TY - JOUR
T1 - Pedal trajectory alters maximal single-leg cycling power
AU - Martin, James C.
AU - Lamb, Scott M.
AU - Brown, Nicholas A.T.
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Purpose: Muscular power produced during in vitro cyclic contraction has been reported to vary with muscle-length trajectory. The purpose of this study was to determine whether maximal human single-leg cycling power could be similarly altered by manipulating pedal trajectory. Method: Seven trained cyclists performed maximal single-leg cycle ergometry. Pedal trajectory was manipulated by repositioning the ergometer drive sprocket off-center with respect to the crank axle, such that the leg-extension phase occupied 42, 50, or 58% of the cycle time (LEP42, LEP50, and LEP58, respectively). Results: Maximum instantaneous power was 12% greater for LEP58 (1984 ± 143 W) than LEP50 (1838 ± 126 W), which was 8% greater than that for LEP42 (1645 ± 112 W). Maximum power, averaged over a complete revolution of the crank, was 4% greater for LEP58 (636 ± 59 W) than for LEP50 (613 ± 53 W), which was 18% greater than that for LEP42 (520 ± 43 W). Conclusions: These findings, paralleling those for an in vitro model, confirmed our hypothesis that maximal single-leg cycling power could be altered by manipulating pedal trajectory. Alterations in power were likely due to concomitant effects of muscle-shortening velocity, muscle excitation, and biomechanical constraints. Additional research is needed to determine whether greater leg-extension phase ratios can elicit further increases in power and whether similar results can be obtained during bilateral cycling.
AB - Purpose: Muscular power produced during in vitro cyclic contraction has been reported to vary with muscle-length trajectory. The purpose of this study was to determine whether maximal human single-leg cycling power could be similarly altered by manipulating pedal trajectory. Method: Seven trained cyclists performed maximal single-leg cycle ergometry. Pedal trajectory was manipulated by repositioning the ergometer drive sprocket off-center with respect to the crank axle, such that the leg-extension phase occupied 42, 50, or 58% of the cycle time (LEP42, LEP50, and LEP58, respectively). Results: Maximum instantaneous power was 12% greater for LEP58 (1984 ± 143 W) than LEP50 (1838 ± 126 W), which was 8% greater than that for LEP42 (1645 ± 112 W). Maximum power, averaged over a complete revolution of the crank, was 4% greater for LEP58 (636 ± 59 W) than for LEP50 (613 ± 53 W), which was 18% greater than that for LEP42 (520 ± 43 W). Conclusions: These findings, paralleling those for an in vitro model, confirmed our hypothesis that maximal single-leg cycling power could be altered by manipulating pedal trajectory. Alterations in power were likely due to concomitant effects of muscle-shortening velocity, muscle excitation, and biomechanical constraints. Additional research is needed to determine whether greater leg-extension phase ratios can elicit further increases in power and whether similar results can be obtained during bilateral cycling.
KW - Maximal exercise
KW - Muscle
KW - Single leg
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036324655&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00005768-200208000-00015
DO - 10.1097/00005768-200208000-00015
M3 - Article
C2 - 12165689
AN - SCOPUS:0036324655
SN - 0195-9131
VL - 34
SP - 1332
EP - 1336
JO - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
JF - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
IS - 8
ER -