Paying for elections every three years is worth it

Research output: Contribution to Newspaper/Magazine/BulletinFeatured article

Abstract

There’s an old joke about divorces. Do you know why they’re so expensive? Because they’re worth it. Elections are no different. Mr Albanese wants four-year fixed terms. Apparently, Mr Dutton used to want four-year terms but then he didn’t, and now he does again. Four-year terms might make their job easier. It might also save us some $60 billion in the next two decades. But do voters really want the federal government to have four years to mess with us? Or is it worth $3 billion each year to make our politicians work harder for us?

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Paying for elections every three years is worth it'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this