TY - JOUR
T1 - Orienting the Sustainable Management of Chemicals and Waste toward Indigenous Knowledge
AU - Ataria, James M.
AU - Murphy, Michelle
AU - McGregor, Deborah
AU - Chiblow, Susan
AU - Moggridge, Bradley J.
AU - Hikuroa, Daniel C.H.
AU - Tremblay, Louis A.
AU - Öberg, Gunilla
AU - Baker, Virginia
AU - Brooks, Bryan W.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was partly funded by a Royal Society of New Zealand Catalyst Leaders grant (ILF-CAW2201) and New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment Endeavour Research Programme grants (CAWX1708 and C03X1802).
PY - 2023/8/1
Y1 - 2023/8/1
N2 - Chemical production, usage, and waste generation continue to increase globally, with the negative impacts on public health and the environment being most prevalent in urban and peri-urban landscapes and in areas bordering extraction sites. These impacts are more pronounced for low- and middle-income regions, communities of color, and other vulnerable groups, particularly Indigenous peoples. These disproportionate societal and environmental injustices are exacerbated by the deliberate location of chemical production and waste management activities proximal to these vulnerable communities and traditional homelands, the accelerating pace of production, and the cumulative and unforeseen impacts of inappropriately managed chemicals and waste. In many areas, including parts of developed countries and particularly in the Global South, intersections of environmental justice with unsustainable chemicals and waste trajectories are palpable, especially considering the legacies of economic, social, and medical disparities. In response, the past decade has seen the development of Indigenous Data Sovereignty practices, including innovative protocols for data that affirm and enact Indigenous modes of governance, which can be incorporated within chemicals management practices. The governance and management of chemicals are plagued with epistemological injustice, rooted in colonialism that continues to exclude Indigenous peoples and their knowledge from meaningful and respectful engagements, reinforcing and reflecting a science-policy bias. The United Nations’ recent report on plastic and pollution, which at its heart is about chemical pollution, does not mention Indigenous peoples or knowledge. (1) We applaud the development of the 10 key principles developed by Ågerstrand and colleagues for the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Panel on Chemicals, Waste and Pollution Prevention (2) but further expand from these principles to include consideration of Indigenous peoples and knowledge.
AB - Chemical production, usage, and waste generation continue to increase globally, with the negative impacts on public health and the environment being most prevalent in urban and peri-urban landscapes and in areas bordering extraction sites. These impacts are more pronounced for low- and middle-income regions, communities of color, and other vulnerable groups, particularly Indigenous peoples. These disproportionate societal and environmental injustices are exacerbated by the deliberate location of chemical production and waste management activities proximal to these vulnerable communities and traditional homelands, the accelerating pace of production, and the cumulative and unforeseen impacts of inappropriately managed chemicals and waste. In many areas, including parts of developed countries and particularly in the Global South, intersections of environmental justice with unsustainable chemicals and waste trajectories are palpable, especially considering the legacies of economic, social, and medical disparities. In response, the past decade has seen the development of Indigenous Data Sovereignty practices, including innovative protocols for data that affirm and enact Indigenous modes of governance, which can be incorporated within chemicals management practices. The governance and management of chemicals are plagued with epistemological injustice, rooted in colonialism that continues to exclude Indigenous peoples and their knowledge from meaningful and respectful engagements, reinforcing and reflecting a science-policy bias. The United Nations’ recent report on plastic and pollution, which at its heart is about chemical pollution, does not mention Indigenous peoples or knowledge. (1) We applaud the development of the 10 key principles developed by Ågerstrand and colleagues for the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Panel on Chemicals, Waste and Pollution Prevention (2) but further expand from these principles to include consideration of Indigenous peoples and knowledge.
KW - chemical production
KW - environmental injustice
KW - environmental protection
KW - pollution
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166427397&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.est.3c04600
DO - 10.1021/acs.est.3c04600
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 37459445
AN - SCOPUS:85166427397
SN - 0013-936X
VL - 57
SP - 10901
EP - 10903
JO - Environmental Science and Technology
JF - Environmental Science and Technology
IS - 30
ER -