Optimizing the exposure indicator as a dose management strategy in computed radiography

Euclid Seeram, Stewart Bushong, Hans Swan, Rob DAVIDSON

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate a technique for optimizing radiation dose and image quality for a computed radiography system. Methods: Entrance skin doses were measured for phantom models of the pelvis and lumbar spine imaged using the vendor's recommended exposure settings (ie, the reference doses) as well as doses above and below the vendor's recommended settings for both body parts. Images were assessed using visual grading analysis (VGA). Results: The phantom dosimetry results revealed strong positive linear relationships between dose and milliampere seconds (mAs), mAs and inverse exposure indicator (EI), and dose and inverse EI for both body parts. The VGA showed that optimized values of 16 mAs/EI = 136 for the anteroposterior (AP) pelvis and 32 mAs/EI ? 139 for the AP lumbar spine did not compromise image quality. Discussion: Selecting optimized mAs reduced dose by 36% compared with the vendor's recommended mAs (dose) values. Conclusion: Optimizing the mAs and associated EIs can be an effective dose management strategy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)380-391
Number of pages12
JournalRadiologic Technology
Volume87
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2016

Fingerprint

Radiography
Pelvis
Human Body
Spine
Radiation
Skin

Cite this

Seeram, Euclid ; Bushong, Stewart ; Swan, Hans ; DAVIDSON, Rob. / Optimizing the exposure indicator as a dose management strategy in computed radiography. In: Radiologic Technology. 2016 ; Vol. 87, No. 4. pp. 380-391.
@article{9e37e23bead74f6a9120ea7cb68b726e,
title = "Optimizing the exposure indicator as a dose management strategy in computed radiography",
abstract = "Purpose: To investigate a technique for optimizing radiation dose and image quality for a computed radiography system. Methods: Entrance skin doses were measured for phantom models of the pelvis and lumbar spine imaged using the vendor's recommended exposure settings (ie, the reference doses) as well as doses above and below the vendor's recommended settings for both body parts. Images were assessed using visual grading analysis (VGA). Results: The phantom dosimetry results revealed strong positive linear relationships between dose and milliampere seconds (mAs), mAs and inverse exposure indicator (EI), and dose and inverse EI for both body parts. The VGA showed that optimized values of 16 mAs/EI = 136 for the anteroposterior (AP) pelvis and 32 mAs/EI ? 139 for the AP lumbar spine did not compromise image quality. Discussion: Selecting optimized mAs reduced dose by 36{\%} compared with the vendor's recommended mAs (dose) values. Conclusion: Optimizing the mAs and associated EIs can be an effective dose management strategy.",
keywords = "Dose optimization, Entrance skin dose, Exposure indicator, Visual grading analysis",
author = "Euclid Seeram and Stewart Bushong and Hans Swan and Rob DAVIDSON",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "380--391",
journal = "Radiologic Technology",
issn = "0033-8397",
publisher = "Grune And Stratton",
number = "4",

}

Optimizing the exposure indicator as a dose management strategy in computed radiography. / Seeram, Euclid; Bushong, Stewart; Swan, Hans; DAVIDSON, Rob.

In: Radiologic Technology, Vol. 87, No. 4, 03.2016, p. 380-391.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimizing the exposure indicator as a dose management strategy in computed radiography

AU - Seeram, Euclid

AU - Bushong, Stewart

AU - Swan, Hans

AU - DAVIDSON, Rob

PY - 2016/3

Y1 - 2016/3

N2 - Purpose: To investigate a technique for optimizing radiation dose and image quality for a computed radiography system. Methods: Entrance skin doses were measured for phantom models of the pelvis and lumbar spine imaged using the vendor's recommended exposure settings (ie, the reference doses) as well as doses above and below the vendor's recommended settings for both body parts. Images were assessed using visual grading analysis (VGA). Results: The phantom dosimetry results revealed strong positive linear relationships between dose and milliampere seconds (mAs), mAs and inverse exposure indicator (EI), and dose and inverse EI for both body parts. The VGA showed that optimized values of 16 mAs/EI = 136 for the anteroposterior (AP) pelvis and 32 mAs/EI ? 139 for the AP lumbar spine did not compromise image quality. Discussion: Selecting optimized mAs reduced dose by 36% compared with the vendor's recommended mAs (dose) values. Conclusion: Optimizing the mAs and associated EIs can be an effective dose management strategy.

AB - Purpose: To investigate a technique for optimizing radiation dose and image quality for a computed radiography system. Methods: Entrance skin doses were measured for phantom models of the pelvis and lumbar spine imaged using the vendor's recommended exposure settings (ie, the reference doses) as well as doses above and below the vendor's recommended settings for both body parts. Images were assessed using visual grading analysis (VGA). Results: The phantom dosimetry results revealed strong positive linear relationships between dose and milliampere seconds (mAs), mAs and inverse exposure indicator (EI), and dose and inverse EI for both body parts. The VGA showed that optimized values of 16 mAs/EI = 136 for the anteroposterior (AP) pelvis and 32 mAs/EI ? 139 for the AP lumbar spine did not compromise image quality. Discussion: Selecting optimized mAs reduced dose by 36% compared with the vendor's recommended mAs (dose) values. Conclusion: Optimizing the mAs and associated EIs can be an effective dose management strategy.

KW - Dose optimization

KW - Entrance skin dose

KW - Exposure indicator

KW - Visual grading analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960533314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.radiologictechnology.org/content/87/4/380.abstract

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 380

EP - 391

JO - Radiologic Technology

JF - Radiologic Technology

SN - 0033-8397

IS - 4

ER -