Patterns of Leadership Patterns in the Asia Pacific: A Symposium

Mark Beeson, Diane Stone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Leadership at the regional level has come under the spotlight not only in the post-Cold War context, but also more recently following the global financial crisis. Yet, leadership by states within region-building and regional associations as leaders vis-a-vis other regions or powers remains relatively new territory for analysis and consideration, even though the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has attracted both admirers and sceptics. This introductory essay is intended to achieve two principal objectives regarding this symposium addressing Asia-Pacific regional leadership. First, we seek to put the ‘Asia-Pacific’ in historical context and identify some of the forces that have not only shaped but also hindered its realization. Recognizing China’s historical role and contemporary rise is important to understand the parameters within which ASEAN and its member states seek to define particular visions of regional identity and enact collective enterprises. The other key background consideration when thinking about contemporary leadership in the Asia-Pacific is that the United States is seemingly in decline. The Asia-Pacific’s two most consequential powers the United States and China are pervasive considerations for any regional organization that aims to lead and promote cooperation to solve collective action problems.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)505-522
Number of pages18
JournalThe Pacific Review
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

leadership
ASEAN
international leading power
post-Cold War
regional identity
China
collective action
collective behavior
cold war
organization
Asia
parameter

Cite this

@article{b15a342fc3514459b69bb7e602b7e1c4,
title = "Patterns of Leadership Patterns in the Asia Pacific: A Symposium",
abstract = "Leadership at the regional level has come under the spotlight not only in the post-Cold War context, but also more recently following the global financial crisis. Yet, leadership by states within region-building and regional associations as leaders vis-a-vis other regions or powers remains relatively new territory for analysis and consideration, even though the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has attracted both admirers and sceptics. This introductory essay is intended to achieve two principal objectives regarding this symposium addressing Asia-Pacific regional leadership. First, we seek to put the ‘Asia-Pacific’ in historical context and identify some of the forces that have not only shaped but also hindered its realization. Recognizing China’s historical role and contemporary rise is important to understand the parameters within which ASEAN and its member states seek to define particular visions of regional identity and enact collective enterprises. The other key background consideration when thinking about contemporary leadership in the Asia-Pacific is that the United States is seemingly in decline. The Asia-Pacific’s two most consequential powers the United States and China are pervasive considerations for any regional organization that aims to lead and promote cooperation to solve collective action problems.",
keywords = "ASEAN, China, United States, regional leadership, Asia-Pacific",
author = "Mark Beeson and Diane Stone",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/09512748.2014.929798",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "505--522",
journal = "Pacific Review",
issn = "0951-2748",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

Patterns of Leadership Patterns in the Asia Pacific: A Symposium. / Beeson, Mark; Stone, Diane.

In: The Pacific Review, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2014, p. 505-522.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patterns of Leadership Patterns in the Asia Pacific: A Symposium

AU - Beeson, Mark

AU - Stone, Diane

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Leadership at the regional level has come under the spotlight not only in the post-Cold War context, but also more recently following the global financial crisis. Yet, leadership by states within region-building and regional associations as leaders vis-a-vis other regions or powers remains relatively new territory for analysis and consideration, even though the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has attracted both admirers and sceptics. This introductory essay is intended to achieve two principal objectives regarding this symposium addressing Asia-Pacific regional leadership. First, we seek to put the ‘Asia-Pacific’ in historical context and identify some of the forces that have not only shaped but also hindered its realization. Recognizing China’s historical role and contemporary rise is important to understand the parameters within which ASEAN and its member states seek to define particular visions of regional identity and enact collective enterprises. The other key background consideration when thinking about contemporary leadership in the Asia-Pacific is that the United States is seemingly in decline. The Asia-Pacific’s two most consequential powers the United States and China are pervasive considerations for any regional organization that aims to lead and promote cooperation to solve collective action problems.

AB - Leadership at the regional level has come under the spotlight not only in the post-Cold War context, but also more recently following the global financial crisis. Yet, leadership by states within region-building and regional associations as leaders vis-a-vis other regions or powers remains relatively new territory for analysis and consideration, even though the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has attracted both admirers and sceptics. This introductory essay is intended to achieve two principal objectives regarding this symposium addressing Asia-Pacific regional leadership. First, we seek to put the ‘Asia-Pacific’ in historical context and identify some of the forces that have not only shaped but also hindered its realization. Recognizing China’s historical role and contemporary rise is important to understand the parameters within which ASEAN and its member states seek to define particular visions of regional identity and enact collective enterprises. The other key background consideration when thinking about contemporary leadership in the Asia-Pacific is that the United States is seemingly in decline. The Asia-Pacific’s two most consequential powers the United States and China are pervasive considerations for any regional organization that aims to lead and promote cooperation to solve collective action problems.

KW - ASEAN

KW - China

KW - United States

KW - regional leadership

KW - Asia-Pacific

U2 - 10.1080/09512748.2014.929798

DO - 10.1080/09512748.2014.929798

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 505

EP - 522

JO - Pacific Review

JF - Pacific Review

SN - 0951-2748

IS - 4

ER -