TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient Experiences of Patient–Clinician Communication Among Cancer Multidisciplinary Healthcare Professionals During “Breaking Bad News”
T2 - A Qualitative Systematic Review
AU - Primeau, Charlotte
AU - Chau, Minh
AU - Turner, Murray R.
AU - Paterson, Catherine
N1 - Funding Information:
This research work was conducted by in-kind donations by Flinders University, Charles Sturt University, University of Canberra, and University of Warwick.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s)
PY - 2024/8
Y1 - 2024/8
N2 - Purpose: To explore patient experiences of patient–clinician communication during the critical moments of “breaking bad news” in cancer care. Methods: A qualitative systematic review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and has been reported according to PRISMA guidelines. Databases, including APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Scopus, were searched from the beginning of their date range coverage to April 2023. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed, and a meta-aggregation approach was used for data synthesis. Results: Twenty-eight studies were included and represented 976 patients. Key themes included (1) sensing something is wrong (prior to diagnosis), (2) reaction to the diagnosis, (3) information (during breaking bad news), (4) communication with health care professionals, (5) specialist versus nonspecialist centers, (6) decision-making, and (7) feeling supported. The review underscores the need for health care professionals to adeptly navigate and respond to individual patient needs during confronting and distressing times. Conclusions: The complexity and individuality of patient–clinician communication suggest that further education is needed among the cancer multidisciplinary team to develop personalized, empathetic communication strategies in clinical practice, catering to diverse patient preferences. The findings call for more inclusive research across different cultures and languages, and a need to understand evolving communication needs, especially in the context of increasing digital communication modalities in health care. Implications for Cancer Survivorship: This review provides valuable new insights into developing effective communication strategies that are responsive to the diverse needs of patients undergoing cancer treatment. Its findings emphasize the importance of empathy, flexibility, and a personalized approach in delivering bad news and supporting patients throughout survivorship.
AB - Purpose: To explore patient experiences of patient–clinician communication during the critical moments of “breaking bad news” in cancer care. Methods: A qualitative systematic review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and has been reported according to PRISMA guidelines. Databases, including APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Scopus, were searched from the beginning of their date range coverage to April 2023. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed, and a meta-aggregation approach was used for data synthesis. Results: Twenty-eight studies were included and represented 976 patients. Key themes included (1) sensing something is wrong (prior to diagnosis), (2) reaction to the diagnosis, (3) information (during breaking bad news), (4) communication with health care professionals, (5) specialist versus nonspecialist centers, (6) decision-making, and (7) feeling supported. The review underscores the need for health care professionals to adeptly navigate and respond to individual patient needs during confronting and distressing times. Conclusions: The complexity and individuality of patient–clinician communication suggest that further education is needed among the cancer multidisciplinary team to develop personalized, empathetic communication strategies in clinical practice, catering to diverse patient preferences. The findings call for more inclusive research across different cultures and languages, and a need to understand evolving communication needs, especially in the context of increasing digital communication modalities in health care. Implications for Cancer Survivorship: This review provides valuable new insights into developing effective communication strategies that are responsive to the diverse needs of patients undergoing cancer treatment. Its findings emphasize the importance of empathy, flexibility, and a personalized approach in delivering bad news and supporting patients throughout survivorship.
KW - Cancer
KW - Communication
KW - Healthcare providers
KW - Multidisciplinary team
KW - Qualitative systematic review
KW - Survivorship
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196866307&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151680
DO - 10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151680
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85196866307
SN - 0749-2081
SP - 1
EP - 25
JO - Seminars in Oncology Nursing
JF - Seminars in Oncology Nursing
M1 - 151680
ER -