Perspective: Communicating our science to influence public policy

M.T. Barbour, LeRoy POFF, R.H. Norris, J.D. Allan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We ask 3 questions that bear on the ability of aquatic scientists to influence public perceptions and public policy related to important environmental issues: 1) Why should scientists become better communicators? 2) What can we do to promote effective communication? 3) How can scientific societies help scientists meet this communication challenge? Shareholders in the environment include watershed groups, environmental interest groups, water-quality agencies, the general public, and the scientific community. These shareholders often are not professional scientists, but they influence the formation of natural resource policies. Individual aquatic scientists should be able to explain their science to other shareholders in a way that disabuses misconceptions of scientific principles, fosters informed dialogue concerning actions that affect aquatic ecosystems, and prevents poor decisions that can result from inaccurate information or short-sightedness. Scientific societies can effectively communicate the concerns of individual scientists by: 1) articulating the links between basic research and ecological principles to applied science, thereby building the foundation of science needed to support informed decision-making; 2) translating and disseminating results of scientific research to nonscientists to minimize inaccuracies, thereby fostering scientific literacy; and 3) taking proactive positions that promote infusion of sound science into policy debates on pressing environmental issues, especially those that bear on freshwater ecosystems
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)562-569
    Number of pages8
    JournalJournal of the North American Benthological Society
    Volume27
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Fingerprint

    public policy
    environmental issue
    communication
    applied science
    literacy
    freshwater ecosystem
    communication (human)
    aquatic ecosystem
    natural resource policy
    natural resource
    decision making
    watershed
    water quality
    policy
    public
    science
    society

    Cite this

    Barbour, M.T. ; POFF, LeRoy ; Norris, R.H. ; Allan, J.D. / Perspective: Communicating our science to influence public policy. In: Journal of the North American Benthological Society. 2008 ; Vol. 27, No. 3. pp. 562-569.
    @article{5a7d4bb7d75e463ea921dfb083234822,
    title = "Perspective: Communicating our science to influence public policy",
    abstract = "We ask 3 questions that bear on the ability of aquatic scientists to influence public perceptions and public policy related to important environmental issues: 1) Why should scientists become better communicators? 2) What can we do to promote effective communication? 3) How can scientific societies help scientists meet this communication challenge? Shareholders in the environment include watershed groups, environmental interest groups, water-quality agencies, the general public, and the scientific community. These shareholders often are not professional scientists, but they influence the formation of natural resource policies. Individual aquatic scientists should be able to explain their science to other shareholders in a way that disabuses misconceptions of scientific principles, fosters informed dialogue concerning actions that affect aquatic ecosystems, and prevents poor decisions that can result from inaccurate information or short-sightedness. Scientific societies can effectively communicate the concerns of individual scientists by: 1) articulating the links between basic research and ecological principles to applied science, thereby building the foundation of science needed to support informed decision-making; 2) translating and disseminating results of scientific research to nonscientists to minimize inaccuracies, thereby fostering scientific literacy; and 3) taking proactive positions that promote infusion of sound science into policy debates on pressing environmental issues, especially those that bear on freshwater ecosystems",
    author = "M.T. Barbour and LeRoy POFF and R.H. Norris and J.D. Allan",
    note = "cited By 6",
    year = "2008",
    doi = "10.1899/07-051.1",
    language = "English",
    volume = "27",
    pages = "562--569",
    journal = "Journal of the North American Benthological Society",
    issn = "2161-9565",
    publisher = "The Society for Freshwater Science",
    number = "3",

    }

    Perspective: Communicating our science to influence public policy. / Barbour, M.T.; POFF, LeRoy; Norris, R.H.; Allan, J.D.

    In: Journal of the North American Benthological Society, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2008, p. 562-569.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Perspective: Communicating our science to influence public policy

    AU - Barbour, M.T.

    AU - POFF, LeRoy

    AU - Norris, R.H.

    AU - Allan, J.D.

    N1 - cited By 6

    PY - 2008

    Y1 - 2008

    N2 - We ask 3 questions that bear on the ability of aquatic scientists to influence public perceptions and public policy related to important environmental issues: 1) Why should scientists become better communicators? 2) What can we do to promote effective communication? 3) How can scientific societies help scientists meet this communication challenge? Shareholders in the environment include watershed groups, environmental interest groups, water-quality agencies, the general public, and the scientific community. These shareholders often are not professional scientists, but they influence the formation of natural resource policies. Individual aquatic scientists should be able to explain their science to other shareholders in a way that disabuses misconceptions of scientific principles, fosters informed dialogue concerning actions that affect aquatic ecosystems, and prevents poor decisions that can result from inaccurate information or short-sightedness. Scientific societies can effectively communicate the concerns of individual scientists by: 1) articulating the links between basic research and ecological principles to applied science, thereby building the foundation of science needed to support informed decision-making; 2) translating and disseminating results of scientific research to nonscientists to minimize inaccuracies, thereby fostering scientific literacy; and 3) taking proactive positions that promote infusion of sound science into policy debates on pressing environmental issues, especially those that bear on freshwater ecosystems

    AB - We ask 3 questions that bear on the ability of aquatic scientists to influence public perceptions and public policy related to important environmental issues: 1) Why should scientists become better communicators? 2) What can we do to promote effective communication? 3) How can scientific societies help scientists meet this communication challenge? Shareholders in the environment include watershed groups, environmental interest groups, water-quality agencies, the general public, and the scientific community. These shareholders often are not professional scientists, but they influence the formation of natural resource policies. Individual aquatic scientists should be able to explain their science to other shareholders in a way that disabuses misconceptions of scientific principles, fosters informed dialogue concerning actions that affect aquatic ecosystems, and prevents poor decisions that can result from inaccurate information or short-sightedness. Scientific societies can effectively communicate the concerns of individual scientists by: 1) articulating the links between basic research and ecological principles to applied science, thereby building the foundation of science needed to support informed decision-making; 2) translating and disseminating results of scientific research to nonscientists to minimize inaccuracies, thereby fostering scientific literacy; and 3) taking proactive positions that promote infusion of sound science into policy debates on pressing environmental issues, especially those that bear on freshwater ecosystems

    U2 - 10.1899/07-051.1

    DO - 10.1899/07-051.1

    M3 - Article

    VL - 27

    SP - 562

    EP - 569

    JO - Journal of the North American Benthological Society

    JF - Journal of the North American Benthological Society

    SN - 2161-9565

    IS - 3

    ER -