagement

Saffron O'Neill, Maxwell Boykoff, Simon Niemeyer, Sophie Day

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

103 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article answers calls from scholars to attend to a research gap concerning the visual representation of climate change. We present results from three Q-methodology workshops held in Melbourne (Australia), Norwich (UK) and Boulder (USA) investigating engagement with climate change imagery drawn from mass media sources. Participants were provided with a concourse of climate change images drawn from a newspaper content analysis carried out across all three countries, and asked to carry out two Q-sorts: first, for salience (‘this image makes me feel climate change is important’) and second, for efficacy (‘this image makes me feel I can do something about climate change’). We found results remarkably consistent both across and within country cohorts. This may indicate the presence of a dominant, mainstream discourse around climate imagery. We found that imagery of climate impacts promotes feelings of salience, but undermines self-efficacy; that imagery of energy futures imagery promotes self-efficacy; and that images of politicians and celebrities strongly undermine saliency, and undermine self-efficacy for the Australian cohort. These results, if widely replicable, have implications for climate change communication and engagement. Our results suggest that imagery plays a role in either increasing the sense of importance of the issue of climate change (saliency), or in promoting feelings of being able to do something about climate change (efficacy) – but few, if any, images seem to do both. Communications strategies should assess the purpose of their messages, considering these findings regarding salience and efficacy in this study, and choose to employ images accordingly
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)413-421
Number of pages9
JournalGlobal Environmental Change
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

imagery
climate change
self-efficacy
climate
communication
mass media
VIP
climate effect
boulder
politician
content analysis
newspaper
communications
energy
methodology
discourse

Cite this

O'Neill, Saffron ; Boykoff, Maxwell ; Niemeyer, Simon ; Day, Sophie. / On the Use of Imagery for Climate Change Engagement. In: Global Environmental Change. 2013 ; Vol. 23, No. 2. pp. 413-421.
@article{8d8b1efc0d1f451aacbccb42443f3d9e,
title = "On the Use of Imagery for Climate Change Engagement",
abstract = "This article answers calls from scholars to attend to a research gap concerning the visual representation of climate change. We present results from three Q-methodology workshops held in Melbourne (Australia), Norwich (UK) and Boulder (USA) investigating engagement with climate change imagery drawn from mass media sources. Participants were provided with a concourse of climate change images drawn from a newspaper content analysis carried out across all three countries, and asked to carry out two Q-sorts: first, for salience (‘this image makes me feel climate change is important’) and second, for efficacy (‘this image makes me feel I can do something about climate change’). We found results remarkably consistent both across and within country cohorts. This may indicate the presence of a dominant, mainstream discourse around climate imagery. We found that imagery of climate impacts promotes feelings of salience, but undermines self-efficacy; that imagery of energy futures imagery promotes self-efficacy; and that images of politicians and celebrities strongly undermine saliency, and undermine self-efficacy for the Australian cohort. These results, if widely replicable, have implications for climate change communication and engagement. Our results suggest that imagery plays a role in either increasing the sense of importance of the issue of climate change (saliency), or in promoting feelings of being able to do something about climate change (efficacy) – but few, if any, images seem to do both. Communications strategies should assess the purpose of their messages, considering these findings regarding salience and efficacy in this study, and choose to employ images accordingly",
author = "Saffron O'Neill and Maxwell Boykoff and Simon Niemeyer and Sophie Day",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.11.006",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "413--421",
journal = "Global Environmental Change",
issn = "0959-3780",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

On the Use of Imagery for Climate Change Engagement. / O'Neill, Saffron; Boykoff, Maxwell; Niemeyer, Simon; Day, Sophie.

In: Global Environmental Change, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2013, p. 413-421.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the Use of Imagery for Climate Change Engagement

AU - O'Neill, Saffron

AU - Boykoff, Maxwell

AU - Niemeyer, Simon

AU - Day, Sophie

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This article answers calls from scholars to attend to a research gap concerning the visual representation of climate change. We present results from three Q-methodology workshops held in Melbourne (Australia), Norwich (UK) and Boulder (USA) investigating engagement with climate change imagery drawn from mass media sources. Participants were provided with a concourse of climate change images drawn from a newspaper content analysis carried out across all three countries, and asked to carry out two Q-sorts: first, for salience (‘this image makes me feel climate change is important’) and second, for efficacy (‘this image makes me feel I can do something about climate change’). We found results remarkably consistent both across and within country cohorts. This may indicate the presence of a dominant, mainstream discourse around climate imagery. We found that imagery of climate impacts promotes feelings of salience, but undermines self-efficacy; that imagery of energy futures imagery promotes self-efficacy; and that images of politicians and celebrities strongly undermine saliency, and undermine self-efficacy for the Australian cohort. These results, if widely replicable, have implications for climate change communication and engagement. Our results suggest that imagery plays a role in either increasing the sense of importance of the issue of climate change (saliency), or in promoting feelings of being able to do something about climate change (efficacy) – but few, if any, images seem to do both. Communications strategies should assess the purpose of their messages, considering these findings regarding salience and efficacy in this study, and choose to employ images accordingly

AB - This article answers calls from scholars to attend to a research gap concerning the visual representation of climate change. We present results from three Q-methodology workshops held in Melbourne (Australia), Norwich (UK) and Boulder (USA) investigating engagement with climate change imagery drawn from mass media sources. Participants were provided with a concourse of climate change images drawn from a newspaper content analysis carried out across all three countries, and asked to carry out two Q-sorts: first, for salience (‘this image makes me feel climate change is important’) and second, for efficacy (‘this image makes me feel I can do something about climate change’). We found results remarkably consistent both across and within country cohorts. This may indicate the presence of a dominant, mainstream discourse around climate imagery. We found that imagery of climate impacts promotes feelings of salience, but undermines self-efficacy; that imagery of energy futures imagery promotes self-efficacy; and that images of politicians and celebrities strongly undermine saliency, and undermine self-efficacy for the Australian cohort. These results, if widely replicable, have implications for climate change communication and engagement. Our results suggest that imagery plays a role in either increasing the sense of importance of the issue of climate change (saliency), or in promoting feelings of being able to do something about climate change (efficacy) – but few, if any, images seem to do both. Communications strategies should assess the purpose of their messages, considering these findings regarding salience and efficacy in this study, and choose to employ images accordingly

U2 - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.11.006

DO - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.11.006

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 413

EP - 421

JO - Global Environmental Change

JF - Global Environmental Change

SN - 0959-3780

IS - 2

ER -