TY - JOUR
T1 - Performances and properties of steel and composite prestressed tendons – A review
AU - Rafieizonooz, Mahdi
AU - Jang, Hyounseung
AU - Kim, Jimin
AU - Kim, Chang Soo
AU - Kim, Taehoon
AU - Wi, Seunghwan
AU - Banihashemi, Saeed
AU - Khankhaje, Elnaz
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT; Ministry of Science and ICT) [grant numbers NRF- 2022R1A4A3026883, 2021R1A2C2004320].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024
PY - 2024/6/15
Y1 - 2024/6/15
N2 - The primary drawback of concrete lies in its low tensile strength, prompting the development of various solutions to enhance this aspect. A notable approach is the utilization of Prestressed Reinforced Concrete (PRC) with tendons, aimed at bolstering its tensile strength. As the use of diverse tendon types in the PRC continues to surge, a review becomes imperative to delve into this evolution. Therefore, this study delved into the engineering characteristics, performance, and evolution of different tendon varieties, encompassing both steel and composite options. Despite certain drawbacks associated with employing composite materials such as Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) tendons - such as heightened costs, limited availability of composite materials, and intricate manufacturing processes - there are distinct advantages and merits to incorporating FRP composite tendons in the realm of construction. In this respect, Carbon FRP tendons exhibited superior strength, comparable to their steel counterparts. Glass FRP tendons, lacking metallic components, possessed non-magnetic properties, rendering them resistant to corrosion. Additionally, Aramid FRP tendons boasted low flammability and exceptional resistance to elevated temperatures. Lastly, Basalt FRP tendons offered sustainability, rust resistance, and non-corrosiveness. The findings derived from this review study serve as a valuable resource for researchers seeking to advance the applications of steel tendons and FRP composite materials within the construction industry.
AB - The primary drawback of concrete lies in its low tensile strength, prompting the development of various solutions to enhance this aspect. A notable approach is the utilization of Prestressed Reinforced Concrete (PRC) with tendons, aimed at bolstering its tensile strength. As the use of diverse tendon types in the PRC continues to surge, a review becomes imperative to delve into this evolution. Therefore, this study delved into the engineering characteristics, performance, and evolution of different tendon varieties, encompassing both steel and composite options. Despite certain drawbacks associated with employing composite materials such as Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) tendons - such as heightened costs, limited availability of composite materials, and intricate manufacturing processes - there are distinct advantages and merits to incorporating FRP composite tendons in the realm of construction. In this respect, Carbon FRP tendons exhibited superior strength, comparable to their steel counterparts. Glass FRP tendons, lacking metallic components, possessed non-magnetic properties, rendering them resistant to corrosion. Additionally, Aramid FRP tendons boasted low flammability and exceptional resistance to elevated temperatures. Lastly, Basalt FRP tendons offered sustainability, rust resistance, and non-corrosiveness. The findings derived from this review study serve as a valuable resource for researchers seeking to advance the applications of steel tendons and FRP composite materials within the construction industry.
KW - AFRP
KW - BFRP
KW - CFRP
KW - GFRP
KW - Prestressed concrete
KW - Steel tendons
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85194222825&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31720
DO - 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31720
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85194222825
SN - 2405-8440
VL - 10
SP - 1
EP - 26
JO - Heliyon
JF - Heliyon
IS - 11
M1 - e31720
ER -