Paradigm change and uncertainty about funding of public health research: Social and scientific implications

M. Daniel, L. W. Green, S. B. Sheps

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the 1970s two fundamental shifts have occurred in health research funding: a reduction in the buying power of research dollars, and an increase in the competition for resources. Most fields have also seen a decrease in the dollars available for research. Pressures for justifying the relevance of research activities have become increasingly pragmatic. The thesis of this paper is that scientific creativity and innovation are compromised by the highly uncertain and competitive funding environment of contemporary health research. This is largely because criteria of scientific excellence predicated on an investigation's presumed future impact support the status quo of methods and subject matter in funded research. Extraordinary rationality among scientists seeking and allocating resources promotes the survival of the existing system over time, yet inhibits progressive development through the transformation of conceptual models. Therefore, despite a growing unrest about the way research on population health is conducted, new conceptions of the relationship between theory and methods have been slow to emerge. Amelioration of a disjunction between the institutionalized rules governing science and the culturally sanctioned goals of science requires commitment to a dialectic between orthodoxy and dissent.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-56
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Health and Social Policy
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

paradigm change
social research
Uncertainty
public health
Public Health
funding
uncertainty
Research
dollar
Health
health
Dissent and Disputes
Creativity
resource
science
dialectics
resources
rationality
creativity
pragmatics

Cite this

@article{0b008bd704e34dbe9f2409d19e094bb1,
title = "Paradigm change and uncertainty about funding of public health research: Social and scientific implications",
abstract = "Since the 1970s two fundamental shifts have occurred in health research funding: a reduction in the buying power of research dollars, and an increase in the competition for resources. Most fields have also seen a decrease in the dollars available for research. Pressures for justifying the relevance of research activities have become increasingly pragmatic. The thesis of this paper is that scientific creativity and innovation are compromised by the highly uncertain and competitive funding environment of contemporary health research. This is largely because criteria of scientific excellence predicated on an investigation's presumed future impact support the status quo of methods and subject matter in funded research. Extraordinary rationality among scientists seeking and allocating resources promotes the survival of the existing system over time, yet inhibits progressive development through the transformation of conceptual models. Therefore, despite a growing unrest about the way research on population health is conducted, new conceptions of the relationship between theory and methods have been slow to emerge. Amelioration of a disjunction between the institutionalized rules governing science and the culturally sanctioned goals of science requires commitment to a dialectic between orthodoxy and dissent.",
keywords = "Decision Making, economic competition, Health services research, Public Health",
author = "M. Daniel and Green, {L. W.} and Sheps, {S. B.}",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1300/J045v10n02_04",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "39--56",
journal = "Journal of Health and Social Policy",
issn = "0897-7186",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Paradigm change and uncertainty about funding of public health research: Social and scientific implications. / Daniel, M.; Green, L. W.; Sheps, S. B.

In: Journal of Health and Social Policy, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1998, p. 39-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paradigm change and uncertainty about funding of public health research: Social and scientific implications

AU - Daniel, M.

AU - Green, L. W.

AU - Sheps, S. B.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Since the 1970s two fundamental shifts have occurred in health research funding: a reduction in the buying power of research dollars, and an increase in the competition for resources. Most fields have also seen a decrease in the dollars available for research. Pressures for justifying the relevance of research activities have become increasingly pragmatic. The thesis of this paper is that scientific creativity and innovation are compromised by the highly uncertain and competitive funding environment of contemporary health research. This is largely because criteria of scientific excellence predicated on an investigation's presumed future impact support the status quo of methods and subject matter in funded research. Extraordinary rationality among scientists seeking and allocating resources promotes the survival of the existing system over time, yet inhibits progressive development through the transformation of conceptual models. Therefore, despite a growing unrest about the way research on population health is conducted, new conceptions of the relationship between theory and methods have been slow to emerge. Amelioration of a disjunction between the institutionalized rules governing science and the culturally sanctioned goals of science requires commitment to a dialectic between orthodoxy and dissent.

AB - Since the 1970s two fundamental shifts have occurred in health research funding: a reduction in the buying power of research dollars, and an increase in the competition for resources. Most fields have also seen a decrease in the dollars available for research. Pressures for justifying the relevance of research activities have become increasingly pragmatic. The thesis of this paper is that scientific creativity and innovation are compromised by the highly uncertain and competitive funding environment of contemporary health research. This is largely because criteria of scientific excellence predicated on an investigation's presumed future impact support the status quo of methods and subject matter in funded research. Extraordinary rationality among scientists seeking and allocating resources promotes the survival of the existing system over time, yet inhibits progressive development through the transformation of conceptual models. Therefore, despite a growing unrest about the way research on population health is conducted, new conceptions of the relationship between theory and methods have been slow to emerge. Amelioration of a disjunction between the institutionalized rules governing science and the culturally sanctioned goals of science requires commitment to a dialectic between orthodoxy and dissent.

KW - Decision Making

KW - economic competition

KW - Health services research

KW - Public Health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031832469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1300/J045v10n02_04

DO - 10.1300/J045v10n02_04

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 39

EP - 56

JO - Journal of Health and Social Policy

JF - Journal of Health and Social Policy

SN - 0897-7186

IS - 2

ER -