Patching the ‘Legal Black Hole’: The Extraterritorial Reach of States’ Human Rights Duties in the African Human Rights System

Takele BULTO

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article analyses (the scope of) the legal obligations owed by African states under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights directly to residents of third states in Africa in the realisation of such non-residents’ human and peoples’ rights guaranteed in the premier continental human rights instrument. The central question is whether a state owes the quartet layers of obligations (to ‘respect, protect, promote and fulfil’) for the realisation of Charter-based guarantees only to those within its own borders or also to those beyond (in another state’s territory). The article thus examines the question of to whom – only to those within or also to those outside a state’s territory – the state’s human rights obligations are owed and on whose behalf the obligations are to be fulfilled in the context of the African Charter. In order to answer this question, the article analyses the corpus of the African Charter, related jurisprudence of the African Commission, and relevant international and regional human rights treaties and case law, which may be relied upon as ‘inspirational sources’ for the interpretation and application of the African Charter. The article demonstrates that the African Charter allows wide latitude for the extraterritorial application of human and peoples’ rights, state duties and the Charterbased remedies it enshrines.

‘[I]t is space, not time, that hides consequences from us’.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)249-278
Number of pages30
JournalSouth African Journal on Human Rights
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

charter
human rights
obligation
case law
jurisprudence
treaty
remedies
guarantee
respect
resident
interpretation

Cite this

@article{e591c73dac6f442298a66561ee3357a4,
title = "Patching the ‘Legal Black Hole’: The Extraterritorial Reach of States’ Human Rights Duties in the African Human Rights System",
abstract = "This article analyses (the scope of) the legal obligations owed by African states under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights directly to residents of third states in Africa in the realisation of such non-residents’ human and peoples’ rights guaranteed in the premier continental human rights instrument. The central question is whether a state owes the quartet layers of obligations (to ‘respect, protect, promote and fulfil’) for the realisation of Charter-based guarantees only to those within its own borders or also to those beyond (in another state’s territory). The article thus examines the question of to whom – only to those within or also to those outside a state’s territory – the state’s human rights obligations are owed and on whose behalf the obligations are to be fulfilled in the context of the African Charter. In order to answer this question, the article analyses the corpus of the African Charter, related jurisprudence of the African Commission, and relevant international and regional human rights treaties and case law, which may be relied upon as ‘inspirational sources’ for the interpretation and application of the African Charter. The article demonstrates that the African Charter allows wide latitude for the extraterritorial application of human and peoples’ rights, state duties and the Charterbased remedies it enshrines.‘[I]t is space, not time, that hides consequences from us’.",
author = "Takele BULTO",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1080/19962126.2011.11865015",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "249--278",
journal = "South African Journal on Human Rights",
issn = "0258-7203",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patching the ‘Legal Black Hole’: The Extraterritorial Reach of States’ Human Rights Duties in the African Human Rights System

AU - BULTO, Takele

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This article analyses (the scope of) the legal obligations owed by African states under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights directly to residents of third states in Africa in the realisation of such non-residents’ human and peoples’ rights guaranteed in the premier continental human rights instrument. The central question is whether a state owes the quartet layers of obligations (to ‘respect, protect, promote and fulfil’) for the realisation of Charter-based guarantees only to those within its own borders or also to those beyond (in another state’s territory). The article thus examines the question of to whom – only to those within or also to those outside a state’s territory – the state’s human rights obligations are owed and on whose behalf the obligations are to be fulfilled in the context of the African Charter. In order to answer this question, the article analyses the corpus of the African Charter, related jurisprudence of the African Commission, and relevant international and regional human rights treaties and case law, which may be relied upon as ‘inspirational sources’ for the interpretation and application of the African Charter. The article demonstrates that the African Charter allows wide latitude for the extraterritorial application of human and peoples’ rights, state duties and the Charterbased remedies it enshrines.‘[I]t is space, not time, that hides consequences from us’.

AB - This article analyses (the scope of) the legal obligations owed by African states under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights directly to residents of third states in Africa in the realisation of such non-residents’ human and peoples’ rights guaranteed in the premier continental human rights instrument. The central question is whether a state owes the quartet layers of obligations (to ‘respect, protect, promote and fulfil’) for the realisation of Charter-based guarantees only to those within its own borders or also to those beyond (in another state’s territory). The article thus examines the question of to whom – only to those within or also to those outside a state’s territory – the state’s human rights obligations are owed and on whose behalf the obligations are to be fulfilled in the context of the African Charter. In order to answer this question, the article analyses the corpus of the African Charter, related jurisprudence of the African Commission, and relevant international and regional human rights treaties and case law, which may be relied upon as ‘inspirational sources’ for the interpretation and application of the African Charter. The article demonstrates that the African Charter allows wide latitude for the extraterritorial application of human and peoples’ rights, state duties and the Charterbased remedies it enshrines.‘[I]t is space, not time, that hides consequences from us’.

U2 - 10.1080/19962126.2011.11865015

DO - 10.1080/19962126.2011.11865015

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 249

EP - 278

JO - South African Journal on Human Rights

JF - South African Journal on Human Rights

SN - 0258-7203

IS - 2

ER -