OPALesence: Epistemological pluralism in the evaluation of a systems-wide childhood obesity prevention program

Michelle Jones, Fiona Verity, Megan Warin, Julie Ratcliffe, Lynne Cobiac, Boyd Swinburn, Margaret CARGO

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The evaluation of complex systems-wide public health interventions requires evaluation research that is underpinned by theory. This article presents and discusses the trans-disciplinary evaluation research framework developed to support the evaluation of a South Australian program called OPAL (Obesity Prevention and Lifestyle). The aim is to provide insights into the research design, methods and implementation of the evaluation and contribute to the debate on how to evaluate community-based interventions with complicated and complex aspects. In an attempt to capture the complexity of childhood obesity and the intervention, the OPAL evaluation research employs post positivist, interpretive and critical epistemologies, valuing epistemological pluralism. Each component of the multi-phase mixed methods evaluation captures different yet complementary information concerning the context, process, cost effectiveness and outcomes providing a more complete understanding of the impacts of the complex program. Evaluation research is not without challenges. Some of the tensions and challenges that arose in the establishment, planning and conduct of the OPAL program and evaluation are discussed
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-48
Number of pages20
JournalEvaluation
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

obesity
pluralism
evaluation research
childhood
evaluation
lifestyle
transdisciplinary
epistemology
research planning
public health
programme
design method
planning
costs
community
cost

Cite this

Jones, Michelle ; Verity, Fiona ; Warin, Megan ; Ratcliffe, Julie ; Cobiac, Lynne ; Swinburn, Boyd ; CARGO, Margaret. / OPALesence: Epistemological pluralism in the evaluation of a systems-wide childhood obesity prevention program. In: Evaluation. 2016 ; Vol. 22, No. 1. pp. 29-48.
@article{446fcb074ed34eb0809815408cd3cad1,
title = "OPALesence: Epistemological pluralism in the evaluation of a systems-wide childhood obesity prevention program",
abstract = "The evaluation of complex systems-wide public health interventions requires evaluation research that is underpinned by theory. This article presents and discusses the trans-disciplinary evaluation research framework developed to support the evaluation of a South Australian program called OPAL (Obesity Prevention and Lifestyle). The aim is to provide insights into the research design, methods and implementation of the evaluation and contribute to the debate on how to evaluate community-based interventions with complicated and complex aspects. In an attempt to capture the complexity of childhood obesity and the intervention, the OPAL evaluation research employs post positivist, interpretive and critical epistemologies, valuing epistemological pluralism. Each component of the multi-phase mixed methods evaluation captures different yet complementary information concerning the context, process, cost effectiveness and outcomes providing a more complete understanding of the impacts of the complex program. Evaluation research is not without challenges. Some of the tensions and challenges that arose in the establishment, planning and conduct of the OPAL program and evaluation are discussed",
keywords = "childhood obesity prevention, complex systems, epistemology, evaluation research, methodology",
author = "Michelle Jones and Fiona Verity and Megan Warin and Julie Ratcliffe and Lynne Cobiac and Boyd Swinburn and Margaret CARGO",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1177/1356389015623142",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "29--48",
journal = "Evaluation",
issn = "1356-3890",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

OPALesence: Epistemological pluralism in the evaluation of a systems-wide childhood obesity prevention program. / Jones, Michelle; Verity, Fiona; Warin, Megan; Ratcliffe, Julie; Cobiac, Lynne; Swinburn, Boyd; CARGO, Margaret.

In: Evaluation, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2016, p. 29-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - OPALesence: Epistemological pluralism in the evaluation of a systems-wide childhood obesity prevention program

AU - Jones, Michelle

AU - Verity, Fiona

AU - Warin, Megan

AU - Ratcliffe, Julie

AU - Cobiac, Lynne

AU - Swinburn, Boyd

AU - CARGO, Margaret

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The evaluation of complex systems-wide public health interventions requires evaluation research that is underpinned by theory. This article presents and discusses the trans-disciplinary evaluation research framework developed to support the evaluation of a South Australian program called OPAL (Obesity Prevention and Lifestyle). The aim is to provide insights into the research design, methods and implementation of the evaluation and contribute to the debate on how to evaluate community-based interventions with complicated and complex aspects. In an attempt to capture the complexity of childhood obesity and the intervention, the OPAL evaluation research employs post positivist, interpretive and critical epistemologies, valuing epistemological pluralism. Each component of the multi-phase mixed methods evaluation captures different yet complementary information concerning the context, process, cost effectiveness and outcomes providing a more complete understanding of the impacts of the complex program. Evaluation research is not without challenges. Some of the tensions and challenges that arose in the establishment, planning and conduct of the OPAL program and evaluation are discussed

AB - The evaluation of complex systems-wide public health interventions requires evaluation research that is underpinned by theory. This article presents and discusses the trans-disciplinary evaluation research framework developed to support the evaluation of a South Australian program called OPAL (Obesity Prevention and Lifestyle). The aim is to provide insights into the research design, methods and implementation of the evaluation and contribute to the debate on how to evaluate community-based interventions with complicated and complex aspects. In an attempt to capture the complexity of childhood obesity and the intervention, the OPAL evaluation research employs post positivist, interpretive and critical epistemologies, valuing epistemological pluralism. Each component of the multi-phase mixed methods evaluation captures different yet complementary information concerning the context, process, cost effectiveness and outcomes providing a more complete understanding of the impacts of the complex program. Evaluation research is not without challenges. Some of the tensions and challenges that arose in the establishment, planning and conduct of the OPAL program and evaluation are discussed

KW - childhood obesity prevention

KW - complex systems

KW - epistemology

KW - evaluation research

KW - methodology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953408475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/opalesence-epistemological-pluralism-evaluation-systemswide-childhood-obesity-prevention-program

U2 - 10.1177/1356389015623142

DO - 10.1177/1356389015623142

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 29

EP - 48

JO - Evaluation

JF - Evaluation

SN - 1356-3890

IS - 1

ER -