Organisational factors for learning in the Australian gas pipeline industry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Accident analyses have captured critical moments where warnings have been shown to go ignored, and the scale of what could go wrong misjudged. These shortcomings need not be viewed as individual professional failures. Rather, expertise and professionalism can be viewed as the outcome of the organisational and institutional contexts that support or inhibit them. This article argues that building expertise is a necessary and resource-intensive process that requires ongoing and largely informal processes that support professionals and maximise the connections between daily work and potential disasters. These processes and connections are most effective when supported by organisations structurally, through resourcing, through a culture of reporting and when lessons are used to update an organisation’s rules and procedures. These findings are based on semi-structured interviews with 34 engineers in the Australian gas pipeline industry.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)896-909
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Risk Research
Volume18
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

gas industry
Gas pipelines
expertise
Disasters
learning
Industry
Accidents
Engineers
engineer
disaster
accident
interview
resources
Gas
Organizational factors
Expertise

Cite this

@article{00ff1efda27c41ca852c229b9bcb3a99,
title = "Organisational factors for learning in the Australian gas pipeline industry",
abstract = "Accident analyses have captured critical moments where warnings have been shown to go ignored, and the scale of what could go wrong misjudged. These shortcomings need not be viewed as individual professional failures. Rather, expertise and professionalism can be viewed as the outcome of the organisational and institutional contexts that support or inhibit them. This article argues that building expertise is a necessary and resource-intensive process that requires ongoing and largely informal processes that support professionals and maximise the connections between daily work and potential disasters. These processes and connections are most effective when supported by organisations structurally, through resourcing, through a culture of reporting and when lessons are used to update an organisation’s rules and procedures. These findings are based on semi-structured interviews with 34 engineers in the Australian gas pipeline industry.",
keywords = "expertise, learning, organisations, safety, sociology",
author = "Sarah MASLEN",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/13669877.2014.919514",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "896--909",
journal = "Journal of Risk Research",
issn = "1366-9877",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "7",

}

Organisational factors for learning in the Australian gas pipeline industry. / MASLEN, Sarah.

In: Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 18, No. 7, 2015, p. 896-909.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Organisational factors for learning in the Australian gas pipeline industry

AU - MASLEN, Sarah

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Accident analyses have captured critical moments where warnings have been shown to go ignored, and the scale of what could go wrong misjudged. These shortcomings need not be viewed as individual professional failures. Rather, expertise and professionalism can be viewed as the outcome of the organisational and institutional contexts that support or inhibit them. This article argues that building expertise is a necessary and resource-intensive process that requires ongoing and largely informal processes that support professionals and maximise the connections between daily work and potential disasters. These processes and connections are most effective when supported by organisations structurally, through resourcing, through a culture of reporting and when lessons are used to update an organisation’s rules and procedures. These findings are based on semi-structured interviews with 34 engineers in the Australian gas pipeline industry.

AB - Accident analyses have captured critical moments where warnings have been shown to go ignored, and the scale of what could go wrong misjudged. These shortcomings need not be viewed as individual professional failures. Rather, expertise and professionalism can be viewed as the outcome of the organisational and institutional contexts that support or inhibit them. This article argues that building expertise is a necessary and resource-intensive process that requires ongoing and largely informal processes that support professionals and maximise the connections between daily work and potential disasters. These processes and connections are most effective when supported by organisations structurally, through resourcing, through a culture of reporting and when lessons are used to update an organisation’s rules and procedures. These findings are based on semi-structured interviews with 34 engineers in the Australian gas pipeline industry.

KW - expertise

KW - learning

KW - organisations

KW - safety

KW - sociology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938424172&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/organisational-factors-learning-australian-gas-pipeline-industry

U2 - 10.1080/13669877.2014.919514

DO - 10.1080/13669877.2014.919514

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 896

EP - 909

JO - Journal of Risk Research

JF - Journal of Risk Research

SN - 1366-9877

IS - 7

ER -