Patterns of leadership in the Asia-Pacific: A symposium

Mark Beeson, Diane Stone

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)


Leadership at the regional level has come under the spotlight not only in the post-Cold War context, but also more recently following the global financial crisis. Yet, leadership by states within region-building and regional associations as leaders vis-à-vis other regions or powers remains relatively new territory for analysis and consideration, even though the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has attracted both admirers and sceptics. This introductory essay is intended to achieve two principal objectives regarding this symposium addressing Asia-Pacific regional leadership. First, we seek to put the 'Asia-Pacific' in historical context and identify some of the forces that have not only shaped but also hindered its realization. Recognizing China's historical role and contemporary rise is important to understand the parameters within which ASEAN and its member states seek to define particular visions of regional identity and enact collective enterprises. The other key background consideration when thinking about contemporary leadership in the Asia-Pacific is that the United States is seemingly in decline. The Asia-Pacific's two most consequential powers - the United States and China - are pervasive considerations for any regional organization that aims to lead and promote cooperation to solve collective action problems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)505-522
Number of pages18
JournalThe Pacific Review
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Patterns of leadership in the Asia-Pacific: A symposium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this