Pair programming teams and high-quality knowledge sharing: A comparative study of coopetitive reward structures

Shahla Ghobadi, John CAMPBELL, Stewart Clegg

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    There has been a growing research interest in understanding knowledge sharing in agile development. Yet, empirical research that sheds light on its underlying practices, such as pair programming, is evolving. This study uses insights from coopetition and software literature to focus inquiry on the relation between coopetitive rewards and high-quality knowledge sharing in pair programming teams. Theoretical hypotheses are developed and validated, suggesting that: ‘coopetitive rewards influence high-quality knowledge sharing both directly and over time through their impact on the level of knowledge sharing satisfaction’, and, ‘the impact of coopetitive rewards on high-quality knowledge sharing is dependent upon task complexity and the history of working under similar reward structure’. This study generates new understanding related to the use of rewards in pair programming teams, and offers a rigorous and replicable seven-step experimental process for simulating coopetitive structures and investigating their role in pair programming and in similar collaborative contexts.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)397-409
    Number of pages13
    JournalInformation Systems Frontiers
    Volume19
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Fingerprint

    Knowledge Sharing
    Reward
    Comparative Study
    Programming
    Empirical Research
    Software
    Dependent

    Cite this

    Ghobadi, Shahla ; CAMPBELL, John ; Clegg, Stewart. / Pair programming teams and high-quality knowledge sharing: A comparative study of coopetitive reward structures. In: Information Systems Frontiers. 2017 ; Vol. 19, No. 2. pp. 397-409.
    @article{729c66524565492db7f524527833e145,
    title = "Pair programming teams and high-quality knowledge sharing: A comparative study of coopetitive reward structures",
    abstract = "There has been a growing research interest in understanding knowledge sharing in agile development. Yet, empirical research that sheds light on its underlying practices, such as pair programming, is evolving. This study uses insights from coopetition and software literature to focus inquiry on the relation between coopetitive rewards and high-quality knowledge sharing in pair programming teams. Theoretical hypotheses are developed and validated, suggesting that: ‘coopetitive rewards influence high-quality knowledge sharing both directly and over time through their impact on the level of knowledge sharing satisfaction’, and, ‘the impact of coopetitive rewards on high-quality knowledge sharing is dependent upon task complexity and the history of working under similar reward structure’. This study generates new understanding related to the use of rewards in pair programming teams, and offers a rigorous and replicable seven-step experimental process for simulating coopetitive structures and investigating their role in pair programming and in similar collaborative contexts.",
    keywords = "Pair programming – Agile development – Software team – Knowledge sharing – Information sharing – Rewards – Coopetition – Competitive reward – Cooperation – Competition, Competition, Competitive reward, Software team, Agile development, Cooperation, Information sharing, Pair programming, Rewards, Knowledge sharing, Coopetition",
    author = "Shahla Ghobadi and John CAMPBELL and Stewart Clegg",
    year = "2017",
    doi = "10.1007/s10796-015-9603-0",
    language = "English",
    volume = "19",
    pages = "397--409",
    journal = "Information Systems Frontiers",
    issn = "1387-3326",
    publisher = "Springer",
    number = "2",

    }

    Pair programming teams and high-quality knowledge sharing: A comparative study of coopetitive reward structures. / Ghobadi, Shahla; CAMPBELL, John; Clegg, Stewart.

    In: Information Systems Frontiers, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2017, p. 397-409.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Pair programming teams and high-quality knowledge sharing: A comparative study of coopetitive reward structures

    AU - Ghobadi, Shahla

    AU - CAMPBELL, John

    AU - Clegg, Stewart

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - There has been a growing research interest in understanding knowledge sharing in agile development. Yet, empirical research that sheds light on its underlying practices, such as pair programming, is evolving. This study uses insights from coopetition and software literature to focus inquiry on the relation between coopetitive rewards and high-quality knowledge sharing in pair programming teams. Theoretical hypotheses are developed and validated, suggesting that: ‘coopetitive rewards influence high-quality knowledge sharing both directly and over time through their impact on the level of knowledge sharing satisfaction’, and, ‘the impact of coopetitive rewards on high-quality knowledge sharing is dependent upon task complexity and the history of working under similar reward structure’. This study generates new understanding related to the use of rewards in pair programming teams, and offers a rigorous and replicable seven-step experimental process for simulating coopetitive structures and investigating their role in pair programming and in similar collaborative contexts.

    AB - There has been a growing research interest in understanding knowledge sharing in agile development. Yet, empirical research that sheds light on its underlying practices, such as pair programming, is evolving. This study uses insights from coopetition and software literature to focus inquiry on the relation between coopetitive rewards and high-quality knowledge sharing in pair programming teams. Theoretical hypotheses are developed and validated, suggesting that: ‘coopetitive rewards influence high-quality knowledge sharing both directly and over time through their impact on the level of knowledge sharing satisfaction’, and, ‘the impact of coopetitive rewards on high-quality knowledge sharing is dependent upon task complexity and the history of working under similar reward structure’. This study generates new understanding related to the use of rewards in pair programming teams, and offers a rigorous and replicable seven-step experimental process for simulating coopetitive structures and investigating their role in pair programming and in similar collaborative contexts.

    KW - Pair programming – Agile development – Software team – Knowledge sharing – Information sharing – Rewards – Coopetition – Competitive reward – Cooperation – Competition

    KW - Competition

    KW - Competitive reward

    KW - Software team

    KW - Agile development

    KW - Cooperation

    KW - Information sharing

    KW - Pair programming

    KW - Rewards

    KW - Knowledge sharing

    KW - Coopetition

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944916665&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/pair-programming-teams-highquality-knowledge-sharing-comparative-study-coopetitive-reward-structures

    U2 - 10.1007/s10796-015-9603-0

    DO - 10.1007/s10796-015-9603-0

    M3 - Article

    VL - 19

    SP - 397

    EP - 409

    JO - Information Systems Frontiers

    JF - Information Systems Frontiers

    SN - 1387-3326

    IS - 2

    ER -