Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the pacing profiles between distance- and duration-based trials of short and long duration. Thirteen trained cyclists completed 2 time-based (6 and 30 min) and 2 distance-based (4 and 20 km) self-paced cycling time trials. Participants were instructed to complete each trial with the highest average power output. Ratings of perceived exertion (RPEs) were measured throughout the trials. Average power output was not different between the 4-km and 6-min trials (324 ± 46 vs 325 ± 45 W; P = .96) or between the 20-km and 30-min trials (271 ± 44 vs 267 ± 38 W; P = .24). Power output was greater on commencement of the distance-based trials when short and long trials were analyzed together. Furthermore, the rate of decline in power output over the 1st 40% of the trial was greater in the 20-km trial than in the 30-min trial (P = .01) but not different between the 4-km and the 6-min trials (P = .13). RPE was greater in the 4-km trial than in the 6-min trial but not different between the 20-km and 30-min trials. These findings indicate that athletes commenced distance-based time trials at relatively higher power outputs than a similar time-based trial. Such findings may result from discrete differences in our ability to judge or predict an exercise endpoint when performing time- and distance-based trials.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1018-1023 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
Difference in Pacing Between Time- and Distance-Based Time Trials in Trained Cyclists. / Abbiss, Chris R; Thompson, Kevin G.; Lipski, Marcin; Meyer, Tim; SKORSKI, Sabrina.
In: International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, Vol. 11, No. 8, 2016, p. 1018-1023.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Difference in Pacing Between Time- and Distance-Based Time Trials in Trained Cyclists
AU - Abbiss, Chris R
AU - Thompson, Kevin G.
AU - Lipski, Marcin
AU - Meyer, Tim
AU - SKORSKI, Sabrina
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare the pacing profiles between distance- and duration-based trials of short and long duration. Thirteen trained cyclists completed 2 time-based (6 and 30 min) and 2 distance-based (4 and 20 km) self-paced cycling time trials. Participants were instructed to complete each trial with the highest average power output. Ratings of perceived exertion (RPEs) were measured throughout the trials. Average power output was not different between the 4-km and 6-min trials (324 ± 46 vs 325 ± 45 W; P = .96) or between the 20-km and 30-min trials (271 ± 44 vs 267 ± 38 W; P = .24). Power output was greater on commencement of the distance-based trials when short and long trials were analyzed together. Furthermore, the rate of decline in power output over the 1st 40% of the trial was greater in the 20-km trial than in the 30-min trial (P = .01) but not different between the 4-km and the 6-min trials (P = .13). RPE was greater in the 4-km trial than in the 6-min trial but not different between the 20-km and 30-min trials. These findings indicate that athletes commenced distance-based time trials at relatively higher power outputs than a similar time-based trial. Such findings may result from discrete differences in our ability to judge or predict an exercise endpoint when performing time- and distance-based trials.
AB - The purpose of this study was to compare the pacing profiles between distance- and duration-based trials of short and long duration. Thirteen trained cyclists completed 2 time-based (6 and 30 min) and 2 distance-based (4 and 20 km) self-paced cycling time trials. Participants were instructed to complete each trial with the highest average power output. Ratings of perceived exertion (RPEs) were measured throughout the trials. Average power output was not different between the 4-km and 6-min trials (324 ± 46 vs 325 ± 45 W; P = .96) or between the 20-km and 30-min trials (271 ± 44 vs 267 ± 38 W; P = .24). Power output was greater on commencement of the distance-based trials when short and long trials were analyzed together. Furthermore, the rate of decline in power output over the 1st 40% of the trial was greater in the 20-km trial than in the 30-min trial (P = .01) but not different between the 4-km and the 6-min trials (P = .13). RPE was greater in the 4-km trial than in the 6-min trial but not different between the 20-km and 30-min trials. These findings indicate that athletes commenced distance-based time trials at relatively higher power outputs than a similar time-based trial. Such findings may result from discrete differences in our ability to judge or predict an exercise endpoint when performing time- and distance-based trials.
KW - pacing strategy
KW - starting strategy
KW - feedback
KW - cycling
KW - Cycling
KW - Pacing strategy
KW - Feedback
KW - Starting strategy
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Physical Endurance
KW - Feedback, Psychological
KW - Exercise Test
KW - Time Factors
KW - Adult
KW - Female
KW - Muscle Fatigue
KW - Muscle Strength
KW - Oxygen Consumption
KW - Competitive Behavior
KW - Muscle Contraction
KW - Self Concept
KW - Bicycling
KW - Exercise Tolerance
KW - Time and Motion Studies
KW - Muscle, Skeletal/physiology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008194175&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/difference-pacing-between-time-distancebased-time-trials-trained-cyclists
U2 - 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0613
DO - 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0613
M3 - Article
VL - 11
SP - 1018
EP - 1023
JO - International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
JF - International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
SN - 1555-0265
IS - 8
ER -