Optimising flow management for ecological response and consumptive use

Sue POWELL, Sue NICHOLS, J. Webb, Siobhan De Little, Brenda DYACK

    Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

    Abstract

    The regulation of flow in river systems and use of water for consumptive and economic purposes has led to detrimental effects on riverine, wetland and floodplain environments in river systems worldwide. In recent years, there has been a concerted effort to develop policies to return water to the environment to minimise these effects. However, there are far fewer instances of actual flows being delivered. One barrier to the delivery of environmental flows is the need to balance environmental and consumptive outcomes, optimising returns for both with a limited volume of water. Various methods are available to help define the flows required to protect specific ecological assets or to mimic aspects of natural flow regimes, but few consider consumptive uses as part of the same set of calculations. In this paper, we present a method of evaluating flow options using ecological response models incorporated into daily hydrology and irrigation river management models. A multi-objective optimisation approach produces the Pareto frontier of non-dominated solutions, which provides decision makers with a range of alternative optimal management options. An integrated water resource model of the Goulburn River, Victoria, Australia, is developed that represents the rivers, water storages, operational constraints, water management and consumptive demands on a daily time-scale linked to climate. Models of ecological responses to flow are incorporated into the river model to simulate ecological response and generate environmental flow demands. Storage volumes are used to determine water allocations which in turn determine the area irrigated and relative value of the crop mix. We develop this eco-hydrology model and optimisation approach as a ‘proof of concept’ example, where the objective functions are to minimise terrestrial vegetation encroachment into the main river channel through the use of environmental flows, while maximising the net relative value of irrigation. The model is run over 35 years and the results indicate that a range of optimal solutions exist. In the best case for irrigation there is a net relative value (over the 35 years) of almost $17B while terrestrial vegetation encroachment could average approximately 13%. In contrast, it would be possible to reduce the terrestrial vegetation encroachment to just 2%, however, this would reduce net relative value of irrigation to around $12B. Interestingly the latter option would also result in some short-term periods of very high vegetation encroachment. This was because of much lower overall storage volumes resulting in 0% water allocations in some years. Our results highlight the importance of hydrological modelling of both consumptive use and ecological response to understand the feedback mechanism of some management decisions. Between the two extremes are a range of results that provide a clear understanding of what outcomes could be expected for both of the objective functions for all optimised solutions. The results presented in this paper are applied to a simple representation of the Goulburn River with limited model testing to illustrate the concept and value of integrating ecological response models into hydrological river management models, and how multi-objective optimisation tools can be applied to water management issues. The hydrological feedback loops that occur when environmental flows and consumptive water are ordered and delivered can be complex. Therefore the eco-hydrology and allocation systems must be modelled concurrently to understand the implications and trade-offs involved in managing water allocations.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publication20th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM2013)
    Subtitle of host publicationAdapting to Change - The Multiple Roles of Modelling
    EditorsJ Piantadosi, R.S Anderssen, J Boland
    Place of PublicationAustralia
    PublisherThe Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc.
    Pages1854-1860
    Number of pages7
    ISBN (Print)9780987214331
    Publication statusPublished - 2013
    Event20th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation - Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
    Duration: 1 Dec 20136 Dec 2013

    Conference

    Conference20th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation
    CountryAustralia
    CityAdelaide
    Period1/12/136/12/13

    Fingerprint

    irrigation
    river management
    hydrology
    vegetation
    water
    river system
    water management
    river
    hydrological modeling
    feedback mechanism
    river channel
    water storage
    river water
    floodplain
    water resource
    wetland
    timescale
    crop
    allocation
    climate

    Cite this

    POWELL, S., NICHOLS, S., Webb, J., De Little, S., & DYACK, B. (2013). Optimising flow management for ecological response and consumptive use. In J. Piantadosi, R. S. Anderssen, & J. Boland (Eds.), 20th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM2013): Adapting to Change - The Multiple Roles of Modelling (pp. 1854-1860). Australia: The Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc..
    POWELL, Sue ; NICHOLS, Sue ; Webb, J. ; De Little, Siobhan ; DYACK, Brenda. / Optimising flow management for ecological response and consumptive use. 20th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM2013): Adapting to Change - The Multiple Roles of Modelling. editor / J Piantadosi ; R.S Anderssen ; J Boland. Australia : The Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc., 2013. pp. 1854-1860
    @inproceedings{85645ccc1dc84db2aa8a32acbe6fbdbd,
    title = "Optimising flow management for ecological response and consumptive use",
    abstract = "The regulation of flow in river systems and use of water for consumptive and economic purposes has led to detrimental effects on riverine, wetland and floodplain environments in river systems worldwide. In recent years, there has been a concerted effort to develop policies to return water to the environment to minimise these effects. However, there are far fewer instances of actual flows being delivered. One barrier to the delivery of environmental flows is the need to balance environmental and consumptive outcomes, optimising returns for both with a limited volume of water. Various methods are available to help define the flows required to protect specific ecological assets or to mimic aspects of natural flow regimes, but few consider consumptive uses as part of the same set of calculations. In this paper, we present a method of evaluating flow options using ecological response models incorporated into daily hydrology and irrigation river management models. A multi-objective optimisation approach produces the Pareto frontier of non-dominated solutions, which provides decision makers with a range of alternative optimal management options. An integrated water resource model of the Goulburn River, Victoria, Australia, is developed that represents the rivers, water storages, operational constraints, water management and consumptive demands on a daily time-scale linked to climate. Models of ecological responses to flow are incorporated into the river model to simulate ecological response and generate environmental flow demands. Storage volumes are used to determine water allocations which in turn determine the area irrigated and relative value of the crop mix. We develop this eco-hydrology model and optimisation approach as a ‘proof of concept’ example, where the objective functions are to minimise terrestrial vegetation encroachment into the main river channel through the use of environmental flows, while maximising the net relative value of irrigation. The model is run over 35 years and the results indicate that a range of optimal solutions exist. In the best case for irrigation there is a net relative value (over the 35 years) of almost $17B while terrestrial vegetation encroachment could average approximately 13{\%}. In contrast, it would be possible to reduce the terrestrial vegetation encroachment to just 2{\%}, however, this would reduce net relative value of irrigation to around $12B. Interestingly the latter option would also result in some short-term periods of very high vegetation encroachment. This was because of much lower overall storage volumes resulting in 0{\%} water allocations in some years. Our results highlight the importance of hydrological modelling of both consumptive use and ecological response to understand the feedback mechanism of some management decisions. Between the two extremes are a range of results that provide a clear understanding of what outcomes could be expected for both of the objective functions for all optimised solutions. The results presented in this paper are applied to a simple representation of the Goulburn River with limited model testing to illustrate the concept and value of integrating ecological response models into hydrological river management models, and how multi-objective optimisation tools can be applied to water management issues. The hydrological feedback loops that occur when environmental flows and consumptive water are ordered and delivered can be complex. Therefore the eco-hydrology and allocation systems must be modelled concurrently to understand the implications and trade-offs involved in managing water allocations.",
    author = "Sue POWELL and Sue NICHOLS and J. Webb and {De Little}, Siobhan and Brenda DYACK",
    year = "2013",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "9780987214331",
    pages = "1854--1860",
    editor = "J Piantadosi and R.S Anderssen and J Boland",
    booktitle = "20th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM2013)",
    publisher = "The Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc.",

    }

    POWELL, S, NICHOLS, S, Webb, J, De Little, S & DYACK, B 2013, Optimising flow management for ecological response and consumptive use. in J Piantadosi, RS Anderssen & J Boland (eds), 20th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM2013): Adapting to Change - The Multiple Roles of Modelling. The Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc., Australia, pp. 1854-1860, 20th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Adelaide, Australia, 1/12/13.

    Optimising flow management for ecological response and consumptive use. / POWELL, Sue; NICHOLS, Sue; Webb, J.; De Little, Siobhan; DYACK, Brenda.

    20th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM2013): Adapting to Change - The Multiple Roles of Modelling. ed. / J Piantadosi; R.S Anderssen; J Boland. Australia : The Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc., 2013. p. 1854-1860.

    Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Optimising flow management for ecological response and consumptive use

    AU - POWELL, Sue

    AU - NICHOLS, Sue

    AU - Webb, J.

    AU - De Little, Siobhan

    AU - DYACK, Brenda

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - The regulation of flow in river systems and use of water for consumptive and economic purposes has led to detrimental effects on riverine, wetland and floodplain environments in river systems worldwide. In recent years, there has been a concerted effort to develop policies to return water to the environment to minimise these effects. However, there are far fewer instances of actual flows being delivered. One barrier to the delivery of environmental flows is the need to balance environmental and consumptive outcomes, optimising returns for both with a limited volume of water. Various methods are available to help define the flows required to protect specific ecological assets or to mimic aspects of natural flow regimes, but few consider consumptive uses as part of the same set of calculations. In this paper, we present a method of evaluating flow options using ecological response models incorporated into daily hydrology and irrigation river management models. A multi-objective optimisation approach produces the Pareto frontier of non-dominated solutions, which provides decision makers with a range of alternative optimal management options. An integrated water resource model of the Goulburn River, Victoria, Australia, is developed that represents the rivers, water storages, operational constraints, water management and consumptive demands on a daily time-scale linked to climate. Models of ecological responses to flow are incorporated into the river model to simulate ecological response and generate environmental flow demands. Storage volumes are used to determine water allocations which in turn determine the area irrigated and relative value of the crop mix. We develop this eco-hydrology model and optimisation approach as a ‘proof of concept’ example, where the objective functions are to minimise terrestrial vegetation encroachment into the main river channel through the use of environmental flows, while maximising the net relative value of irrigation. The model is run over 35 years and the results indicate that a range of optimal solutions exist. In the best case for irrigation there is a net relative value (over the 35 years) of almost $17B while terrestrial vegetation encroachment could average approximately 13%. In contrast, it would be possible to reduce the terrestrial vegetation encroachment to just 2%, however, this would reduce net relative value of irrigation to around $12B. Interestingly the latter option would also result in some short-term periods of very high vegetation encroachment. This was because of much lower overall storage volumes resulting in 0% water allocations in some years. Our results highlight the importance of hydrological modelling of both consumptive use and ecological response to understand the feedback mechanism of some management decisions. Between the two extremes are a range of results that provide a clear understanding of what outcomes could be expected for both of the objective functions for all optimised solutions. The results presented in this paper are applied to a simple representation of the Goulburn River with limited model testing to illustrate the concept and value of integrating ecological response models into hydrological river management models, and how multi-objective optimisation tools can be applied to water management issues. The hydrological feedback loops that occur when environmental flows and consumptive water are ordered and delivered can be complex. Therefore the eco-hydrology and allocation systems must be modelled concurrently to understand the implications and trade-offs involved in managing water allocations.

    AB - The regulation of flow in river systems and use of water for consumptive and economic purposes has led to detrimental effects on riverine, wetland and floodplain environments in river systems worldwide. In recent years, there has been a concerted effort to develop policies to return water to the environment to minimise these effects. However, there are far fewer instances of actual flows being delivered. One barrier to the delivery of environmental flows is the need to balance environmental and consumptive outcomes, optimising returns for both with a limited volume of water. Various methods are available to help define the flows required to protect specific ecological assets or to mimic aspects of natural flow regimes, but few consider consumptive uses as part of the same set of calculations. In this paper, we present a method of evaluating flow options using ecological response models incorporated into daily hydrology and irrigation river management models. A multi-objective optimisation approach produces the Pareto frontier of non-dominated solutions, which provides decision makers with a range of alternative optimal management options. An integrated water resource model of the Goulburn River, Victoria, Australia, is developed that represents the rivers, water storages, operational constraints, water management and consumptive demands on a daily time-scale linked to climate. Models of ecological responses to flow are incorporated into the river model to simulate ecological response and generate environmental flow demands. Storage volumes are used to determine water allocations which in turn determine the area irrigated and relative value of the crop mix. We develop this eco-hydrology model and optimisation approach as a ‘proof of concept’ example, where the objective functions are to minimise terrestrial vegetation encroachment into the main river channel through the use of environmental flows, while maximising the net relative value of irrigation. The model is run over 35 years and the results indicate that a range of optimal solutions exist. In the best case for irrigation there is a net relative value (over the 35 years) of almost $17B while terrestrial vegetation encroachment could average approximately 13%. In contrast, it would be possible to reduce the terrestrial vegetation encroachment to just 2%, however, this would reduce net relative value of irrigation to around $12B. Interestingly the latter option would also result in some short-term periods of very high vegetation encroachment. This was because of much lower overall storage volumes resulting in 0% water allocations in some years. Our results highlight the importance of hydrological modelling of both consumptive use and ecological response to understand the feedback mechanism of some management decisions. Between the two extremes are a range of results that provide a clear understanding of what outcomes could be expected for both of the objective functions for all optimised solutions. The results presented in this paper are applied to a simple representation of the Goulburn River with limited model testing to illustrate the concept and value of integrating ecological response models into hydrological river management models, and how multi-objective optimisation tools can be applied to water management issues. The hydrological feedback loops that occur when environmental flows and consumptive water are ordered and delivered can be complex. Therefore the eco-hydrology and allocation systems must be modelled concurrently to understand the implications and trade-offs involved in managing water allocations.

    M3 - Conference contribution

    SN - 9780987214331

    SP - 1854

    EP - 1860

    BT - 20th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM2013)

    A2 - Piantadosi, J

    A2 - Anderssen, R.S

    A2 - Boland, J

    PB - The Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc.

    CY - Australia

    ER -

    POWELL S, NICHOLS S, Webb J, De Little S, DYACK B. Optimising flow management for ecological response and consumptive use. In Piantadosi J, Anderssen RS, Boland J, editors, 20th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM2013): Adapting to Change - The Multiple Roles of Modelling. Australia: The Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc. 2013. p. 1854-1860