Organizational Trust and the Limits of Management-Based Regulation

Neil Gunningham, Darren Sinclair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between management-based regulation and occupational health and safety through two case studies. The first describes how corporate occupational health and safety systems and standards were interpreted and implemented differently at different mine sites within the same company and examines the particular role of trust between workers and management in explaining variations in occupational health and safety performance. The second explores the difficulties of moving from a highly devolved system of responsibility to a more centralized approach, and the incapacity of externally mandated management-based regulation to change behavior at site level in the absence of a supportive workplace culture. The article argues that notwithstanding the heavy emphasis currently being placed on both internal (company-driven) and external (government-driven) management-based regulation, a commitment at corporate level does not necessarily percolate down to individual facilities where ritualistic responses or resistant subcultures may thwart effective change. The findings have important implications for the effectiveness of management-based regulation and meta-regulation more broadly.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)865-900
Number of pages36
JournalLaw and Society Review
Volume43
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

regulation
management
health
subculture
workplace
commitment
worker
responsibility
performance

Cite this

@article{d7d136a2b6864628b6070762b18a16d6,
title = "Organizational Trust and the Limits of Management-Based Regulation",
abstract = "This article examines the relationship between management-based regulation and occupational health and safety through two case studies. The first describes how corporate occupational health and safety systems and standards were interpreted and implemented differently at different mine sites within the same company and examines the particular role of trust between workers and management in explaining variations in occupational health and safety performance. The second explores the difficulties of moving from a highly devolved system of responsibility to a more centralized approach, and the incapacity of externally mandated management-based regulation to change behavior at site level in the absence of a supportive workplace culture. The article argues that notwithstanding the heavy emphasis currently being placed on both internal (company-driven) and external (government-driven) management-based regulation, a commitment at corporate level does not necessarily percolate down to individual facilities where ritualistic responses or resistant subcultures may thwart effective change. The findings have important implications for the effectiveness of management-based regulation and meta-regulation more broadly.",
author = "Neil Gunningham and Darren Sinclair",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00391.x",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "865--900",
journal = "Law and Society Review",
issn = "0023-9216",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Organizational Trust and the Limits of Management-Based Regulation. / Gunningham, Neil; Sinclair, Darren.

In: Law and Society Review, Vol. 43, No. 4, 2009, p. 865-900.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Organizational Trust and the Limits of Management-Based Regulation

AU - Gunningham, Neil

AU - Sinclair, Darren

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - This article examines the relationship between management-based regulation and occupational health and safety through two case studies. The first describes how corporate occupational health and safety systems and standards were interpreted and implemented differently at different mine sites within the same company and examines the particular role of trust between workers and management in explaining variations in occupational health and safety performance. The second explores the difficulties of moving from a highly devolved system of responsibility to a more centralized approach, and the incapacity of externally mandated management-based regulation to change behavior at site level in the absence of a supportive workplace culture. The article argues that notwithstanding the heavy emphasis currently being placed on both internal (company-driven) and external (government-driven) management-based regulation, a commitment at corporate level does not necessarily percolate down to individual facilities where ritualistic responses or resistant subcultures may thwart effective change. The findings have important implications for the effectiveness of management-based regulation and meta-regulation more broadly.

AB - This article examines the relationship between management-based regulation and occupational health and safety through two case studies. The first describes how corporate occupational health and safety systems and standards were interpreted and implemented differently at different mine sites within the same company and examines the particular role of trust between workers and management in explaining variations in occupational health and safety performance. The second explores the difficulties of moving from a highly devolved system of responsibility to a more centralized approach, and the incapacity of externally mandated management-based regulation to change behavior at site level in the absence of a supportive workplace culture. The article argues that notwithstanding the heavy emphasis currently being placed on both internal (company-driven) and external (government-driven) management-based regulation, a commitment at corporate level does not necessarily percolate down to individual facilities where ritualistic responses or resistant subcultures may thwart effective change. The findings have important implications for the effectiveness of management-based regulation and meta-regulation more broadly.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72249085191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00391.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00391.x

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 865

EP - 900

JO - Law and Society Review

JF - Law and Society Review

SN - 0023-9216

IS - 4

ER -