Pedagogy and deliberative democracy: insights from recent experiments in the United Kingdom

Brenton Prosser, Matthew Flinders, Will Jennings, Alan Renwick, Paolo Spada, Gerry Stoker, Katie Ghose

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A growing body of research suggests the existence of a disconnection between citizens, politicians and representative politics in advanced industrial democracies. This has led to a literature on the emergence of post-democratic or post-representative politics that connects to a parallel seam of scholarship on the capacity of deliberative democratic innovations to ‘close the gap’. This latter body of work has delivered major insights in terms of democratic design in ways that traverse ‘politics as theory’ and ‘politics as practice’. And yet the main argument of this article is that this seam of scholarship has generally failed to explore the existence of numerous pedagogical relationships that exist within the very fibre of deliberative processes. As such, the core contribution of this article focuses around the explication of a ‘pedagogical pyramid’ that applies a micro-political lens to deliberative processes. This theoretical contribution is empirically assessed with reference to a recent project that sought to test different citizen assembly pilots around plans for English regional devolution. The proposition being tested is that a better understanding of relational pedagogy within innovations is vital, not just to increase levels of knowledge, but also to build the capacity, confidence and contribution of democratically active citizens.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)210-232
Number of pages23
JournalContemporary Politics
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

deliberative democracy
politics
experiment
citizen
industrial democracy
innovation
level of knowledge
decentralization
politician
confidence

Cite this

Prosser, Brenton ; Flinders, Matthew ; Jennings, Will ; Renwick, Alan ; Spada, Paolo ; Stoker, Gerry ; Ghose, Katie. / Pedagogy and deliberative democracy: insights from recent experiments in the United Kingdom. In: Contemporary Politics. 2018 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 210-232.
@article{0f5d6051468f4d45ad7a8d84f8243901,
title = "Pedagogy and deliberative democracy: insights from recent experiments in the United Kingdom",
abstract = "A growing body of research suggests the existence of a disconnection between citizens, politicians and representative politics in advanced industrial democracies. This has led to a literature on the emergence of post-democratic or post-representative politics that connects to a parallel seam of scholarship on the capacity of deliberative democratic innovations to ‘close the gap’. This latter body of work has delivered major insights in terms of democratic design in ways that traverse ‘politics as theory’ and ‘politics as practice’. And yet the main argument of this article is that this seam of scholarship has generally failed to explore the existence of numerous pedagogical relationships that exist within the very fibre of deliberative processes. As such, the core contribution of this article focuses around the explication of a ‘pedagogical pyramid’ that applies a micro-political lens to deliberative processes. This theoretical contribution is empirically assessed with reference to a recent project that sought to test different citizen assembly pilots around plans for English regional devolution. The proposition being tested is that a better understanding of relational pedagogy within innovations is vital, not just to increase levels of knowledge, but also to build the capacity, confidence and contribution of democratically active citizens.",
keywords = "Pedagogy, micro-politics, democratic innovations, citizen’s assemblies, deliberation, learning relationships",
author = "Brenton Prosser and Matthew Flinders and Will Jennings and Alan Renwick and Paolo Spada and Gerry Stoker and Katie Ghose",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/13569775.2017.1416259",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "210--232",
journal = "Contemporary Politics",
issn = "1356-9775",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Pedagogy and deliberative democracy: insights from recent experiments in the United Kingdom. / Prosser, Brenton; Flinders, Matthew; Jennings, Will; Renwick, Alan; Spada, Paolo; Stoker, Gerry; Ghose, Katie.

In: Contemporary Politics, Vol. 24, No. 2, 04.01.2018, p. 210-232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pedagogy and deliberative democracy: insights from recent experiments in the United Kingdom

AU - Prosser, Brenton

AU - Flinders, Matthew

AU - Jennings, Will

AU - Renwick, Alan

AU - Spada, Paolo

AU - Stoker, Gerry

AU - Ghose, Katie

PY - 2018/1/4

Y1 - 2018/1/4

N2 - A growing body of research suggests the existence of a disconnection between citizens, politicians and representative politics in advanced industrial democracies. This has led to a literature on the emergence of post-democratic or post-representative politics that connects to a parallel seam of scholarship on the capacity of deliberative democratic innovations to ‘close the gap’. This latter body of work has delivered major insights in terms of democratic design in ways that traverse ‘politics as theory’ and ‘politics as practice’. And yet the main argument of this article is that this seam of scholarship has generally failed to explore the existence of numerous pedagogical relationships that exist within the very fibre of deliberative processes. As such, the core contribution of this article focuses around the explication of a ‘pedagogical pyramid’ that applies a micro-political lens to deliberative processes. This theoretical contribution is empirically assessed with reference to a recent project that sought to test different citizen assembly pilots around plans for English regional devolution. The proposition being tested is that a better understanding of relational pedagogy within innovations is vital, not just to increase levels of knowledge, but also to build the capacity, confidence and contribution of democratically active citizens.

AB - A growing body of research suggests the existence of a disconnection between citizens, politicians and representative politics in advanced industrial democracies. This has led to a literature on the emergence of post-democratic or post-representative politics that connects to a parallel seam of scholarship on the capacity of deliberative democratic innovations to ‘close the gap’. This latter body of work has delivered major insights in terms of democratic design in ways that traverse ‘politics as theory’ and ‘politics as practice’. And yet the main argument of this article is that this seam of scholarship has generally failed to explore the existence of numerous pedagogical relationships that exist within the very fibre of deliberative processes. As such, the core contribution of this article focuses around the explication of a ‘pedagogical pyramid’ that applies a micro-political lens to deliberative processes. This theoretical contribution is empirically assessed with reference to a recent project that sought to test different citizen assembly pilots around plans for English regional devolution. The proposition being tested is that a better understanding of relational pedagogy within innovations is vital, not just to increase levels of knowledge, but also to build the capacity, confidence and contribution of democratically active citizens.

KW - Pedagogy

KW - micro-politics

KW - democratic innovations

KW - citizen’s assemblies

KW - deliberation

KW - learning relationships

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043588950&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13569775.2017.1416259

DO - 10.1080/13569775.2017.1416259

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 210

EP - 232

JO - Contemporary Politics

JF - Contemporary Politics

SN - 1356-9775

IS - 2

ER -