Phylodiversity to inform conservation policy: An Australian example

T Laity, Shawn Laffan, Carlos GONZALEZ-OROZCO, D Faith, D Rousauer, M Byrne, Joseph Miller, D Crayn, C Costion, Craig Moritz, K Newport

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    38 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Phylodiversity measures summarise the phylogenetic diversity patterns of groups of organisms. By using branches of the tree of life, rather than its tips (e.g., species), phylodiversity measures provide important additional information about biodiversity that can improve conservation policy and outcomes. As a biodiverse nation with a strong legislative and policy framework, Australia provides an opportunity to use phylogenetic information to inform conservation decision-making.We explored the application of phylodiversity measures across Australia with a focus on two highly biodiverse regions, the south west of Western Australia (SWWA) and the South East Queensland bioregion (SEQ). We analysed seven diverse groups of organisms spanning five separate phyla on the evolutionary tree of life, the plant genera Acacia and Daviesia, mammals, hylid frogs, myobatrachid frogs, passerine birds, and camaenid land snails. We measured species richness, weighted species endemism (WE) and two phylodiversity measures, phylogenetic diversity (PD) and phylogenetic endemism (PE), as well as their respective complementarity scores (a measure of gains and losses) at 20. km resolution.Higher PD was identified within SEQ for all fauna groups, whereas more PD was found in SWWA for both plant groups. PD and PD complementarity were strongly correlated with species richness and species complementarity for most groups but less so for plants. PD and PE were found to complement traditional species-based measures for all groups studied: PD and PE follow similar spatial patterns to richness and WE, but highlighted different areas that would not be identified by conventional species-based biodiversity analyses alone.The application of phylodiversity measures, particularly the novel weighted complementary measures considered here, in conservation can enhance protection of the evolutionary history that contributes to present day biodiversity values of areas. Phylogenetic measures in conservation can include important elements of biodiversity in conservation planning, such as evolutionary potential and feature diversity that will improve decision-making and lead to better biodiversity conservation outcomes.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)131-143
    Number of pages13
    JournalScience of the Total Environment
    Volume534
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    Biodiversity
    Conservation
    phylogenetics
    endemism
    biodiversity
    Decision making
    complementarity
    Mammals
    Information use
    Birds
    frog
    conservation policy
    History
    species richness
    decision making
    Planning
    conservation planning
    passerine
    snail
    mammal

    Cite this

    Laity, T., Laffan, S., GONZALEZ-OROZCO, C., Faith, D., Rousauer, D., Byrne, M., ... Newport, K. (2015). Phylodiversity to inform conservation policy: An Australian example. Science of the Total Environment, 534, 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.113
    Laity, T ; Laffan, Shawn ; GONZALEZ-OROZCO, Carlos ; Faith, D ; Rousauer, D ; Byrne, M ; Miller, Joseph ; Crayn, D ; Costion, C ; Moritz, Craig ; Newport, K. / Phylodiversity to inform conservation policy: An Australian example. In: Science of the Total Environment. 2015 ; Vol. 534. pp. 131-143.
    @article{fcd1b949e9314598ab23dae19ae7c06a,
    title = "Phylodiversity to inform conservation policy: An Australian example",
    abstract = "Phylodiversity measures summarise the phylogenetic diversity patterns of groups of organisms. By using branches of the tree of life, rather than its tips (e.g., species), phylodiversity measures provide important additional information about biodiversity that can improve conservation policy and outcomes. As a biodiverse nation with a strong legislative and policy framework, Australia provides an opportunity to use phylogenetic information to inform conservation decision-making.We explored the application of phylodiversity measures across Australia with a focus on two highly biodiverse regions, the south west of Western Australia (SWWA) and the South East Queensland bioregion (SEQ). We analysed seven diverse groups of organisms spanning five separate phyla on the evolutionary tree of life, the plant genera Acacia and Daviesia, mammals, hylid frogs, myobatrachid frogs, passerine birds, and camaenid land snails. We measured species richness, weighted species endemism (WE) and two phylodiversity measures, phylogenetic diversity (PD) and phylogenetic endemism (PE), as well as their respective complementarity scores (a measure of gains and losses) at 20. km resolution.Higher PD was identified within SEQ for all fauna groups, whereas more PD was found in SWWA for both plant groups. PD and PD complementarity were strongly correlated with species richness and species complementarity for most groups but less so for plants. PD and PE were found to complement traditional species-based measures for all groups studied: PD and PE follow similar spatial patterns to richness and WE, but highlighted different areas that would not be identified by conventional species-based biodiversity analyses alone.The application of phylodiversity measures, particularly the novel weighted complementary measures considered here, in conservation can enhance protection of the evolutionary history that contributes to present day biodiversity values of areas. Phylogenetic measures in conservation can include important elements of biodiversity in conservation planning, such as evolutionary potential and feature diversity that will improve decision-making and lead to better biodiversity conservation outcomes.",
    author = "T Laity and Shawn Laffan and Carlos GONZALEZ-OROZCO and D Faith and D Rousauer and M Byrne and Joseph Miller and D Crayn and C Costion and Craig Moritz and K Newport",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.113",
    language = "English",
    volume = "534",
    pages = "131--143",
    journal = "Science of the Total Environment",
    issn = "0048-9697",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    Laity, T, Laffan, S, GONZALEZ-OROZCO, C, Faith, D, Rousauer, D, Byrne, M, Miller, J, Crayn, D, Costion, C, Moritz, C & Newport, K 2015, 'Phylodiversity to inform conservation policy: An Australian example', Science of the Total Environment, vol. 534, pp. 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.113

    Phylodiversity to inform conservation policy: An Australian example. / Laity, T; Laffan, Shawn; GONZALEZ-OROZCO, Carlos; Faith, D; Rousauer, D; Byrne, M; Miller, Joseph; Crayn, D; Costion, C; Moritz, Craig; Newport, K.

    In: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 534, 2015, p. 131-143.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Phylodiversity to inform conservation policy: An Australian example

    AU - Laity, T

    AU - Laffan, Shawn

    AU - GONZALEZ-OROZCO, Carlos

    AU - Faith, D

    AU - Rousauer, D

    AU - Byrne, M

    AU - Miller, Joseph

    AU - Crayn, D

    AU - Costion, C

    AU - Moritz, Craig

    AU - Newport, K

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - Phylodiversity measures summarise the phylogenetic diversity patterns of groups of organisms. By using branches of the tree of life, rather than its tips (e.g., species), phylodiversity measures provide important additional information about biodiversity that can improve conservation policy and outcomes. As a biodiverse nation with a strong legislative and policy framework, Australia provides an opportunity to use phylogenetic information to inform conservation decision-making.We explored the application of phylodiversity measures across Australia with a focus on two highly biodiverse regions, the south west of Western Australia (SWWA) and the South East Queensland bioregion (SEQ). We analysed seven diverse groups of organisms spanning five separate phyla on the evolutionary tree of life, the plant genera Acacia and Daviesia, mammals, hylid frogs, myobatrachid frogs, passerine birds, and camaenid land snails. We measured species richness, weighted species endemism (WE) and two phylodiversity measures, phylogenetic diversity (PD) and phylogenetic endemism (PE), as well as their respective complementarity scores (a measure of gains and losses) at 20. km resolution.Higher PD was identified within SEQ for all fauna groups, whereas more PD was found in SWWA for both plant groups. PD and PD complementarity were strongly correlated with species richness and species complementarity for most groups but less so for plants. PD and PE were found to complement traditional species-based measures for all groups studied: PD and PE follow similar spatial patterns to richness and WE, but highlighted different areas that would not be identified by conventional species-based biodiversity analyses alone.The application of phylodiversity measures, particularly the novel weighted complementary measures considered here, in conservation can enhance protection of the evolutionary history that contributes to present day biodiversity values of areas. Phylogenetic measures in conservation can include important elements of biodiversity in conservation planning, such as evolutionary potential and feature diversity that will improve decision-making and lead to better biodiversity conservation outcomes.

    AB - Phylodiversity measures summarise the phylogenetic diversity patterns of groups of organisms. By using branches of the tree of life, rather than its tips (e.g., species), phylodiversity measures provide important additional information about biodiversity that can improve conservation policy and outcomes. As a biodiverse nation with a strong legislative and policy framework, Australia provides an opportunity to use phylogenetic information to inform conservation decision-making.We explored the application of phylodiversity measures across Australia with a focus on two highly biodiverse regions, the south west of Western Australia (SWWA) and the South East Queensland bioregion (SEQ). We analysed seven diverse groups of organisms spanning five separate phyla on the evolutionary tree of life, the plant genera Acacia and Daviesia, mammals, hylid frogs, myobatrachid frogs, passerine birds, and camaenid land snails. We measured species richness, weighted species endemism (WE) and two phylodiversity measures, phylogenetic diversity (PD) and phylogenetic endemism (PE), as well as their respective complementarity scores (a measure of gains and losses) at 20. km resolution.Higher PD was identified within SEQ for all fauna groups, whereas more PD was found in SWWA for both plant groups. PD and PD complementarity were strongly correlated with species richness and species complementarity for most groups but less so for plants. PD and PE were found to complement traditional species-based measures for all groups studied: PD and PE follow similar spatial patterns to richness and WE, but highlighted different areas that would not be identified by conventional species-based biodiversity analyses alone.The application of phylodiversity measures, particularly the novel weighted complementary measures considered here, in conservation can enhance protection of the evolutionary history that contributes to present day biodiversity values of areas. Phylogenetic measures in conservation can include important elements of biodiversity in conservation planning, such as evolutionary potential and feature diversity that will improve decision-making and lead to better biodiversity conservation outcomes.

    U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.113

    DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.113

    M3 - Article

    VL - 534

    SP - 131

    EP - 143

    JO - Science of the Total Environment

    JF - Science of the Total Environment

    SN - 0048-9697

    ER -