Opinion Research and the Counter‐Revolution in American Political Science

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The identity of political science, its tenuous orthodoxies and continuing divisions, is bound up with its history. The historical subject of this essay is the rise of one particular orthodoxy, the socio‐psychological model of opinion research and voting behaviour originally associated with the University of Michigan. This rise helps constitute a conservative defence of American liberal democracy in the early cold war, owing much to the peculiar politics of that era. The contemporary payoff of this historical reconstruction is an identification of the vulnerabilities and invulnerabilities of the model as highlighted by its struggles with the understandings it superseded and the contingent political context of these struggles. The substantial legacy for the discipline as a whole merits careful critical scrutiny, especially given changes in the political context since the 1950s, and the end of the cold war.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)679-694
Number of pages16
JournalPolitical Studies
Volume40
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

counterrevolution
opinion research
political science
cold war
voting behavior
vulnerability
reconstruction
democracy
politics
history

Cite this

@article{56f5abc83e404941b50c74a871057721,
title = "Opinion Research and the Counter‐Revolution in American Political Science",
abstract = "The identity of political science, its tenuous orthodoxies and continuing divisions, is bound up with its history. The historical subject of this essay is the rise of one particular orthodoxy, the socio‐psychological model of opinion research and voting behaviour originally associated with the University of Michigan. This rise helps constitute a conservative defence of American liberal democracy in the early cold war, owing much to the peculiar politics of that era. The contemporary payoff of this historical reconstruction is an identification of the vulnerabilities and invulnerabilities of the model as highlighted by its struggles with the understandings it superseded and the contingent political context of these struggles. The substantial legacy for the discipline as a whole merits careful critical scrutiny, especially given changes in the political context since the 1950s, and the end of the cold war.",
author = "Dryzek, {John S.}",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9248.1992.tb01792.x",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "679--694",
journal = "Political Studies",
issn = "0032-3217",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Opinion Research and the Counter‐Revolution in American Political Science. / Dryzek, John S.

In: Political Studies, Vol. 40, No. 4, 1992, p. 679-694.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Opinion Research and the Counter‐Revolution in American Political Science

AU - Dryzek, John S.

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - The identity of political science, its tenuous orthodoxies and continuing divisions, is bound up with its history. The historical subject of this essay is the rise of one particular orthodoxy, the socio‐psychological model of opinion research and voting behaviour originally associated with the University of Michigan. This rise helps constitute a conservative defence of American liberal democracy in the early cold war, owing much to the peculiar politics of that era. The contemporary payoff of this historical reconstruction is an identification of the vulnerabilities and invulnerabilities of the model as highlighted by its struggles with the understandings it superseded and the contingent political context of these struggles. The substantial legacy for the discipline as a whole merits careful critical scrutiny, especially given changes in the political context since the 1950s, and the end of the cold war.

AB - The identity of political science, its tenuous orthodoxies and continuing divisions, is bound up with its history. The historical subject of this essay is the rise of one particular orthodoxy, the socio‐psychological model of opinion research and voting behaviour originally associated with the University of Michigan. This rise helps constitute a conservative defence of American liberal democracy in the early cold war, owing much to the peculiar politics of that era. The contemporary payoff of this historical reconstruction is an identification of the vulnerabilities and invulnerabilities of the model as highlighted by its struggles with the understandings it superseded and the contingent political context of these struggles. The substantial legacy for the discipline as a whole merits careful critical scrutiny, especially given changes in the political context since the 1950s, and the end of the cold war.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981568579&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1992.tb01792.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1992.tb01792.x

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 679

EP - 694

JO - Political Studies

JF - Political Studies

SN - 0032-3217

IS - 4

ER -